Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 73 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Authordown Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  67374   Wed Nov 7 12:56:12 2012 Agree Vinícius Ferrãoviniciusferrao@if.ufrj.brRequestLinux2.9.2Support for modern Linux

Hello folks,

Can we have a better support under modern Linux distributions?

I'm trying to install elog in our webserver and it's becoming a boring task. First of all theres only RPM packages. And we really don't like the Red Hat method, so we use Debian Servers. More package mainteners would be nice.

 

The software appears to be working correctly, but there are some bugs (or perhaps missing dependencies?); the init script put in /etc/rc.d/init.d is broken under Debian:

First of all because it's in /etc/rc.d.

 

The second problem is in this line:

 

# Source function library.

#. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions

The file doesn't even exists.

 

The third problem is the echo_success; echo_failure commands that doesn't even exist. As I can see it's definitions are sourced in the functions file that doesn't exist.

 

After removing this missing commands or files from the init.d; I can call elogd script and start the daemon under root. Appears to be working...

 

And last but not least; there's a way to standardize the init script to run in other Linux distros, so we can put it to start automatically at boot time?

 

Many thanks in advance,

Vinícius Ferrão 

 

PS: I'm not asking to support any creepy distros, but to support the .deb package format and system style.

 

 

 

  Draft   Fri Apr 23 18:53:16 2021  Vinzenz Bildsteinvbildste@uoguelph.caQuestionLinuxa0924c1cd54913b 
  Draft   Mon Jul 4 12:32:01 2022  Vasiovasio.william@gmail.comInfoWindows Paid version

Good day all ,

does Elog has a paid version that is not open soureced 

 

regards


William Vasio 

  69539   Mon Jul 4 12:34:13 2022 Question Vasiovasio.william@gmail.comInfoWindows3.1.3Paid version

Good day all ,

does Elog has a paid version that is not open soureced 

 

regards


William Vasio 

  67408   Thu Dec 27 01:33:11 2012 Question ValentinValentin.Kozlov@kit.eduQuestionAll2.92How to put "Quote text" _below_ new message?

Hi there,

It seems that by default in a message created as "reply" of another message, the "quoted text" of the original entry is put at the _TOP_ of the new entry and not movable (Firefox 17, elog 2.92). I would strongly like to have it opposite, i.e. that one is able to create a new text first and only then has the "quoted text" since people are interested to see a new information and only then the previous messages as sort of "reminder". It was like this in older (2.6?) version but now I did not find how to change this default behavior. Did I miss something?

Cheers

Valentin

  490   Mon Mar 1 16:49:34 2004 Question Val Schmidtvschmidt@ldeo.columbia.eduQuestionLinuxelog-2.5.1-1top text/bottom text
Hello,

I have a quick question regarding how to display text using the "Top text" 
feature in the elogd.cfg file.  I've made an entry that looks like the 
following:

Top text = <h1>TEXT TO DISPLAY</h1>

But instead of getting just "TEXT TO DISPLAY" I get something like this:

----begin page ---
/usr/local/elog         "TEXT TO DISPLAY"

...rest of page 

----end page ---

...that is, on the far left at the top of the page in unformatted text 
is "/usr/local/elog/" prepended to the text I want do display. 

I don't know if this is a bug, or (more likely) something misconfigured in 
my setup. But any help that could be provided would be most greatful.

Thanks,

Val   
  492   Mon Mar 1 17:26:34 2004 Reply Val Schmidtvschmidt@ldeo.columbia.eduQuestionLinuxelog-2.5.1-1Re: top text/bottom text
> This was a bug which only occurs under certain conditions, that's why nobody 
> has seen it yet. I fixed it, the new version is available under CVS:
> 
> http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/src/elogd.c?rev=1.275

Great! 

I'm inclined to wait until you release a new rpm with the changes, as I'm 
likely to mucky things up by trying to upgrade from the cvs archive rather than 
using the rpm mechanics. 

But glad to hear it's fixed.  

By the way, ELOG is a fantastic tool. I'm very thankful for all the effort gone 
into it. I do wish there were standard sql hooks, as I'm a bit fearful of how 
it will scale. But the front-end, which is often most neglected, is well 
thought out.  Thanks so much, Val
  65677   Mon Dec 17 02:17:20 2007 Question Val Schmidtvschmidt@ccom.unh.eduQuestionMac OSX2.6.1Moving a logbook from one installation to another

I've attempted to move a logbook from an old elog installation to a new one on another system. The version of elog is the same (2.6.1) in both. Both systems have the same name and the logbooks are and installation are going in the same place. So all paths are identical. Also, for the new installation, I've simply recompiled the same sources used to install the original one. The only difference is an upgrade in the OS.
 
I've rsync'd the directory and contents from the old installation to the logbooks/ directory for the new one. I then over-wrote the standard config file with the new one. I then started elogd in the new place.
 
What I find is 
 
a) The default entry from the demo logbook is inserted into my logbook. This I can live with but it was unexpected.
b) The dates for all my entries as shown in my browser have years starting in 1946, rather than 2006. This is particularly odd since all of the actual log files have the correct dates. 
c) The numbering of entries has been reset to 1.
 
 
Can anyone explain what I've done to mucky this up and how to fix it?
 
Thanks in advance,
 
Val
 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6