Re: a bug and a question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 11 10:36:09 2002
|
> If you have only one entry in the logbook and have it set up in threaded
> mode like: ?cmd=Search&mode=threaded&reverse=1, when you click on the icon
> of the entry or the number of the entry to see it, it does not allow you
|
|
Re: Conditional E-Mail Attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Oct 10 08:52:50 2006
|
[quote="Grant Jeffcote"]My version shows V2.6.2-1699.
I noticed you have 1714, is that the latest binary or your compiled CVS release?
[/quote]
|
Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Mon Oct 16 16:20:06 2006
|
Hi Stefan,
I have posted an entry of approximately a thousand lines (ten thousand words). Posting it took some time, which is logical to a certain degree. However, |
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Oct 16 16:53:43 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]I have posted an entry of approximately a thousand lines (ten thousand words). Posting it took some time, which is logical
to a certain degree. However, whenever a user asks for "Full" view of the logbook, the page takes around two minutes to load and the CPU usage on the elog
server goes to beyond 90% for all this time. Is this to be expected for an entry of that size or is there something going wrong here?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Oct 16 17:18:58 2006
|
I improved the performance by some factor in SVN revision 1733. Can you give it a try and report your speed improvement? Depending on the result, I can
probably do even a bit better with some more effort.
|
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Mon Oct 16 17:32:58 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]I improved the performance by some factor in SVN revision 1733. Can you give it a try and report your speed improvement? Depending
on the result, I can probably do even a bit better with some more effort.
|
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Tue Oct 17 14:39:29 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
The problem lies in the ELCode parsing. When you post an entry in ELCode form, the elogd server has to parse every word to see if it's any of the ELcode
tags. This is right now implemented in a kind of poor way, such that it takes very long for long entries. I will work to optimize that. In the meantime, |
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Oct 17 14:42:58 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]I was wondering what is the cleanest way of changing old entries already submitted in ELCode into plain text. If I do not include
ELCode in the allowed encodings does this apply to already submitted entries as well or will they still be treated as ELCode?[/quote]
|