Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 73 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  69298   Tue Feb 2 08:25:46 2021 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Windows3.1.4Re: Different Top Groups or Groups have the same logbook name

That's correct.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Unfortunately you have to name these top groups differently, because they are internally used for the database name.

MATT TERRON wrote:

I have built different top groups for different departments. But occasionally these different top groups have the same logbook name, say 'Maintenance Log'. So is there a way I can have the same logbook name under different 'Top Groups', rather than rename these logbooks as 'Department1 Maintenance Log' all the way to 'Department_X Maintenance Log'?

 

 

  69297   Tue Feb 2 08:17:15 2021 Reply MATT TERRONmatao11235@gmail.comQuestionLinux | Windows3.1.4Re: Different Top Groups or Groups have the same logbook name

So both Top Group names and Logbook names should be unique inside one .cfg file, is that correct?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Unfortunately you have to name these top groups differently, because they are internally used for the database name.

MATT TERRON wrote:

I have built different top groups for different departments. But occasionally these different top groups have the same logbook name, say 'Maintenance Log'. So is there a way I can have the same logbook name under different 'Top Groups', rather than rename these logbooks as 'Department1 Maintenance Log' all the way to 'Department_X Maintenance Log'?

 

 

  69296   Tue Feb 2 07:43:49 2021 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Windows3.1.4Re: Different Top Groups or Groups have the same logbook name

Unfortunately you have to name these top groups differently, because they are internally used for the database name.

MATT TERRON wrote:

I have built different top groups for different departments. But occasionally these different top groups have the same logbook name, say 'Maintenance Log'. So is there a way I can have the same logbook name under different 'Top Groups', rather than rename these logbooks as 'Department1 Maintenance Log' all the way to 'Department_X Maintenance Log'?

 

  69295   Tue Feb 2 04:01:21 2021 Question MATT TERRONmatao11235@gmail.comQuestionLinux | Windows3.1.4Different Top Groups or Groups have the same logbook name

I have built different top groups for different departments. But occasionally these different top groups have the same logbook name, say 'Maintenance Log'. So is there a way I can have the same logbook name under different 'Top Groups', rather than rename these logbooks as 'Department1 Maintenance Log' all the way to 'Department_X Maintenance Log'?

  69294   Thu Jan 14 14:05:19 2021 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux3.1.3Re: elog slowness

Have you tried to restart the elogd server? The CLOSE_WAIT could be dangling network connections, which were not properly closed by the browser.

Giuseppe Cucinotta wrote:

We run elog on a server to provide a logbook for our laboratory. We noticed that elog is very slow on loading pages: browser pages spend a lot of time in charging (actually one can speed the procedure refreshing the page but it is quite annoying).

I checked the server load with top and it doesn't show any abnormal CPU or memory usage. Then I ran lsof and I noticed that there are more than 200 entries related to the same elog PID and labelled with CLOSE_WAIT.

My questions are: can the slowness of my logbook be due to the presence of all these CLOSE_WAIT entries (which seems if I understood well wait for a response)? If it's the case, how can I solve this issue?

Thanks

 

  69293   Thu Jan 14 11:43:00 2021 Question Giuseppe Cucinottagiuseppe.cucinotta@unifi.itQuestionLinux3.1.3elog slowness

We run elog on a server to provide a logbook for our laboratory. We noticed that elog is very slow on loading pages: browser pages spend a lot of time in charging (actually one can speed the procedure refreshing the page but it is quite annoying).

I checked the server load with top and it doesn't show any abnormal CPU or memory usage. Then I ran lsof and I noticed that there are more than 200 entries related to the same elog PID and labelled with CLOSE_WAIT.

My questions are: can the slowness of my logbook be due to the presence of all these CLOSE_WAIT entries (which seems if I understood well wait for a response)? If it's the case, how can I solve this issue?

Thanks

  69291   Sun Jan 10 11:13:31 2021 Question Lahreche Abdelmadjidabdelmadjid.lahreche@yahoo.comQuestionWindows2006hidden files

Hello;

Could I make change on program only on the " elogd.cfg" ?

Or is there onother files, because I think there is hidden files ?

  69290   Fri Jan 8 15:35:35 2021 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Windows3.1.2Re: Parsing log files

Well, you could put the old options back to the config file, do the export, then remove them again.

But have a look at the Elog database files ZZMMDDa.log in your logbook directory, they are pure ASCII files, which are relatively simple to parse.

Hi John. The problem with using the Find-->Export method is that some of the Attributes for the older data are no longer shown on that screen because the Config file has since changed. That's why I'm contemplating somehow parsing the log files directly instead.

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6