Use eLOG with Google Chrome, posted by Robert-Jan Schrijvers on Tue Sep 8 10:46:22 2009
|
Hi Stephan,
one of the eLOG users at our company, has problems using eLOG in combination with Google Chrome (version 2.0.172.43), log in gives no problem,
when selecting the appropiate department, he get's the following error: |
Use eLOG with Google Chrome, posted by Robert-Jan Schrijvers on Tue Sep 8 10:46:46 2009
|
Hi Stephan,
one of the eLOG users at our company, has problems using eLOG in combination with Google Chrome (version 2.0.172.43), log in gives no problem,
when selecting the appropiate department, he get's the following error: |
Use eLOG with Google Chrome, posted by Robert-Jan Schrijvers on Tue Sep 8 10:47:08 2009
|
Hi Stefan,
one of the eLOG users at our company, has problems using eLOG in combination with Google Chrome (version 2.0.172.43), log in gives no problem,
when selecting the appropiate department, he get's the following error: |
Mail are no longer sent from the logged in user in 2.9.0, posted by Olivier Callot on Wed Mar 23 10:01:01 2011
|
We upgraded to Elog 2.9.0-2402 and since then mails sent by Elog when posting an item are from the default account, not from the logged in user's mail
address.
The configuration is, for the mail part : |
Self Register = 3 doesn't work any longer, posted by Olivier Callot on Wed Apr 13 10:51:34 2011
|
With the recent Elog 2.9.0 rev 2412 the Self Register = 3 option doesn't work as expected: The user is immediately allowed to login. This is not what
this option was doing, which is to wait for an approval by the administrator. Can this behaviour be restored, or should I change the value of the Self
Register flag? Thanks |
Re: Self Register = 3 doesn't work any longer, posted by Olivier Callot on Fri Apr 15 11:49:43 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Re: Self Register = 3 doesn't work any longer, posted by Olivier Callot on Tue May 17 13:19:03 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Re: Self Register = 3 doesn't work any longer, posted by Olivier Callot on Tue May 17 17:00:03 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|