| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
66121
|
Fri Dec 19 14:15:28 2008 |
 | Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Question | Linux | 2.7.5-2137 | Tooltips for MOptions - not working? | Hi,
One of my logbooks is a fault reporting system; it emails a group of people when a fault is reported. There is an MOption 'Technical Groups', and I want to have a tooltip for each checkbox which shows who is referred to by each group name. However, individual tooltips for each MOption attribute don't seem to work. I've looked at the HTML code, and there's no 'title' attribute for the checkboxes, so it's not a browser problem. I've attached my config file. Any idea what's going wrong?
ben |
| Attachment 1: elogd.cfg
|
Data dir = /web/Elog/ERLP/logbooks/erlpfaults
Summary page title = ALICE Faults
List page title = ALICE Faults
Page title = ALICE Faults: $Title
RSS title = $message ID: $Title
Comment = ALICE Faults
Menu commands = List, New, Edit, Reply, Delete, Find, Config, Admin, Logout, Help
Guest Menu commands = List, Find, Login, Help
Find Menu commands = List, New, Select, Find, Config, Admin, Logout, Help
Guest Find Menu commands = List, Find, Login, Help
Attributes = Submitted by, Title, Personnel, Technical Groups, Cc, Machine Areas, Priority
MOptions Technical Groups = Accelerator Physics, Magnets, RF, Vacuum, Cryogenics, Power Supplies, Controls, Diagnostics, Photoinjector, Engineering, Health & Safety, Services, Personnel Safety System
Comment Technical Groups = Emails will be sent out<BR>to the specified groups.
Comment Cc = Additional email addresses;<BR>separate using commas.
MOptions Machine Areas = laser, gun, transfer line 1, booster, transfer line 2, linac, arc 1, compressor, FEL, arc 2, dump
ROptions Priority = critical, high, normal, low, fixed
Extendable Options = Personnel
Use Email From = dlerlp@example.com
#email goes to each of the people listed here, for entries where the technical group is specified
Email "Technical Groups" "Accelerator Physics" = susan.smith@example.com, yuri.saveliev@example.com
Tooltip "Technical Groups" "Accelerator Physics" = "Susan Smith, Yuri Saveliev"
Email "Technical Groups" Magnets = neil.thompson@example.com, ben.shepherd@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" RF = peter.mcintosh@example.com, andrew.moss@example.com
Tooltip "Technical Groups" RF = "Pete McIntosh, Andy Moss"
Email "Technical Groups" Vacuum = thomas.weston@example.com, keith.middleman@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" Cryogenics = shrikant.pattalwar@example.com, bob.bate@example.com, andy.goulden@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" "Power Supplies" = stephen.griffiths@example.com, chris.white@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" Controls = adrian.oates@example.com, ralph.rotheroe@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" Diagnostics = rob.smith@example.com, steven.jamison@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" Photoinjector = susan.smith@example.com, rob.smith@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" Engineering = phil.atkinson@example.com, paul.hindley@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" "Health & Safety" = andy.goulden@example.com, stephen.hill@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" Services = andy.goulden@example.com, rachael.buckley@example.com
Email "Technical Groups" "Personnel Safety System" = john.alexander@example.com, christopher.chorlton@example.com
Email All = $Cc, $user_email
Use Email Subject = $Title (ALICE Fault Notification)
Preset Submitted by = $long_name
Preset on reply Submitted by = $long_name
Preset Priority = normal
Locked Attributes = Submitted by
Quick filter = Date, Technical Groups, Machine Areas, Priority
List display = ID, Date, Title, Technical Groups, Machine Areas, Priority
Summary lines = 0
|
|
1743
|
Thu Mar 2 23:32:25 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Request | All | 2.6.1 | Top Groups and logbook directorys | I am re-working our elog setup and am seriously looking at using the "Top Group" feature. What I like best is the ability to create [global] configurations for a group (or type) of logbook when I host multiple types on the same server. I also like being able to specify a different password file, etc.
