| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1720
|
Thu Feb 23 12:06:44 2006 |
 | Holger Mundhahs | holger.mundhahs@vtg-rail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.1-1653 | Comment <attr>/Tooltip <attr> not shown in detail view | I've defined a comment or a tooltip for an attribute.
But the text is only shown in NEW/EDIT/REPLY mode, not in detail view.
Is this a bug or how can I enable the text (especially Comment) in
this view? |
|
68147
|
Fri Oct 23 03:36:18 2015 |
| Dawang | raymund.dawang@gmail.com | Request | Windows | Latest | Columns numeric input are added/computed | Hi Stefan,
Good day. I'm thinking if this wishlist is already available in elog. The values in columns we're added or computed according to formula set in a single separate column.
Thanks,
Raymund |
|
66659
|
Sat Jan 2 01:34:57 2010 |
 | Gabriele Sirri | sirri@bo.infn.it | Request | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | Collapse to Last and Quick Filter | Hello,
I feel that the filter result could be confusing and unexpected when "COLLAPSE TO LAST" is enabled: you
filter the first entry but you show the last one. What is filtered doesn't correspond with what is shown (look
the attached example).
I suggest to implement an option to let the user decide which entry (first or last) should be retrieved for
filtering (a tentative patch is attached).
Thank you
Gabriele
P.S. A similar behaviour occurs when you sort the logbook: it could appear as not sorted because you sort the
first entry but the last one is shown. |
| Attachment 1: example.txt
|
Example:
Consider the Status attribute to define the progress of a task:
Attributes = Author, Task, Status
Options Status = Start, Step1, Step2, End
Thread Display = Task, Status
and logbook with three thread arranged like this:
|-- Task0, Start
| |-- Task0, Step1
| |-- Task0, Step2
|
|-- Task1, Start
| |-- Task1, Step1
|
|-- Task2, Start
It is collapsed to:
+-- Task0, Step2
+-- Task1, Step1
|-- Task2, Start
Now, if you filter the Status using the "Start" value, you obtain again:
+-- Task0, Step2
+-- Task1, Step1
|-- Task2, Start
In my opinion, this is a bit confusing.
Using Step1 or Step2 values, nothing is selected (also confusing).
|
| Attachment 2: elogd.c.patch
|
Index: elogd.c
===================================================================
--- elogd.c (revisione 2280)
+++ elogd.c (copia locale)
@@ -19539,6 +19539,19 @@
if (status != EL_SUCCESS)
break;
+ if ( getcfg(lbs->name, "Filter last entry", str, sizeof(str)) && atoi(str) == 1 ) {
+ /* search last entry in this thread */
+ if (reply_to[0]) {
+ search_last_reply(msg_list[index].lbs, &message_id);
+ size = TEXT_SIZE;
+ status =
+ el_retrieve(msg_list[index].lbs, message_id, date, attr_list, attrib, lbs->n_attr, text,
+ &size, in_reply_to, reply_to, attachment, encoding, locked_by);
+ if (status != EL_SUCCESS)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
/* apply filter for attributes */
for (i = 0; i < lbs->n_attr; i++) {
|
|
1196
|
Fri Jun 17 20:30:53 2005 |
| Gerfried Kumbartzki | kum@physics.rutgers.edu | Question | Linux | 2.6.0 | Cloning | Elog is installed on a laptop (Redhat Linux 2.4.20-8) for quite a while. I like to have a "base" of that logbook on a server and keep it
in sync. Mirroring seem to be the perfect solution. For that I updated to elog v2.6.0 yesterday.
The server is an Alpha running Linux Redhat 7.1. I compiled from elog-latest.tar and installed elog in the 'same' locations as on the laptop.
Created a user elog and a group elog, put elogd.cfg, themes, logbooks ... in /usr/local/elog, owned by elog. Started the elogd, tested,
all seems to work. The elogd.cfg has a read and write passwd set. Any user can access the logbook, read and write after providing the proper user id and password.
Next I wanted to clone the logbooks from the laptop to the server. As superuser I can start elogd -v -C http://latop:8080, but get stuck right away with "Cannot contact elogd at http://laptop:8080/"
As user it works as follows:
Remote configuration successfully received.
