Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Sebastian Schenk on Thu Jan 19 15:28:16 2023
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted
in November 2021. |
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 19 17:00:37 2023
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan |
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Jan 20 10:25:23 2023
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop
deleting it? |
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Sebastian Schenk on Fri Jan 20 13:12:48 2023
|
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes
the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software. |
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Edmund Blomley on Mon Jan 23 21:21:56 2023
|
It was now moved to the Draft space (which I did not even now existed so far): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ELOG
Sebastian
Schenk wrote:
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted |
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 23 22:24:23 2023
|
I added some more references, that's about all I can do. Not sure if that is enough.
Stefan
Edmund |
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Edmund Blomley on Tue Jan 24 11:31:59 2023
|
If I understand it correctly I think it has to be submitted for review with the blue button on that page, just not sure if that should come from your
side or someone else
Stefan |
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Jan 27 22:25:18 2023
|
It appears to me that this is a really stupid problem: the article provides many links to sources, but they are just links, not "references".
That does not count, since links could be something else than references.
I'll try to edit it and transform the list of external links into references to verify the text. Lets hope that this will suffice. |