| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
542
|
Fri May 14 06:19:40 2004 |
 | nait tauh | nait@no2bl.no-ip.com | Question | Linux | 2.5.2 | Using date and subst date |
I'm trying capture any edit/modified entry with the following, Using the
real date format instead of text string so that I could do a quick filter on it.
Type modified = date
Subst on Edit modified = $date
Problem: It seem that the Subst on Edit always default to 1 Jan 1970 instead
of current date on edit screen.
Could it be $date is a string and not compatible with tape date? or is there
a variable or function to convert $date to date format?
Thanks,
nait |
|
541
|
Tue May 11 19:35:11 2004 |
 | Marc Neiger | m.neiger@synergie-inf.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> > The snapshot version you sent me seems to be locked onto port 80 and does not honor
> > the port directive in elog.cfg....
>
> Thank you, I fixed that and updated the file.
Tested and working, thx. |
|
540
|
Tue May 11 11:18:24 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> The snapshot version you sent me seems to be locked onto port 80 and does not honor
> the port directive in elog.cfg....
Thank you, I fixed that and updated the file. |
|
539
|
Tue May 11 11:08:33 2004 |
| Marc Neiger | m.neiger@synergie-inf.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> > Is it possible to have a conditionnal attribute depend on an extendanble one ?
>
> In principle yes, but I never tried it...
The snapshot version you sent me seems to be locked onto port 80 and does not honor
the port directive in elog.cfg.... |
|
538
|
Tue May 11 10:44:55 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> Is it possible to have a conditionnal attribute depend on an extendanble one ?
In principle yes, but I never tried it... |
|
537
|
Tue May 11 10:42:44 2004 |
| Marc Neiger | m.neiger@synergie-inf.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
Hi Stefan,
Many thanks, it works. I'm impressed by your reactivity ! thanks again.
Is it possible to have a conditionnal attribute depend on an extendanble one ?
> > the use of extendable options in the global section seem to "crash" elogd
> > when creating a new entry.
> > My elogd.cfg is included
> > the problem attribute is "Client"
> > Should it be possible to have it extendable only in one specific logbook ?
>
> Actually it was never foreseen to have extendable options in the [global]
> section. I added now this functionality. The new windows version can be obtained
> under
>
> http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/windows/elogd-snapshot.exe |
|
536
|
Mon May 10 21:57:49 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> the use of extendable options in the global section seem to "crash" elogd
> when creating a new entry.
> My elogd.cfg is included
> the problem attribute is "Client"
> Should it be possible to have it extendable only in one specific logbook ?
Actually it was never foreseen to have extendable options in the [global]
section. I added now this functionality. The new windows version can be obtained
under
http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/windows/elogd-snapshot.exe |
|
535
|
Mon May 10 00:00:06 2004 |
| Marc Neiger | m.neiger@synergie-inf.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Extendable options |
Hi,
the use of extendable options in the global section seem to "crash" elogd
when creating a new entry.
My elogd.cfg is included
the problem attribute is "Client"
Should it be possible to have it extendable only in one specific logbook ?
Are extendable and conditionnal "compatible" on the same set of attributes ?
Cheers,
Marc |