Option "Mirror server = http://wotan.rutgers.edu:8080" added to config file.
Logbook directory "logbooks" successfully created.
Created directory "demo"
Indexing logbook "demo" ... Found empty logbook "demo"
Created directory "tfexp"
Indexing logbook "tfexp" ... Found empty logbook "tfexp"
Retrieve remote logbook entries? [y]/n:
Retrieving entries from "http://wotan.rutgers.edu:8080/demo"...
ID1: Remote entry received
Retrieving entries from "http://wotan.rutgers.edu:8080/tfexp"...
Error accessing remote logbook
Cloning finished. Check elogd.cfg and start the server normally.
Allthough, tfexp contains a number of entries all owned by elog like the entry in demo.
Beside missing the real stuff everything ends up in the users home directory. I would like it in the general area (/usr/local/elog for instance).
The other option is to use synchronize after changing [global] from with in the browser. Start elogd, open the logbook and click on config,
enter a Mirror server = http://laptop:8080/
Clicking synchronize give "Error accessing remote logbook"
Again, the logbooks are on both machines in /usr/local/elog/logbooks (owner:group elog:elog). The tfexp in this case is passwd protected.
Any user can access the elogs in both machines, locally or remote. But, I'm unable to synchronize the two.
Maybe somebody can point me in the right direction.
Thank's Gerfried |
|
67027
|
Tue Mar 15 21:38:01 2011 |
| Louis de Leseleuc | louis.deleseleuc@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.0 | Cleaning up attachments | I noticed a behavior that might be irritating.
After attaching/uploading files to an entry and before submitting it, one might press 'Back' or close the browser window.
This in effect cancels the entry and sends into oblivion. HOWEVER the attachments and their thumbnail files remain on the server forever.
Would there be a way to either delete attachments after some time if they don't show up in an entry? Or some other magic trick with the browser? My logbook directories are already full of orphan files that I need to seek and destroy.
Also, any thoughts on automatically cleaning up a logbook directory when the damage is done?
Louis |
|
2108
|
Wed Jan 10 22:54:56 2007 |
 | Exaos Lee | Exaos.Lee@gmail.com | Info | All | SVN1780 | Chinese language files updated | As the attachment.
Sorry for no update long time. |
| Attachment 1: eloglang-zh_CN.tgz
|
|
66428
|
Wed Jul 1 17:00:30 2009 |
 | Richard Stamper | r.stamper@rl.ac.uk | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.6-2227 | Checks on datetime seconds field generate warning in IE7 | When adding a log entry containing a datetime field using the IE7 browser a Javascript warning is displayed - see the attachment. This is due to a change in the naming of the "seconds" field of a datetime entry (made in version 2143) not being propagated to the code that generates the Javascript that checks the supplied values.
Suggested patch follows.
Change "s%d" to "c%d" in lines 9675 and 9678.
Showing lines 9675-9680 below, change from:
rsprintf(" if (document.form1.s%d.value == \"\") {\n", i);
sprintf(str, loc("Please enter second for attribute '%s'"), attr_list[i]);
rsprintf(" alert(\"%s\");\n", str);
rsprintf(" document.form1.s%d.focus();\n", i);
rsprintf(" return false;\n");
rsprintf(" }\n");
to:
rsprintf(" if (document.form1.c%d.value == \"\") {\n", i);
sprintf(str, loc("Please enter second for attribute '%s'"), attr_list[i]);
rsprintf(" alert(\"%s\");\n", str);
rsprintf(" document.form1.c%d.focus();\n", i);
rsprintf(" return false;\n");
rsprintf(" }\n");
Regards,
Richard Stamper |
| Attachment 1: Javascript_warning.jpg
|
|
|
67474
|
Thu Apr 4 17:47:12 2013 |
| Daniel Campora | dcampora@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Checking logging before posting | Hi there,
Here's a bit of a special scenario. There's no server-side check the user is logged in upon posting, but it rather seems the server relies on the post data sent from the form.
An example of this can be triggered on a write restricted elog, by hitting on New and logging out in another tab. Then posting, from the first tab, will post as if the user was logged on. Hitting back and posting again also works.
Cheers |
|