> Acknowledged. Added your vote to the wishlist.

Thanks!

> > I get the following in my THREADED logbook view:
> > 
> > "Adding new services, planned for 1090519200. Last revised: Thu Jul 15
> > 18:03:52 2004"
> 
> That should be fixed by the current version. Please update.

Thanks!

> > With the "Preset text = " specified, when re-editing a logbook entry (say to
> > correct a spelling error) the text of the "Message" is replicated and placed
> > directly below the original text.
> 
> That should be fixed since revision 1.370 from Jul 7th, 2004. Please update.

Thanks!

> according to the users guide,
> 
> http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Database/?cmd=New&pType=PC
> 
> should create an entry with the type value set to PC, but this doesn't work

Thanks!

> Ok, I added the option
> 
> Tooltip <attribute> = ...
> 
> I apply the HTML "title" tag to the whole table row, so the tooltip appears on the
> whole line, not only the attribute name. I guess this is much more intuitive. Give
> it a try. New version under CVS and available as a snapshot.

I like the implementation, especially with the tooltip popping up anywhere in the
area.  Thanks.

> > I was trying to do some hard coded spaces using:
> > 
> > Thread display = For: $Date for Shutdown.   $DataCenter:
> > $short summary. Coordinator: $Shutdown Coordinator.
> > 
> > The spacing actually works mthe first time, but upon going back into editing
> > the config file, the coded spaces are gone, replaced with real spaces, and
> > when saved all real multiple spaces are, as one would expect, ignored.  The
> > spacing reverts back to normal.
> > 
> > I tried other html tags but these show up as literals.
> 
> I fixed that in revision 1.448. The problem also showed up even in normal
> logbook entry displays and in replies (before this fix, the   in this text
> whould not have shown up). Get the new version from CVS.

As always - fantastic!

Thanks

> > The help text on the website says the following:
> > 
> > "The command Select can be used to select multiple messages for deletion of
> > moving to other logbooks."
> > 
> > This is not clear but was the intent to indicate that SELECT can be used to
> > either select multiple log entries for deletion OR for moving to another
> > logbook?  If the latter, then this does not work if one adds the MOVE TO
> > menu item to the list.  If the former then the helptext is a little misleading.
> 
> SELECT can be used for deletion OR moving OR copying. To enable the copy and move
> commands, they have to be present in the "Menu commands" list, like
> 
> Menu commands = Back, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Find, Config, Logout, Move to, Copy
> to, Help
> 
> I added an appropriate note to the documentation, sorry for the misleading descriptoin.

Thank you.  I had added the "Move To" and this works at the log entry level (i.e., "Move
To <name>) but in the threaded view one does not get the enumerated list of logbooks.

I'll play around with it a little more before re-posting.  When it didn't work as I
expected I read the docs and ran across the confusing text - so I stopped and asked!

Thanks again.

> > I'm not sure if this is a configuration problem or a bug, but running
> > v2.5.4subver1.413, elogd runs as user ROOT (UID0) even though the following
> > is in the elogd.cfd file:
> > 
> > Usr = nobody
> > Grp = essadm
> > 
> > All other directives added to the cfg file work, so I know eLog is reading
> > the cfg file.  
> > 
> > The elogd binary *is not* setuid 0.
> 
> I could not reproduce your problem with the current version (Revision 1.460)
> under Linux. I guess you made sure that user "nobody" and group "essadm" exist.
> Try to run elogd interactively, if you see any error message (without "-D"
> flag). In the most recent version (1.460), I added some more debugging code
> which tells you if elogd successfully fell back to another user, if you use the
> "-v" (verbose) flag.
> 
> If all that does not help, I guess it's some peculiarity of Solaris. Maybe
> someone else using Solaris has some idea. All elogd does is a call to 
> 
> setuser("<user>");
> 
> I see no reason why this should not work on Solaris.

Ok, just checking.  I will fiddle around with running it interactively and see what
I get, plus I'll have a look at the setuser function under Solaris.

Just for grins, what version of compiler are you using under Linux?

Thanks again!