Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Tue Oct 17 14:47:53 2006
|
Thanks Stefan,
[quote="Stefan Ritt"] Did you try the new version, would be interesting to see if it's any better... [/quote]
|
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Mon Oct 23 12:53:08 2006
|
Hi Stefan,
A lot of performance-related trouble for us comes from the ability of users to click on "All" and display thousands of entries on the same page. Is there |
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Oct 24 21:58:54 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]Hi Stefan,
A lot of performance-related trouble for us comes from the ability of users to click on "All" and display thousands of entries on the same page. Is there |
ELCode, posted by Alexandre Lindote on Wed Oct 25 18:00:24 2006
|
Hi,
can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up?
|
Re: ELCode, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Oct 25 19:44:11 2006
|
[quote="Alexandre Lindote"]can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up?[/quote]
There is a good reason why this forum contains a [B]ELOG Version[/B] tag which you are supposed to fill out for new entries. Without knowing which version |
Re: Problem with large entry size, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Thu Nov 2 10:14:11 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]What about a threshold for the "All" display? If a logbook contains less than, let's say, 500 entries, the "All" link is displayed,
and above 500 entries it's hidden. Would that make sense?[/quote]
|
Spell check, posted by David Egolf on Mon Nov 6 17:13:19 2006
|
Sorry if this has been asked.
Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
|
Re: Spell check, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 6 17:18:04 2006
|
[quote="David Egolf"]Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
[/quote]
|