Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 709 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  69642   Thu Feb 2 10:58:54 2023 Question Daniel Sajdykdaniel.sajdyk@gmail.comQuestionLinux3.1.4Installing Elog on Linux Oracle 9 and missing libssl.so.10

Hello,

I  tried to install Elog 3.1.4 from rpm on Oracle Linux 9 with command:

sudo dnf localinstall elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64.rpm

But I got error:

Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:06 ago on Thu 02 Feb 2023 10:35:13 CET.
Error:
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides libssl.so.10()(64bit) needed by elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64
  - nothing provides libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) needed by elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Using dnf I installed libssl.so.11 (cannot find version 10) and it doesn't help. So my question is: can I use one of proposes by dnf solution as:

  1. --skip-broken
  2. --nobest

Does Elog will work stabilityy after that?

Best Regards

  68280   Fri Mar 11 17:19:02 2016 Reply Phil Rubinrubinp@cern.chQuestionLinux3.1.1Installation: Failed Dependencies

Is there anything I can do about this?


kernel:  2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64

ldd (GNU libc) 2.12

/lib64/libc.so.6

/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10


rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm

error: Failed dependencies:

libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

  68281   Fri Mar 11 17:29:47 2016 Question Phil Rubinrubinp@cern.chQuestionLinux3.1.1Installation: Failed Dependencies

Is there anything I can do about this?


kernel:  2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64

ldd (GNU libc) 2.12

/lib64/libc.so.6

/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10


rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm

error: Failed dependencies:

libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

  69764   Thu Mar 21 15:23:52 2024 Question Nina Bondarenkonina.bondarenko@uu.seQuestionLinux3.1.5-1Installation with amp on Rocky Linux

Hello all,

I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem. 

rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm 

error: Failed dependencies:

    liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

    libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

    libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

    libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

 

Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!

Bests, Nina

  66016   Mon Oct 27 13:05:13 2008 Entry George B.i93.borg@gmail.comBug reportLinux2.7.5Installation problems
Hello,

I just upgraded to elog 2.7.5 from 2.6.4 on my Debian system. Here is some feedback:

1) "make" fails if libssl-dev package is not installed. Documentation does not mention SSL library requirements.

2) /etc/init.d/elogd: line 10: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No such file or directory (I fixed this by commenting
out that line).

3) Starting elogd: /etc/init.d/elogd: line 34: echo_success: command not found (Fixed by search/replace "echo_"
to "echo ").


Hope this helps.

George.
  65976   Mon Sep 15 16:22:39 2008 Question Wythe ITcarwile@avwtech.comBug reportWindows2.7.4Install on Server 2003:

I am using Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard Edition.  It is up-to-date and a full legal version installed from a geniune MS disk (to put that notion out the way).  I host a variety of webpages from this server through IIS6.0.

I am having an issue after installation of the ELOG software.  I grabbed the newest version from this website and ran the executable.  It installed fine (or appeared to do so).

Upon starting the ELOG server I receive the following error:

elogd.exe - Unable to Locate Component

This application has failed to start because MSVCR71.dll was not found.  Re-installing the application may fix this problem.

 

The file in question is part of an ancient Visual C distributeable.  This distributeable for my purposes no longer appears to be available (as I am on .net 3.5).  I am unsure of downloading the older runtime libraries from sites that are not microsoft's.  I am curious as to how I could go about making elog execute.  Any help would be appreciated.  Thank you!

 

  1444   Mon Oct 10 19:22:51 2005 Warning Exaos LeeExaos.Lee@gmail.comBug reportMac OSX2.6.0-betaInstall error on MacOS X
Executing "make" on MacOS X is OK, but "make install" failed due to the following error:
/usr/bin/install -m 0755 -d /usr/local/bin /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/man/man1/ /usr/local/man/man8/
/usr/bin/install -m 0755 -o bin -g bin elog elconv /usr/local/bin
install: bin: Invalid argument
make: *** [install] Error 67

The reason is that the account "bin" and group "bin" are missing on MacOS X. I also found that the following lines in "Makefile" doesn't work:
ifeq ($(OSTYPE),darwin)
CC = cc
endif

I have fixed this problem. The diff of Makefile as following:
diff Makefile.darwin Makefile.origin
====================================
24,25d23
< BINOWNER = bin
< BINGROUP = bin
30,31d27
< OSTYPE = $(shell uname)
<
40,43d35
< ifeq ($(OSTYPE),Darwin)
< OSTYPE=darwin
< endif
<
46,47d37
< BINOWNER = root
< BINGROUP = admin
89,90c79,80
<       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o ${BINOWNER} -g ${BINGROUP} elog elconv $(DESTDIR)
<       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o ${BINOWNER} -g ${BINGROUP} elogd $(SDESTDIR)
---
>       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o bin -g bin elog elconv $(DESTDIR)
>       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o bin -g bin elogd $(SDESTDIR)


The modified Makefiles have been attached.
Attachment 1: makefile_modified.tgz
  1843   Fri Jun 2 21:20:06 2006 Question Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjoselaine@ccuec.unicamp.brQuestionLinux2.6.1-1681Inserting images via Internet Explorer
Hi Stefan,

I observed that there is a difference between IE and others browsers.
When I use "insert image" button in Netscape, for instance,
it creates automatically a tag like
[IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG]
and
includes an attachment in the ELOG entry.

When a try to do the same action in Internet Explorer, only
the attachment is created without the tag
[IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG]
.

I did the same test using this forum, and the results are identical
that was related above.

Is it a bug or I'm doing something wrong ?

Thanks,

Elaine
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6