Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 732 of 801  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show only new entries    6404 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 731, 732, 733 ... 799, 800, 801   Next  
ID Date Icondown Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  958   Wed Feb 23 18:07:24 2005 Entry Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportAllr1.571boundary problem with Type lists display
using:
Display mode = threaded
List display = Subject, Type, Author, Date

in the config file (omitting "ID" then) rise the bug

ie, an unneeded "," is displayed after the "supposed to be printed" ID
  974   Mon Mar 7 16:05:22 2005 Entry Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportAllrev. 1.51Display <attribute> do erroneously encoded
Display subject = <b>$subject</b>

is printed to the browser encoded, so that it is diplayed as is..
  1046   Thu Mar 31 16:29:07 2005 Entry Michael Husbynmichaelh@online.noQuestionLinux2.5.8-2Want to change Entry time when using Copy To
Hello,

Tried to use the copy to version, just to create a new copy of a old case in
the same logbook
(e.g, support logbook, user with an old problem, to copy it to a new entry)

What I want is to have the Entry time to be updated to the time it was
copyed, not the original entry time. Moved To should perhaps retain its
original time?

Somethings that is possible or a new feature that has to be implemented?


Thanks for this great software Stefan!

Best regards
Michael Husbyn
  1155   Sat May 21 15:05:23 2005 Entry David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netBug reportWindows2.6.0-betaIncorrect Display
I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.

I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.


BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.
Attachment 1: capture-firefox-1.03.JPG
capture-firefox-1.03.JPG
  1156   Sat May 21 15:23:08 2005 Entry David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netBug reportWindows2.6.0-betaRe: Incorrect Display

David Spindler wrote:
I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.

I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.


BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.


I guess it did upload. Here is the other screen capture.

BTW, I received the following message upon submitting my last post:
Quote:
"Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: <>"
Attachment 1: capture-firefox-1.03-log-entry.JPG
capture-firefox-1.03-log-entry.JPG
  1157   Mon May 23 17:47:24 2005 Entry David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netBug reportWindows2.6.0-betaRe: Incorrect Display
Never mind. I figured it out. I used two fields (date and time) that are automatically placed in elog. It messed up the spacing, altough what was puzzling was that it displayed correctly on the entry itself, but not the list. Anyway, I renamed the date and time to another name and it is ok.

Thanks, anyway. Keep up the good work.


David Spindler wrote:

David Spindler wrote:
I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.

I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.


BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.


I guess it did upload. Here is the other screen capture.

BTW, I received the following message upon submitting my last post:
Quote:
"Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: <>"
  1158   Tue May 24 20:32:08 2005 Entry Andynekto@myway.com   Problem with auto-increment attribute
I have a very strange problem with auto-increment attribute. Here is a part of my configuration:

Attributes = Access ID, Harvest Date, Access, Species, PI, Submission date, Stain, Comments
Preset Access ID = MI-05-%03d
Type Harvest date = date
Type Submission date = date

I tried to add new entry, and it's Access ID is MI-05-001. But when I'm adding another entries,
there Access ID is MI-05-006
I found only one mention of using increment in documentation.
What I'm doing wrong?
  1169   Fri Jun 3 17:34:44 2005 Entry Geoffrey Carmangeoffc@yorku.caBug reportWindows2.6.0-betaRe: Incorrect Display

David Spindler wrote:

BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.


We just did the 2.60 beta upgrade, and now our pre-existing logbooks, with a
List Display = Name, Author, Date for example will only show the first two fields.

It seems like Elog is dropping the last attribute in the List Display line.

We can 'fix' it by making it say:
List Display = Name, Author, Date, Date
so that it drops the second Date, but that is a bad workaround.

Anyone else seeing this?

Elog 2.60 beta on Linux, Firefox 1.04 as the client. Or IE fully patched on WinXP SP2.

PS: Love Elog at work here too! Truly has made our documentation way better. And RSS feeds of the logbooks is just wonderful.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 731, 732, 733 ... 799, 800, 801   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6