'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:13:08 2003
|
It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
the message are removed.
I use elog-2.3.5
Alexander. |
Re: 'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 17:16:31 2003
|
> It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
> the message are removed.
>
> I use elog-2.3.5
>
> Alexander.
Please see elog:280 . I will releae 2.3.6 with this bugfix somewhen during
this week.
- Stefan |
problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:17:36 2003
|
It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
added to the web page. |
|
Re: 'Reply' removes attachments from the original message, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:20:19 2003
|
> > It seems when I use "reply" with an attachments, the original attachments of
> > the message are removed.
> >
> > I use elog-2.3.5
> >
> > Alexander.
>
> Please see elog:280 . I will releae 2.3.6 with this bugfix somewhen during
> this week.
>
> - Stefan
Wow! Fast reply!!! Thanks a lot! |
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 22 17:21:36 2003
|
> It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
> more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
> added to the web page.
Uhhh, Mr. "monster of number of attachments" gave it's stroke! Well, we never
had such large number of attachments so I forgot to put a waring in. The
limit comes from
#define MAX_ATTACHMENTS 20
in elogd.c which you can easily increase (as long as you have RAM!) and
recompile. |
|
Re: problem with 20+ attachments, posted by Alexander ZVYAGIN on Tue Apr 22 17:34:52 2003
|
> > It seems that maximal number of attachments is about 20. When you try to add
> > more, a new entry _is_ added to the logbook but the refernce to it is not
> > added to the web page.
>
> Uhhh, Mr. "monster of number of attachments" gave it's stroke!
:) I wanted to post a message with ~200 attachments.
>Well, we never
> had such large number of attachments so I forgot to put a waring in. The
> limit comes from
>
> #define MAX_ATTACHMENTS 20
>
> in elogd.c which you can easily increase (as long as you have RAM!) and
> recompile.
Actually my report was NOT about this limitation. You have it - it is fine.
The problem is that I add some 'zombies' or dead files to my logbook.
BTW is there a tool to check the 'integrity' of a logbook? That all
attachments are in place, there are no dead files, etc. I perfectly
understand that it is not _highly_ desired or needed, but with the two last
problems (auto-removing of attached files and silent adding a new ones with
20+ attachments) I have doubts that our logbook in a good state. And we just
started to use it. And I am still so excited about it!! |
Re: Converting logs, posted by Marcus Meyer on Tue Apr 22 19:27:28 2003
|
> I would like to dump mylog files into comma/tab seperated files. Is there
> an easy way to do it?
>
> I tried to run elconv, but had no success. Always returns an error.
>
> Thanks,
> k.
Hi!
Same for me.
Here is the error:
Cannot find any ??????.log file in this directory.
THANX,
mm |
|
Re: Converting logs, posted by Recai Oktas on Tue Apr 22 19:58:13 2003
|
> Here is the error:
>
> Cannot find any ??????.log file in this directory.
`elconv' is just a simple tool to convert pre 2.0 log files to the current
format. (Well, after all these confusions, dropping it from the future
releases won't be surprising -at least for me- ;) You might try some
well-known text-processing tools ie. preferably awk or perl to make the
required conversions. But I think using comma or tab as the delimiter is not
suitable due to the content of logs. If all you want is importing them to
excel/word, you should play with the delimiter options of mentioned programs
before trying a solution. |