Re: speeding up elog : gcc compile optimizations, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 28 15:03:17 2004
|
> I noticed that the gcc compiler options in the tarball Makefile were not
> conducive to speed. There, I tried changing the gcc options to:
>
|
Re: speeding up elog : gcc compile optimizations, posted by Fred Hooper on Sat Jul 31 16:55:21 2004
|
> > I noticed that the gcc compiler options in the tarball Makefile were not
> > conducive to speed. There, I tried changing the gcc options to:
> >
|
Re: speeding up elog : gcc compile optimizations, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Aug 2 09:05:48 2004
|
> Is there something else which is making this difficult to do?
Not really, but hsearch() & Co. are not available under Windows, so I have to extract the
|
Re: speeding up elog : gcc compile optimizations, posted by Drew on Tue Aug 3 16:59:36 2004
|
> > Is there something else which is making this difficult to do?
>
> Not really, but hsearch() & Co. are not available under Windows, so I have to extract the
|
text display of ascii files not a good idea, posted by Heiko Scheit on Mon Aug 23 13:43:58 2004
|
I think the text display of ASCII files, which is new in version
2.5.4, is not a good idea. E.g. I had a large ps file attached
to one entry and it took a long time display this entry (over DSL).
|
Re: text display of ascii files not a good idea, posted by T. Ribbrock on Tue Sep 7 13:05:49 2004
|
[...]
> Probably it is fine to display only files ending in '.txt' per default.
> In addition a file that has more than say 1000 lines should probably
|
Re: text display of ascii files not a good idea, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Sep 8 13:46:56 2004
|
> [...]
> > Probably it is fine to display only files ending in '.txt' per default.
> > In addition a file that has more than say 1000 lines should probably
|
Re: text display of ascii files not a good idea, posted by Heiko Scheit on Wed Sep 8 23:35:01 2004
|
> > [...]
> > > Probably it is fine to display only files ending in '.txt' per default.
> > > In addition a file that has more than say 1000 lines should probably
|