elogd lost entry database without restart during file system trouble, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Thu Apr 30 09:54:17 2015
|
I'm running ELOG since several years with rather heavy usage.
Last week I've upgrades from 3.0.0 to 3.1.0 and this week I had twice the same problem:
elogd lost the index for old entries and showed empty logbooks, without having restarted.
|
Re: elogd lost entry database without restart during file system trouble, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 30 13:01:29 2015
|
First, I can only fix problems which are reproducible. Can we do another power outage at PSI again?
But seriously, I guess what happened is that elog sees an empty directory when the AFS server
|
|
Odd behaviour when attaching a file to an entry, posted by David Pilgram on Sun Apr 12 21:12:29 2015
|
Having installed v3.1.0 on a test logbook, I find that I can browse and select a file, but when I click on the "Upload" button, I get a pop-up
message from the browser asking me:
"This page is asking you to confirm that you want to leave - data you have entered may not be saved." |
|
Re: Odd behaviour when attaching a file to an entry, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 23 15:13:06 2015
|
This problem has been fixed in Version 3.1.0-2. Please upgrade.
David
Pilgram wrote:
Having installed v3.1.0 on a test logbook, I find that I can browse |
|
Re: Odd behaviour when attaching a file to an entry, posted by David Pilgram on Thu Apr 23 15:37:37 2015
|
Thanks Stefan, that did the trick.
Had a bit of an effort with the git repository, though, kept getting 403 errors when tried the
git clone https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog as per the "download" page. |
Max Logbooks for Email notify, posted by Oliver Kleinau on Wed Apr 8 11:40:27 2015
|
Hi,
we've got 109 logbooks in Elog. Whenever I set a notify for all logbooks in configuration menu it is limited to 73 entrys. After saving the
changes the rest of the entrys are cut off. |
|
Re: Max Logbooks for Email notify, posted by Oliver Kleinau on Fri Apr 10 08:37:19 2015
|
It seems to be the GET buffer of the elog-Server. The GET statement is cut off after &sub_lb72=1&sub_ eg. 1000 chars.
Oliver
Kleinau wrote:
Hi, |
|
Re: Max Logbooks for Email notify, posted by Oliver Kleinau on Fri Apr 10 09:59:42 2015
|
It was str variable in function process_http_request in elogd.c.
This should have the size of received buffer.
PROBLEM SOLVED!!! |
|
Re: Max Logbooks for Email notify, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 22 13:40:19 2015
|
Ok, I fixed this in the current GIT version. You might check if that works for you.
Oliver
Kleinau wrote:
It was str variable in function process_http_request in elogd.c. |
ELOG Version 3.1.0 announcement, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 2 15:44:33 2015
|
This is an announcement for the ELOG version 3.1.0 being released just now. Among several bug fixes and an improved Drag & Drop interface for attachments,
it contains a long awaited "autosave" feature.
Let's assume that you write an ELOG entry, and keep the window open for a longer time (like to write some shift notes over several hours). |
|
Re: ELOG Version 3.1.0 announcement, posted by Banata Wachid Ridwan on Wed Apr 15 04:02:41 2015
|
congrats, any detail changelog? I assume in software packages?
is it save just install and overwrite the old version?
Stefan |
|
Re: ELOG Version 3.1.0 announcement, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 15 09:01:04 2015
|
The changelog is here: http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/ChangeLog
It is save to install the new version over the old one.
|
Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Tim Schel on Mon Mar 30 14:46:28 2015 
|
Hello there,
I have been using ELOG for 4 years now and all of a sudden I see a strange behaviour.
|
|
Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Mar 30 17:48:06 2015
|
The (correct) display tells me that the colours are user-defined, probably by the configuration option
Style <attribute> <value> = <style>
|
|
Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Mar 31 11:36:25 2015
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]The (correct) display tells me that the colours are user-defined, probably by the configuration option
Style <attribute> <value> = <style>
|
|
Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 31 11:44:27 2015
|
[quote="Andreas Luedeke"]the content of a particular entry can change the rendering. If you have an HTML end tag like </table> or </font> in your entry,
then the display after that entry may be spoiled.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Apr 1 10:54:27 2015
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Andreas Luedeke"]the content of a particular entry can change the rendering. If you have an HTML end tag like </table> or </font>
in your entry, then the display after that entry may be spoiled.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 1 11:41:31 2015
|
[quote="Andreas Luedeke"]If the content has been added with the "elog" command as HTML then it can contain mismatching HTML tags, can't it?
I don't see how this could be avoided by ELOG, unless you want to do a full HTML syntax check of all new and modified entries.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Apr 1 18:31:28 2015
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Andreas Luedeke"]If the content has been added with the "elog" command as HTML then it can contain mismatching HTML tags, can't
it?
I don't see how this could be avoided by ELOG, unless you want to do a full HTML syntax check of all new and modified entries.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Apr 1 18:39:14 2015
|
Proof of principle ;-) |
|
Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome? </table>, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 1 20:25:21 2015
|
[quote="Andreas Luedeke"]Now I'm confused: if I create an entry with "elog -n 2 ...", then I put HTML code into elog and it is displayed as HTML. This HTML
code does NOT convert a "<" into "<", otherwise you could not display any HTML.
But of course this code can be wrongly formatted, for example it can contain a </table> tag without a <table> tag before it. This will definitely spoil |
|
Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Tim Schelfhout on Wed Apr 1 11:01:14 2015
|
Thank you all of you for your notes ...
Anyway I have no time at the present to debug this ... at the level of configuration file.
I discovered however that the Incognito Mode of Chrome does NOT seem to have this problem??
|
|
Permission to view, posted by Banata Wachid Ridwan on Fri Mar 20 08:22:38 2015
|
Hello,
related to the permission, is it possible to set permission ?, so only the owner or certain people can view list all logbok and regular member
can only see their own logbook, not the others. |
|
Re: Permission to view, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Mar 20 09:25:11 2015
|
Yes, it is possible. And explained in ELOG documentation.
Banata
Wachid Ridwan wrote:
Hello, |
|
Re: Permission to view, posted by Banata Wachid Ridwan on Fri Mar 27 05:39:29 2015
|
I just read all administrator guide especially in :
http://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#access
and I didnt find it that exactly match with my need, or maybe I read wrong section :P |
|
Re: Permission to view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 27 07:26:45 2015
|
You need
Password file = logbook.pwd
Login user = <name of allowed user(s)> |
|
Re: Permission to view, posted by Banata Wachid Ridwan on Fri Mar 27 08:19:56 2015
|
so if that is the solution, all user that not allowed cannot login and cannot fill logbook
in my case, user still can login and fill logbook but cannot see other user's data on the same logbook, so user only see their own data.
but few members have a special permission to see all. |
|
Re: Permission to view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 27 08:24:47 2015
|
No.
Banata
Wachid Ridwan wrote:
so if that is the solution, all user that not allowed cannot |
test, posted by Tim Schel on Wed Mar 25 10:36:15 2015
|
| zezerze |
Trouble to install ELOG V3.0.0-72a8401 in XP SP3, posted by Pedro Acosta on Mon Mar 23 17:02:03 2015
|
Hi,
It´s not possible to install the last version V3.0.0-72a8401 over XP SP3, the previous version works well. For Windows
Vista Home Basic SP2 work fine the last version. |
|
Re: Trouble to install ELOG V3.0.0-72a8401 in XP SP3, posted by Pedro Acosta on Tue Mar 24 19:08:34 2015
|
Maybe, nobody uses XP SP3 but i get Win32 invalid aplication error. Not work!
Pedro
Acosta wrote:
Hi, |