Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 723 of 795  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Emailup Category OS ELOG Version Subject Text Attachments
  1692   Tue Feb 14 16:22:56 2006 Warning Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportOther2.6.1CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at riskStefan, I am concerned that there are becoming
too many Linux dependencies in terms of required
libraries and header files.  Although we
  
  1694   Tue Feb 14 22:31:08 2006 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportOther2.6.1Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve
Jones"]Stefan, I am concerned that there
are becoming too many Linux dependencies
  
  1697   Wed Feb 15 19:02:32 2006 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportOther2.6.1Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve
Jones"]Question: Is the functionality really
just to issue an arbitrary command-string
  
  1699   Mon Feb 20 17:50:33 2006 Smile Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportOther2.6.1Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]If
possible, could one use the [code]int system(const
char *s);[/code] function in conjunction
  
  1700   Mon Feb 20 17:52:06 2006 Smile Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionOther2.6.1Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve
Jones"]BTW, Stefan, this code in Makefile
does not work on Solaris
  
  1701   Tue Feb 21 19:25:28 2006 Question Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionAll2.6.1svn revision number in the sourceThere is a variable $Id$ in source that looks
like it is supposed to reflect the svn revision
number of the compiled code.  How is this
  
  1703   Tue Feb 21 21:01:22 2006 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionAll2.6.1Re: svn revision number in the source[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]There
is a variable $Id$ in source that looks like
it is supposed to reflect the svn revision
  
  1705   Tue Feb 21 21:58:16 2006 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionAll2.6.1Re: svn revision number in the source[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]So,
when we go to the download section and download
directly from there, that is not "committed"
  
ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf