After THREE tries to enter a long detailed list of questions, all have been 
replaced by just one:  why do ELOG textareas and entry forms lose all data 
if the browser goes back/forward?  Or if a submission causes an error?  
Other forms in other applications don't have this kind of data loss.

Submitting this now before I lose it again.  Will submit rest of questions 
as separate entries.

Hi,

I have been using elog for a few years and it is a wonderfull software and has been one that I can't go without. So thank you very much for making it. 

After about a year, I upgraded to the latest version. I noticed that it causes the system to crash. It doesn't seem to happen that often. 

I have installed this on 2 machines, one Windows 10 and one on Windows 7. Over the last week I got one BSOD on each OS. 

The elogs have different configs and logbooks. One is a simple elog that doesn't have any attachments or anything funky. Just straight text.

Please see attached a screenshot of the Memory.DMP which has happned seconds after an schedule restarted the elog service on my PC. 

I will keep monitoring and see if will happen again. But I thought I log it here anyway.

Thanks.

Cheers.

Ales.

Hi,

I am using the # character to generate automatically incrementing numbers for new messages.

My issue is that # is evaluated when you hit "New" but E-log is only aware of the new value being used when you hit "Submit".

So, two E-logs can have the same value substituted for # if two E-logs are being edited in parallel.

Maybe someone has a solution to this ?

Soren Poulsen

Is there any way to automatically export the logbook(s)? 

With a logbook defined by 

 [test]
 Theme = default
 Comment = Test of auto-increment
 Attributes = Batch
 Subst Batch = %Y%m%d-##

the auto-incrementing of the Batch attribute within dates works when the logbook contains only entries for
today's date but otherwise will give a batch number of "01" for each entry.  

Changing line 8714 of elogd.c as follows, from:

      /* if date part changed, start over with index */
      if (strlen(attrib[index]) > 0 && strncmp(attrib[index], retstr, loc) != 0)
         old_index = 0;   
      else
         /* retrieve old index */
      if (atoi(attrib[index] + loc) > old_index)
         old_index = atoi(attrib[index] + loc);
to
      /* if date part changed, start over with index */
      if (strlen(attrib[index]) > 0 && strncmp(attrib[index], retstr, loc) != 0)
         break;            /* <------------- */
      else
         /* retrieve old index */
      if (atoi(attrib[index] + loc) > old_index)
         old_index = atoi(attrib[index] + loc);

appears to fix this bug when I test it.  This code is inside a loop stepping back through all log entries, and
the variable old_index is already set to zero before the loop. The existing code resets old_index whenever the
prefix of the attribute string (containing a date) does not match the "current" value of that prefix as found in
retstr (set using strftime).  So, if there are any records for dates other than today then old_index is reset
and attribute values will be set with the counter = (old_index+1) = 1.  The modified version stops comparisons
once a different date is seen, but assumes that records are date ordered.  An alternative patch:

      /* if date part matches */
      if (strlen(attrib[index]) > 0 && strncmp(attrib[index], retstr, loc) == 0)
          /* retrieve old index */
         if (atoi(attrib[index] + loc) > old_index)
            old_index = atoi(attrib[index] + loc);
  
does not make this assumption and also appears to work OK when I test it.