A limitation that I run into is I would really like the actual directory names used for storing the logbooks for the different types to be identical - which isn't possible when all logbooks (regardless of context) exist at the same directory level. For example, I might have:
3 physical locations: ABC, DEF, GHI
For each location I want to maintain two *groups* of logbooks - CircuitTests and BoardTests. What I would like to end up with is:
- CircuitTests
----ABC
----DEF
----GHI
- BoardTests
----ABC
----DEF
----GHI
Under current elog this is not possble as far as I know. Since each logbook is a physical directory, each logbook requires a unique name. The concept of a named [global] area fills the bill for all things but it would be nifty if one could do:
[global circuittests]
Logbook dir = circuittestlogbooks
[global boardtests]
Logbook dir = boardtestlogbooks
I suppose the poorman's way of doing this is for each logbook to do the following:
[ABC]
Subdir = boardtestlogbooks/ABC
[DEF]
Subdir = boardtestlogbooks/DEF
[GHI]
Subdir = boardtestlogbooks/GHI
or something like that, but I was hopic for something a little more integrated - like creating the hierarchical stuff via the GUI. Anyway, this probably sounds like a major overhaul, which definitely wouldn't be worth it unless I have completely missed something glaringly obvious.
Thanks! |
|
1379
|
Fri Aug 5 02:27:15 2005 |
 | Chris Green | greenc@fnal.gov | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0-CVS | Top Groups, Show Top Groups, password file and Protect Selection page have nasty interaction | Hi,
Just as our ELOG went into production, I tripped over a couple of related (I think) bugs.
First, the easy one: line 21368 of src/elogd.c has a compile warning which looks non-benign. I fixed it in my local copy with:
Index: elogd.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/elog/src/elogd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.739
diff -r1.739 elogd.c
21368,21369c21368
< sprintf(str, "?fail=1", user);
< redirect(lbs, str);
---
> redirect(lbs, "?fail=1");
Regardless (ie if I use the original CVS code or the patched version), a hard-to trace problem occurs with my configuration whereby users are denied access after password entry at the logbook selection page (even when details are verifiably correct), and users are dropped through to the next (non-protected) Top Group page. This problem goes away if "Protect Selection Page" is turned off.
A kind of "shadow" of this problem occurs if you create a new logbook from the Change Config File page, whereby after creating the new logbook one is dropped through to the next Top Group's selection page after saving the configuration (and the url has ?fail=1 added to it, althoguh line 21368 above is hardly the only place where this could have occurred).
I think all these things are linked. I'd be grateful if you could review this section of this code for possible causes of these problems. While we can operate for now with non-logged-in users able to see our list of logbooks, that is not something we want for the long term.
Thanks for your help,
Chris. |
|
1919
|
Thu Aug 31 21:46:15 2006 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Bug report | All | 2.6.2-1714 | Top Text and Bottom Text only show "text" --- no files | | Just compiled 2.6.2-1714 and "Top text" and "Bottom text" interpret everything as "text" --- nothing is interpreted as a file to be included, unless there is a new syntax. |
|
66155
|
Tue Jan 20 15:09:54 2009 |
 | Michael Ambrus | ambrmi09@gmail.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.5 | Top group causes: Internal error, no valid header! | Having "Top group" in a config-file for Windows will cause:
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: eudr6j03j:8084
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/20
08120122 Firefox/3.0.5
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: sv-se,sv;q=0.8,en-us;q=0.5,en;q=0.3
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: unm=mambrus; upwd=U2lzc2kx; urem=0
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Internal error, no valid header!
Removing "top group" makes elogd.exe work. The error is repeatable and the same config file works on the same version of Elog on Linux. Elog was compiled with Cygwin. |
|
66682
|
Wed Jan 13 12:00:04 2010 |
 | David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Info | Linux | 2.7.8 | Topic changed to: emails sent/received after edited entries. | > > > I only got one email in response to the second entry of this thread, no email was received after the edit of the entry. The
> > > next email received was due to the third entry of this thread.
> >
> > Ok, let me try (sorry to all the users who subscribe to this forum for pestering you...):
> >
> > 1st reply to your entry.
> >
> > 1st reply edited.
