Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 786 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Categorydown OS ELOG Version Subject
  170   Wed Nov 27 07:22:07 2002 Cool tony summerfeltsnowzone25@yahoo.com   Re: upgrading
> Ooops, I just realized that the Windows 2.2.3 distribution contained the old 
> (2.2.2) executable for elogd.exe. I apologize for that. I have updated the 

that's ok. i just it was driving me nuts there for a while...everything is fine now...

i've tried other web based msg boards, but i keep coming back to elog...
  189   Tue Jan 7 17:48:25 2003 Idea Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.ch   New directory scheme from version 2.2.5 on
Starting from version 2.2.5 on, an new directory scheme has been 
implemented. The idea is to separate the config file from the theme/icon 
and the logbook directories. This can now be achieved by specifying the 
configuration file via the "-c" flag and the directories with the "-d" flag 
for the logbook root and the "resource directory" with the "-s" flag.

Alternatively, the resouce and logbook directories can be specified in the 
configuration file with

Resource dir = ...
Logbook dir = ...

The old "Data dir" statement is still possible but deprecated. Instead, the 
statement "Subdir = ..." should be used which is taken relative to 
the "Logbook dir". If no "Subdir" is given, the logbook name itself is used 
as the subdir. For this demo logbook I use now:

[global]
...
Resource dir = /usr/local/elogdemo
Logbook dir = /usr/local/elogdemo/logbooks

and no "Data dir" statements any more. The logbooks "Linux", "Database" 
and "Forum" are then located at

/usr/local/elogdemo/logbooks/Linux
/usr/local/elogdemo/logbooks/Database
/usr/local/elogdemo/logbooks/Forum

respectively. The help, theme and icon files are located at their old 
position ("themes" is automatically added to the "resource dir" as it was 
before).
  190   Tue Jan 7 17:49:40 2003 Idea Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.ch   "User" and "Group" statements changed from Version 2.2.5
From Version 2.2.5 on, the configuration file entries

User = ...
Group = ...

have been changed to

Usr = ...
Grp = ...

in order not to conflict with the new "Group = ..." option which is used by 
hierarchical logbooks.
  223   Tue Feb 18 08:07:10 2003 Idea Nicknikc@cnic.com   New Version
I noticed the site has been updated as far as the documentation for 2.3.1, 
however the latest version in the downloads section is 2.3.0, any other 
places where I can get 2.3.1

Cheers
  224   Tue Feb 18 09:21:34 2003 Idea Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.ch   Re: New Version
> I noticed the site has been updated as far as the documentation for 2.3.1, 
> however the latest version in the downloads section is 2.3.0, any other 
> places where I can get 2.3.1
> 
> Cheers

Patience, patience! 2.3.1 is currently kind of in "beta" version, but will be 
released this week. Not that you can always get the latest snapshot from the 
CVS tree at

http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/src/elogd.c

- Stefan
  226   Wed Feb 19 09:26:04 2003 Question Tomas Rudolftomas@mba.be   Participation on development of ELOG
Stefan, 
We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful 
application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your 
source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.

I was wondering if there is a way we could coordinate the development 
together. For instance, would it be of your interest to receive the code 
adaptations we do and implement it in your future releases? 

To be more specific, for the moment we are really interested in 
implementing the SHELL script execution on the server (I noticed it is in 
your wishlist).

Best regards,

Tomas Rudolf
Micro Belgium Application
  227   Wed Feb 19 09:37:30 2003 Smile Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.ch   Re: Participation on development of ELOG
> We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful 
> application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your 
> source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.
> 
> I was wondering if there is a way we could coordinate the development 
> together. For instance, would it be of your interest to receive the code 
> adaptations we do and implement it in your future releases? 

Sure, I'm very interested in those and ready to merge it into the main 
development tree.

- Stefan
  229   Wed Feb 19 09:54:38 2003 Agree Tomas Rudolftomas@mba.be   Re: Participation on development of ELOG
> > We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful 
> > application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your 
> > source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.
> > 
> > I was wondering if there is a way we could coordinate the development 
> > together. For instance, would it be of your interest to receive the code 
> > adaptations we do and implement it in your future releases? 
> 
> Sure, I'm very interested in those and ready to merge it into the main 
> development tree.
> 
> - Stefan

Thanx for your quick answer.
I'll keep you updated as we move ahead with the development.
Tomas
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6