ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
170
|
Wed Nov 27 07:22:07 2002 |
| tony summerfelt | snowzone25@yahoo.com | | | | Re: upgrading |
> Ooops, I just realized that the Windows 2.2.3 distribution contained the old
> (2.2.2) executable for elogd.exe. I apologize for that. I have updated the
that's ok. i just it was driving me nuts there for a while...everything is fine now...
i've tried other web based msg boards, but i keep coming back to elog... |
189
|
Tue Jan 7 17:48:25 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | | | New directory scheme from version 2.2.5 on |
Starting from version 2.2.5 on, an new directory scheme has been
implemented. The idea is to separate the config file from the theme/icon
and the logbook directories. This can now be achieved by specifying the
configuration file via the "-c" flag and the directories with the "-d" flag
for the logbook root and the "resource directory" with the "-s" flag.
Alternatively, the resouce and logbook directories can be specified in the
configuration file with
Resource dir = ...
Logbook dir = ...
The old "Data dir" statement is still possible but deprecated. Instead, the
statement "Subdir = ..." should be used which is taken relative to
the "Logbook dir". If no "Subdir" is given, the logbook name itself is used
as the subdir. For this demo logbook I use now:
[global]
...
Resource dir = /usr/local/elogdemo
Logbook dir = /usr/local/elogdemo/logbooks
and no "Data dir" statements any more. The logbooks "Linux", "Database"
and "Forum" are then located at
/usr/local/elogdemo/logbooks/Linux
/usr/local/elogdemo/logbooks/Database
/usr/local/elogdemo/logbooks/Forum
respectively. The help, theme and icon files are located at their old
position ("themes" is automatically added to the "resource dir" as it was
before). |
190
|
Tue Jan 7 17:49:40 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | | | "User" and "Group" statements changed from Version 2.2.5 |
From Version 2.2.5 on, the configuration file entries
User = ...
Group = ...
have been changed to
Usr = ...
Grp = ...
in order not to conflict with the new "Group = ..." option which is used by
hierarchical logbooks. |
223
|
Tue Feb 18 08:07:10 2003 |
| Nick | nikc@cnic.com | | | | New Version |
I noticed the site has been updated as far as the documentation for 2.3.1,
however the latest version in the downloads section is 2.3.0, any other
places where I can get 2.3.1
Cheers |
224
|
Tue Feb 18 09:21:34 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | | | Re: New Version |
> I noticed the site has been updated as far as the documentation for 2.3.1,
> however the latest version in the downloads section is 2.3.0, any other
> places where I can get 2.3.1
>
> Cheers
Patience, patience! 2.3.1 is currently kind of in "beta" version, but will be
released this week. Not that you can always get the latest snapshot from the
CVS tree at
http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/src/elogd.c
- Stefan |
226
|
Wed Feb 19 09:26:04 2003 |
| Tomas Rudolf | tomas@mba.be | | | | Participation on development of ELOG |
Stefan,
We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful
application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your
source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.
I was wondering if there is a way we could coordinate the development
together. For instance, would it be of your interest to receive the code
adaptations we do and implement it in your future releases?
To be more specific, for the moment we are really interested in
implementing the SHELL script execution on the server (I noticed it is in
your wishlist).
Best regards,
Tomas Rudolf
Micro Belgium Application |
227
|
Wed Feb 19 09:37:30 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | | | Re: Participation on development of ELOG |
> We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful
> application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your
> source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.
>
> I was wondering if there is a way we could coordinate the development
> together. For instance, would it be of your interest to receive the code
> adaptations we do and implement it in your future releases?
Sure, I'm very interested in those and ready to merge it into the main
development tree.
- Stefan |
229
|
Wed Feb 19 09:54:38 2003 |
| Tomas Rudolf | tomas@mba.be | | | | Re: Participation on development of ELOG |
> > We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful
> > application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your
> > source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.
> >
> > I was wondering if there is a way we could coordinate the development
> > together. For instance, would it be of your interest to receive the code
> > adaptations we do and implement it in your future releases?
>
> Sure, I'm very interested in those and ready to merge it into the main
> development tree.
>
> - Stefan
Thanx for your quick answer.
I'll keep you updated as we move ahead with the development.
Tomas |