ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66414
|
Thu Jun 25 10:09:18 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug fix | All | 2.7.6-2191 | Re: Auto-increment substitutions broken with records for multiple days | > An alternative patch:
>
> /* if date part matches */
> if (strlen(attrib[index]) > 0 && strncmp(attrib[index], retstr, loc) == 0)
> /* retrieve old index */
> if (atoi(attrib[index] + loc) > old_index)
> old_index = atoi(attrib[index] + loc);
>
> does not make this assumption and also appears to work OK when I test it.
Yes, this is the right one, it searches all entries to have the same date than the current one, and then looks for the
largest index which will be stored in old_index and later incremented by one. I committed your patch to the
repository. Thanks a lot. |
66638
|
Thu Dec 3 20:25:50 2009 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug fix | Linux | 2.7.7 | elogd keeps crashing, any thoughts? | We are trying to track down an issue where elogd just stops, and I cannot seem to find a cause.
In the logs, I see:
Dec 3 14:01:23 nissrv18a kernel: [419738.139675] elogd[32003]: segfault at 4 ip 00007f183b19b560 sp 00007fff79f5e278 error 4
in libc-2.10.1.so[7f183b119000+166000]
Any thoughts? |
66639
|
Fri Dec 4 23:45:56 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug fix | Linux | 2.7.7 | Re: elogd keeps crashing, any thoughts? |
Allen wrote: |
We are trying to track down an issue where elogd just stops, and I cannot seem to find a cause.
In the logs, I see:
Dec 3 14:01:23 nissrv18a kernel: [419738.139675] elogd[32003]: segfault at 4 ip 00007f183b19b560 sp 00007fff79f5e278 error 4
in libc-2.10.1.so[7f183b119000+166000]
Any thoughts?
|
I need more information about that. Please have a look at Faq #19. |
67069
|
Fri May 20 22:45:00 2011 |
| John M O'Donnell | odonnell@lanl.gov | Bug fix | Linux | svn 2414 | my_shell (OS_UNIX) uses /tmp/elog_shell - conflict when more than one elogd runs at the same time | all instances of elogd use the same file name in /tmp when calling my_shell. This can cause some inconsistent behavior when two or more copies of elogd are runnnig at the same time. (eg. one might detect ImageMagik is installed, and the other not,)
The propsed solution is to have the parent read from a pipe to the child rather from a file. A patch is attached. |
67123
|
Tue Sep 13 13:38:19 2011 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug fix | Linux | 2.9.0-2414 | Re: Elog crashes with URL find npp=0 | > [...] It appears that npp=0 crashes elogd [...]
Here's a patch: search for "npp" in src/elogd.c and add the following line:
if (n_page<=0) n_page = 20;
Here's the diff output for version 2.9.0-2414
*** 20092,20096 ****
if (isparam("npp"))
n_page = atoi(getparam("npp"));
+ if (n_page<=0) n_page = 20;
if (page_mid) { |
67184
|
Sat Feb 11 05:43:33 2012 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug fix | Linux | Windows | 2.9.0 | Re: ssl problems |
John Doroshenko wrote: |
Olaf Kasten wrote: |
Hi there,
I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't connect to the elog server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg.
I tested with Firefox 3.6 and IE 7 installations and there are no problems.
I guess it's a bug. Does someone have a suggestion to solve that problem?
Thx. Olaf
|
Hi!
This just started happening here also. Some users can't get on to a SSL=1 config'd elog using either IE or firefox 10 (win7 or linux) or chrome. SAFARI works. Occurs in 2.8.0 and a newly built (even after
ssl yum updates) 2.9.0 version on SL5.5 system. Seems to accept self signed cert then nothing.. (connection reset message). Tried an stunnel from one port to port running elog
with SSL=0. Same behavior. Doesn't work on some browsers. Any clues?
Thanks,
-John
|
Hi everyone,
it appears that many people have this problem. I believe this is simply a problem of your firewall settings. There are two simple checks you can do to test if I'm right or wrong:
- Run your logbook on the standard port 443 and retry. If the special port has been opened on the firewall, it has been likely only opened for specific clients like firefox 3.6, IE 7, etc. If you use a different client (FF 10, IE 9) the port can be blocked.
- Or just run the browser that does not work on the ELOG server. If it works to access ELOG via localhost, then you know for sure that it is the firewall.
