| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
2005
|
Tue Oct 17 14:47:53 2006 |
 | Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size | Thanks Stefan,
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | | Did you try the new version, would be interesting to see if it's any better... |
I didn't find the time to try it yet but I will do that later today. I will keep you posted - more soon.
Cheers,
Dimitris |
|
2015
|
Mon Oct 23 12:53:08 2006 |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size | Hi Stefan,
A lot of performance-related trouble for us comes from the ability of users to click on "All" and display thousands of entries on the same page. Is there a way to disable that? Even if the ELCode parsing performance of Elog increases greatly, the combination of "Full" mode and "All" will still cause trouble, will it not?
Thanks,
Dimitris |
|
2016
|
Tue Oct 24 21:58:54 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote: | Hi Stefan,
A lot of performance-related trouble for us comes from the ability of users to click on "All" and display thousands of entries on the same page. Is there a way to disable that? Even if the ELCode parsing performance of Elog increases greatly, the combination of "Full" mode and "All" will still cause trouble, will it not?
Thanks,
Dimitris |
What about a threshold for the "All" display? If a logbook contains less than, let's say, 500 entries, the "All" link is displayed, and above 500 entries it's hidden. Would that make sense? |
|
2018
|
Wed Oct 25 18:00:24 2006 |
 | Alexandre Lindote | alex@lipc.fis.uc.pt | Question | Linux | | ELCode | Hi,
can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up?
I can use it here, on the forum, and on the DEMO logbook, but not on the ones I created...
Oh, and me inserting "Allowed encoding = " whatever in the config file doesn't seem to mater as well... I always get the 3 options!
Am I missing a flag somewhere?
The config file for this logbook is below...
Thanks a lot
Alex
Theme = default
Page Title = ZEPLIN-III Idiot's Guide
Comment = ZEPLIN-III Idiot's Guide - test phase
Subdir = idiots_guide
Time format = %A, %B %d, %Y, %H:%M
Date format = %A, %B %d, %Y
Menu commands = List, New, Edit, Delete, Download, Find, Last day, Config, Admin, Login, Logout, Help
Display mode = summary
Preset Author = $long_name
Attributes = Author, Type, Subject
Options Type = Software, Hardware
Required Attributes = Author, Type, Subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Type, Subject
List Display = Edit, Type, Subject, Author, Date
;define zeplin3 as a user who can enter and read entries, but not modify
;or create new entries
;Deny New = zeplin3
;Deny Edit = zeplin3
;Deny Reply = zeplin3
;Deny Delete = zeplin3
Deny Config = zeplin3
;Deny CSV Import = zeplin3
;define that only the administrator will see the Admin link
Allow Admin = alex
;Remove email notification for now. There's no SMTP server working...
Suppress default = 3
Suppress Email on edit = 3
;show or hide the mode menu
Mode commands = 0
;With this option, an entry being edited by another user becomes red
;Use Lock = 1
;allow only html and text entries for now
Allowed encoding = 3
Default encoding = 1 |
|
2019
|
Wed Oct 25 19:44:11 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: ELCode |
| Alexandre Lindote wrote: | | can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up? |
There is a good reason why this forum contains a ELOG Version tag which you are supposed to fill out for new entries. Without knowing which version you are using I cannot help you. Probably you have an old version which does not support the Allowed encoding. |
|
2031
|
Thu Nov 2 10:14:11 2006 |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | | What about a threshold for the "All" display? If a logbook contains less than, let's say, 500 entries, the "All" link is displayed, and above 500 entries it's hidden. Would that make sense? |
Hi Stefan,
Sorry for the late response, I was away for a few days. Yes, I think that this would make perfect sense, especially if the maximum number of entries was configurable.
Cheers,
Dimitris |
|
2041
|
Mon Nov 6 17:13:19 2006 |
 | David Egolf | degolf@fujicolor.com | Question | | | Spell check | Sorry if this has been asked.
Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
Thanks,
David Egolf |
|
2042
|
Mon Nov 6 17:18:04 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Spell check |
| David Egolf wrote: | Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
|
I personally use Mozilla Firefox 2.0 which has already a built in spell checker. For MS IE, you can use IESpell (http://www.iespell.com). |
|