ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67209
|
Thu Mar 8 10:01:47 2012 |
| Olivier Callot | olivier.callot@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.0-2418 | Truncation of the displayed text in Summary view of the list of entries |
In the summary view, it seems that the text is truncated at the first "<" character. See https://lblogbook.cern.ch/Shift/48812 for a simple entry, then use the 'list' command to see that only a very small part is displayed. |
67257
|
Tue May 1 11:38:05 2012 |
| Per Eriksson | pelle@sm4xiu.eu | Request | Linux | Any | Compiling Elog for QNAP NAS x86 |
Hi All,
I am interested to have ELOG installed in my QNAP x86 based NAS (239 Pro II)
Have someone done this already or is there a write-up of a normal compile-procedure which I can have as a base when I attempt to compile?
Regards,
Per |
67358
|
Sat Oct 27 18:10:14 2012 |
| Philippe Rousselot | rousselot@rousselot.org | Question | Linux | Windows | latest | Comment avoir elog en français |
|
67426
|
Mon Jan 14 03:05:41 2013 |
| Bruce Weber | bruce.weber@inmarsat.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.8 | Dual Time display and entry times |
ELog has been installed on our local server which runs on local time (UTC +8) and is working well, however, we work in two time zones.
Our PC's run in local time (IT requirement) but need to save and display one log in UTC and one log in local time - can this be done?
Appreciate anyones help!
Thanks |
67509
|
Sat May 18 17:41:51 2013 |
| Norm | normthompson@yahoo.com | Bug report | Windows | Unknown | Application failed to initialize properly |
I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version. Around 2008 I believe. I then received an application failed to initialize properly 0xc0150002 after installing the newest version. I then tried installing the Feb 2013 version and received the same message. Panicked, I rolled back our server to its state yesterday. I would like to update our elog software, anyone know why I am receiving this error?? |
67521
|
Mon Jun 3 15:44:46 2013 |
| Martin Rongen | martin.rongen@rwth-aachen.de | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Daemonizing vs. shell execution |
Hi all
I have setup an logbook that executes a number of shell scripts to preset attributes and append standart information, which works great. Now I am trying to daemonise the whole thing. I have tried the -D option as well as daemontools. In both cases the logbook itself is functional but the bash scripts do not get executed.
Any ideas how I can resolve this problem?
Martin |
67537
|
Mon Jun 24 15:46:43 2013 |
| Martin Rongen | martin.rongen@rwth-aachen.de | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Enforce new thumbnails |
Hi everyone
The past few days I have been editing elogd.c to link all image files to the PIXLR-API (http://pixlr.com/). I am now at a point where the edited images are uploaded fine to the elog server, but in order for the thumbnails to refresh one needs to click edit and thus load the FCKeditor for the corresponding entry.
Any suggestions how I may be able to enforce thumbnail generation, whenever the entry is displayed.
An alternative way might be to get the original entry id associated to an attachment, but I have not been able to achieve this either.
Best regards
Martin |
67681
|
Fri Mar 28 14:29:24 2014 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Info | Linux | 2.9.2-a738 | A couple of observations |
Hi Stefan and Andreas,
When I submitted the previous entry, I had an error message about not able to send via psxxxx.psi.ch come up as
a red bar at the top of the elog page - sorry, cannot remember the subdomain name correctly.
The observations I was going to make is firstly the change in layout of the Find section - maybe I'll get used
to it but the change in layout wasn't warmly welcomed.
Also, shame that moving from Subversion means that the increments are no longer in easy numerical order. So I
believe that I am commenting on the latest possible version available, a738232.
A question. My logbooks directory is now 1.8GB. Yes, there are a lot of attachments etc to bulk it out, but
it's all plain text comments. Is there a limit as to the size, or total number of entries? Elog takes a
notible amount of time to index it all these days, and I have wondered whether a couple of "instabilities" might
be caused by this. Anyone any thoughts?
I don't know how I managed it, but I got elog to generate two entries with the identical ID no. The new entries
were different as well. The log file faithfully had recorded the two separate replies to the entry having the
same ID no as well. Unfortunately I went and corrected it by editing the YYMMDDa.log file without keeping a
copy. I have also had a mysterious entry ID0 appear in threaded display, despite there being no entry 0; and if
it appears, it appears in two or three places within the list of threaded entries. |