ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1967
|
Tue Oct 10 11:36:13 2006 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Request | Linux | Windows | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: Turn off smileys? |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I agree that the ?) smiley is annoying, so I changed it to ?-) which should prevent it from showing up in questions in brackets. I updated this server (you can see the effect above), the modification is committed to subversion. |
Thanks a lot! I'm going to pester you though - it would be really good if there was an option to turn them off completely. Surely it can't be a huge amount of work... ? |
1968
|
Tue Oct 10 11:40:47 2006 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Request | Linux | Windows | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: Append option for elog.exe |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Unfortunately it is not simple under Windows to extend the right-click functionality. What I do is to use a snapshot program (like HoverSnap). Triggered with a definable hot key, it grabs a region of the screen and puts it into a GIF file. Then you can attach it to an elog. I agree it takes a couple of clicks, but it's still a quick thing. |
I think you misunderstand me. I was asking whether it would be possible for the elog command-line client program to have an "append to existing entry" option. That program's actually just what I need though - thanks!
ben |
1971
|
Tue Oct 10 11:49:15 2006 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Request | Linux | Windows | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: Append option for elog.exe |
Stefan Ritt wrote: | The elog command-line program has a -e switch to edit existing entries, but you need to know the ID of the entry. |
Yes, but if you use -e "text" it replaces the whole entry with "text". So an append option would be really useful... |
1972
|
Tue Oct 10 15:32:21 2006 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Request | All | 2.6.2-1714 | 'Inline' button for attachments |
Hi,
It would be good if when you uploaded an image as an attachment, there was a button next to it that pasted the code [img]elog:1972/1[/img] into the log entry. This way, it would be more easy to have inline images in a log entry.
cheers
ben |
1974
|
Tue Oct 10 16:15:21 2006 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Request | All | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: Re: 'Inline' button for attachments |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Ben Shepherd wrote: | Hi,

and it does exactly what you want. |
cool! thanks. |
2171
|
Tue Mar 20 13:45:20 2007 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54'at'dl'dot'ac'dot'uk | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1739 | Private logbook - no guest access? | Hi,
I want to set up a logbook which you have to be logged in to be able to read entries. I've already got three logbooks which can be viewed by anyone but only logged-in users can modify them. For the fourth one, I want to have a private logbook which can't be read by 'guest' users. Is this possible?
cheers
ben |
2173
|
Tue Mar 20 14:42:05 2007 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1739 | Re: Private logbook - no guest access? |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Ben Shepherd wrote: | I want to set up a logbook which you have to be logged in to be able to read entries. I've already got three logbooks which can be viewed by anyone but only logged-in users can modify them. For the fourth one, I want to have a private logbook which can't be read by 'guest' users. Is this possible? |
Per default, logbooks can only be read by logged in users if you use "password file = xxx". It is however possible to make these logbooks readable by 'guest' users if you use "Guest menu commands = xxx" and "Guest list menu commands = xxx". So just remove these two options from your fourth logbook and you get what you want. |
Thanks! I actually saw that in the config documentation, but I had assumed that it didn't work. Turns out I'd left those two options in my [global] section as well. Oops! |
65987
|
Fri Oct 3 15:29:01 2008 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Question | Linux | Windows | 2.7.2-2041 | Summary lines spill over | Hi,
I've set up my ELOG configuration to display one summary line in the list view. However, a word from the next line creeps in from time to time. You can see this in my logbook - look at the 'Text' column for entries 805, 802 and 800 for instance. The word 'Shift' is from the second line of the entry, but it has been added to the summary text for some reason. Any ideas how I can fix this?
ben |
|