>
> I got two email notifications, the second one I attached as a screen shot. So I don't know what happened in your case. The problem
> with the proxy is sometimes related to slow internet connections. If the HTML code transported over the internet has some delay
> between packets, the proxy server sometimes drops the connection. I don't know how to fix that in my Apache. If you edit in HTML,
> your browser downloads the JavaScript code and icons for the edit window, which is a lot of data, so the dropping is much more
> likely.
Hi Stefan,
I confirm that this is a slow internet line, so that explains the Proxy Error.
Maybe I should just keep my head down on threads where people use html coding ;-)
Did you receive two emails to my entry 66677? I only received one.
I only received one email to your posting 66680 - the first entry, not the edited version. |
|
66683
|
Wed Jan 13 12:18:54 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | Linux | 2.7.8 | Topic changed to: emails sent/received after edited entries. | > > > > I only got one email in response to the second entry of this thread, no email was received after the edit of the entry. The
> > > > next email received was due to the third entry of this thread.
> > >
> > > Ok, let me try (sorry to all the users who subscribe to this forum for pestering you...):
> > >
> > > 1st reply to your entry.
> > >
> > > 1st reply edited.
> >
> > I got two email notifications, the second one I attached as a screen shot. So I don't know what happened in your case. The problem
> > with the proxy is sometimes related to slow internet connections. If the HTML code transported over the internet has some delay
> > between packets, the proxy server sometimes drops the connection. I don't know how to fix that in my Apache. If you edit in HTML,
> > your browser downloads the JavaScript code and icons for the edit window, which is a lot of data, so the dropping is much more
> > likely.
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I confirm that this is a slow internet line, so that explains the Proxy Error.
>
> Maybe I should just keep my head down on threads where people use html coding ;-)
>
> Did you receive two emails to my entry 66677? I only received one.
>
> I only received one email to your posting 66680 - the first entry, not the edited version.
I checked my email server and found that the second message really went though it. But then I realized that there is indeed the "Message-
ID:" in the email header (which I completely forgot in meantime). So maybe George Paplexis is right in that some mail
server/forwarder/receiver ignore a second email if it has the same ID. That would mean however that I have to introduce a "revision
number" for elog entries, which gets incremented on each edit and gets attached the the message-ID, so that it becomes unique again.
That's quite some work and has to wait a bit. |
|
66684
|
Wed Jan 13 12:27:32 2010 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Info | Linux | 2.7.8 | Topic changed to: emails sent/received after edited entries. | > > > > > I only got one email in response to the second entry of this thread, no email was received after the edit of the entry. The
> > > > > next email received was due to the third entry of this thread.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, let me try (sorry to all the users who subscribe to this forum for pestering you...):
> > > >
> > > > 1st reply to your entry.
> > > >
> > > > 1st reply edited.
> > >
> > > I got two email notifications, the second one I attached as a screen shot. So I don't know what happened in your case. The problem
> > > with the proxy is sometimes related to slow internet connections. If the HTML code transported over the internet has some delay
> > > between packets, the proxy server sometimes drops the connection. I don't know how to fix that in my Apache. If you edit in HTML,
> > > your browser downloads the JavaScript code and icons for the edit window, which is a lot of data, so the dropping is much more
> > > likely.
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > I confirm that this is a slow internet line, so that explains the Proxy Error.
> >
> > Maybe I should just keep my head down on threads where people use html coding ;-)
> >
> > Did you receive two emails to my entry 66677? I only received one.
> >
> > I only received one email to your posting 66680 - the first entry, not the edited version.
>
> I checked my email server and found that the second message really went though it. But then I realized that there is indeed the "Message-
> ID:" in the email header (which I completely forgot in meantime). So maybe George Paplexis is right in that some mail
> server/forwarder/receiver ignore a second email if it has the same ID. That would mean however that I have to introduce a "revision
> number" for elog entries, which gets incremented on each edit and gets attached the the message-ID, so that it becomes unique again.
> That's quite some work and has to wait a bit.
I had come to the same conclusion about the mail header being the same (see my email to you for full details).
Sorry to all your subscribers for the email ping pong, although if others did receive two emails on the relivent entries - one original, and
one edited, it would be interesting, if possibly now academic, to know. |
|