I've actually tested it here at my institute: I've downloaded firefox 10 and could access ELOG on port 443 but couldn't access it on port 444, unless I've started FF10 on the ELOG host.
To John, Olaf and Christian: If you need to be able to use a special port and a certain set of browsers then just contact your computing division or whoever maintains your firewalls.
I hope this settles the matter.
Cheers
Andreas
 ⇄
Detect language » English
PS: I've solved this with the help of google : have a look at http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2295421#2295421 about firewalls |
67186
|
Sat Feb 11 22:05:36 2012 |
| Christian Herzog | herzog@phys.ethz.ch | Bug fix | Linux | Windows | 2.9.0 | Re: ssl problems |
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
John Doroshenko wrote: |
Olaf Kasten wrote: |
Hi there,
I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't connect to the elog server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg.
I tested with Firefox 3.6 and IE 7 installations and there are no problems.
I guess it's a bug. Does someone have a suggestion to solve that problem?
Thx. Olaf
|
Hi!
This just started happening here also. Some users can't get on to a SSL=1 config'd elog using either IE or firefox 10 (win7 or linux) or chrome. SAFARI works. Occurs in 2.8.0 and a newly built (even after
ssl yum updates) 2.9.0 version on SL5.5 system. Seems to accept self signed cert then nothing.. (connection reset message). Tried an stunnel from one port to port running elog
with SSL=0. Same behavior. Doesn't work on some browsers. Any clues?
Thanks,
-John
|
Hi everyone,
it appears that many people have this problem. I believe this is simply a problem of your firewall settings. There are two simple checks you can do to test if I'm right or wrong:
- Run your logbook on the standard port 443 and retry. If the special port has been opened on the firewall, it has been likely only opened for specific clients like firefox 3.6, IE 7, etc. If you use a different client (FF 10, IE 9) the port can be blocked.
- Or just run the browser that does not work on the ELOG server. If it works to access ELOG via localhost, then you know for sure that it is the firewall.
I've actually tested it here at my institute: I've downloaded firefox 10 and could access ELOG on port 443 but couldn't access it on port 444, unless I've started FF10 on the ELOG host.
To John, Olaf and Christian: If you need to be able to use a special port and a certain set of browsers then just contact your computing division or whoever maintains your firewalls.
I hope this settles the matter.
Cheers
Andreas
 ⇄
Detect language » English
PS: I've solved this with the help of google : have a look at http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2295421#2295421 about firewalls
|
Hi all,
it is NOT the firewall. First off, I don't use a firewall. 2. I AM our computing division. 3. if it were the firewall blocking the access, why do I see "TCP connection broken" in the elog log file? 4. it's not working on port 443 either.
Something's flaky in elog's https implementation. For me it's not a big deal any more, as I use an apache reverse proxy in production now anyway, but other people may not.
thanks,
-Christian |
67188
|
Sat Feb 11 22:19:07 2012 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug fix | Linux | Windows | 2.9.0 | Re: ssl problems |
Christian Herzog wrote: |
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi everyone,
it appears that many people have this problem. I believe this is simply a problem of your firewall settings. There are two simple checks you can do to test if I'm right or wrong:
- Run your logbook on the standard port 443 and retry. If the special port has been opened on the firewall, it has been likely only opened for specific clients like firefox 3.6, IE 7, etc. If you use a different client (FF 10, IE 9) the port can be blocked.
- Or just run the browser that does not work on the ELOG server. If it works to access ELOG via localhost, then you know for sure that it is the firewall.
I've actually tested it here at my institute: I've downloaded firefox 10 and could access ELOG on port 443 but couldn't access it on port 444, unless I've started FF10 on the ELOG host.
To John, Olaf and Christian: If you need to be able to use a special port and a certain set of browsers then just contact your computing division or whoever maintains your firewalls.
[...] |
[...] it is NOT the firewall. First off, I don't use a firewall. 2. I AM our computing division. 3. if it were the firewall blocking the access, why do I see "TCP connection broken" in the elog log file? 4. it's not working on port 443 either.
Something's flaky in elog's https implementation. For me it's not a big deal any more, as I use an apache reverse proxy in production now anyway, but other people may not. [...]
|
⇄
Detect language » English
Just for curiosity: did you try to start the non-working web-browser locally on the server? |
|