ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67965
|
Fri Jun 5 23:10:27 2015 |
| David Wallis | wallis@aps.anl.gov | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.0 | Auto save feature not working on 3.1.0 |
Auto-saving does not seem to be working. In the config file, I have the following:
Save drafts = 1
Autosave = 10
but I never see the "auto saving" message or get any other indication that the feature is working.
Am I missing something? |
67966
|
Sat Jun 6 13:38:15 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.0 | Re: Drag-and-drop not working in elog 3.1.0 |
As you've pointed out, for the very same browsers D&D works with the Forum, and that is ELOG 3.1.0.
Hence I can only conclude that it is neither a browser, nor an ELOG issue, but a problem of your local installation. Maybe you try with a fresh and clean installation first? What Linux are you using, by the way?
Or you've picked by bad luck a 3.1.0 version where D&D did really not work. But I cannot tell, since you did not specify the git revision in the ELOG version (it is possible now ;-)
Cheers
Andreas
David Wallis wrote: |
Drag and drop for attachments dosn't work on either Chrome 37.0.2062.94 (64-bit) or FIrefox 31.5.3 (both on Linux). D&D works on the midas.psi.ch demo page.
On my logbooks, the "drop attachements here" area does not have a dashed line border.
I don't see anything in the elogd.conf file that pertains to this feature.
|
|
67974
|
Tue Jun 9 15:22:03 2015 |
| Midas User | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Other | this one | Re: edit somebody else's draft |
> this elog offers me to edit a draft message, then yells at me "only some other user can edit this draft!!!".
> methinks I should only be offered to edit draft messages that I own or I can edit. K.O.
I changed this behaviour now, so authors can only edit their own drafts. Furthermore, drafts are not shown any more in the elog lists. In addition, deleting of entries is allowed now again in this forum, so if someone creates a draft by accident, he/she can delete it.
/Stefan |
67975
|
Tue Jun 9 15:28:53 2015 |
| Midas User | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 3.1.0-3 | Re: Attribute not updated |
> I saw in the doc that an attribute cant be bigger than 100 char. but I couldn't figure the maximum size for options... I'm wondering if the issue comes from the browser not refreshing correctly or if its elog..
The number of possible options is limited in elog to 100. This is defined by MAX_N_LIST in elogd.h. You can try to increase it and recompile elogd, but no guarantee that this works.
The reason that it *sometimes* work is really a bug, I should do better limit checkings...
/Stefan |
67983
|
Tue Jun 9 17:09:22 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.0-2 | ELOG Forum: drafts cannot be deleted |
> Another strange thing: the draft got submitted when I hit the "Back" button after reopening it.
Well, this is a problem indeed. When edit entries now, drafts gets saved regularly, overwriting your original entry. This is a limitation of the elog database, which cannot do full versioning. So "Back" is actually the same as "Commit without email notification". Or better "Commit some ten seconds ago". Now I
don't know what the best solution is. I'm tempted to just remove the "Back" button and replace it with a "Delete" button. So people can either submit an entry or delete it completely. Any thoughts? |
67984
|
Tue Jun 9 17:17:11 2015 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.1-22022e6 | Problem with a draft message |
Hi Stefan,
I had started to write a completely different bug report, but then realised I had not checked a detail. I had written about one sentence. So I decided to abort the message, and hit the "back" button. Only I found that this had created a new entry in the elog listings. I immediately went in and deleted it, but I had expected the "Back" button to have aborted the entry (as it does in 2.9.x) not to submit the entry!
It doesn't seem to have created an email, though. And for the sake of all your users, I'd not want to experiment here on the matter too much! |
67985
|
Tue Jun 9 17:21:25 2015 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.1-22022e6 | Re: Problem with a draft message |
Just to comment that I submitted the entry below by pressing the "Back" button!
David Pilgram wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I had started to write a completely different bug report, but then realised I had not checked a detail. I had written about one sentence. So I decided to abort the message, and hit the "back" button. Only I found that this had created a new entry in the elog listings. I immediately went in and deleted it, but I had expected the "Back" button to have aborted the entry (as it does in 2.9.x) not to submit the entry!
It doesn't seem to have created an email, though. And for the sake of all your users, I'd not want to experiment here on the matter too much!
|
|
67986
|
Tue Jun 9 17:23:27 2015 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.1-22022e6 | Re: Problem with a draft message |
Just to comment that the expected emails that one would have expected with the last two entries have either
been held up or simply have not been generated and sent - both the preceeding entries were submitted by using the "Back" button, this time I'll use the "Submit" button, which should generate a email.
David Pilgram wrote: |
Just to comment that I submitted the entry below by pressing the "Back" button!
David Pilgram wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I had started to write a completely different bug report, but then realised I had not checked a detail. I had written about one sentence. So I decided to abort the message, and hit the "back" button. Only I found that this had created a new entry in the elog listings. I immediately went in and deleted it, but I had expected the "Back" button to have aborted the entry (as it does in 2.9.x) not to submit the entry!
It doesn't seem to have created an email, though. And for the sake of all your users, I'd not want to experiment here on the matter too much!
|
|
|