Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 786 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  117   Fri Aug 16 12:52:53 2002 Question eric wootenwootene@verizon.netRequest  Author & pwd case sensitive ?
Is it possible to make the author and pwd check case in-sensitive??  I 
noticed that unless you type your userid and password in the same case each 
time, the system doesn't recognize your or thinks the info is invalid.

thanks,
eric
  67306   Wed Aug 8 21:23:59 2012 Question cowdenchristopher.cowden@ttu.eduQuestionLinux2.9.0-2411Authentication problem with wget and links (text browser)

Hello,

I'm not able to authenticate to a logbook using my text based browser links, so I've started investigating with wget hoping solving the problem one will lead to a solution for the other.  I've seen some examples on how to use wget to parse logbook entries in this forum, but my attempts keep returning the login page.  Any advice would be helpful and appreciated.  Here are a couple of the command line arguments I've tried:

wget --save-cookies cookie.txt --keep-session-cookies -d "http://hostname/LOGBOOK?unamee=YYY&upassword=XXX" -O elog.txt

wget --save-cookies cookie.txt --keep-session-cookies -d --post-data="redit=&uname=YYY&upassword=XXX&remember=1" -e robots=off "http://hostname/LOGBOOK" -O elog.txt

After these executions, my cookies.txt file remains empty.  Running subsequent command with "--load-cookies=cookies.txt" still points me to the login page.

Many Thanks,

Chris 

 

  67026   Tue Mar 15 17:37:19 2011 Blink soren poulsensoren.poulsen@cern.chCommentLinux2.9.0-2402Authentication error message

It is very good to have Kerberos authentication available. It is just the error message which is a bit cryptic.

If you enter your Kerberos password once, and later fail to authenticate with a wrong password, you get:

Kerberos error:
Decrypt integrity check failed.
Please check your Kerberos configuration

 

That is not really urgent!


Soren

 

  65697   Fri Jan 18 13:57:31 2008 Question Javier A. Ortizjavier.ortiz.78@gmail.comQuestionWindows Audit Trail?

First thanks for the great software! My only question would be how to implement audit trail feature. I know you can control who edits and that's great but in regulated environments like mine there's a requirement that the original record, the one edited, is not deleted or overwritten. If not possible right now the only thing I could think of is a mechanism, maybe possible thru configuration, that when the record is edited it is copied to an audit trail logbook (i.e. if logbook name is 'test' it's audit logbook will be named 'test-audit' which is read only) and have a link to the audit trail of the record (show only changes of the current record).

 

I'm more than aware that it's possible thru configuration but I'm short on that dept. Any help/idea?

 

Thanks in advance!

  67034   Thu Mar 24 17:23:37 2011 Cool Ryanryan.hoitt@gmail.comQuestionWindowsELOG V2.7Attributes for message workflow.

I am attempting to setup an ECR (Engineering Change Review/Request) process in ELOG.

I have a logbook setup so that an original request is submitted with a status of "Approval Pending"

Options ECR Status = Approval Pending, Approved / In Progress, Completed / In QA, Closed

Once the entry is made, it is reviewed by several people who reply to the original entry and update the approval fields, adding any comments as a reply :

Options OPS Approval = Approved, Denied
Options ENG Approval = Approved, Denied
Options Director Approval = Approved, Denied

Once the final approval is obtained, they reply to the thread and update the ECR Status field to "Approved / In Progress"

This goes through our QA process, and is finaly updated with "Closed"

 

The problem is, I would like to keep the historical data of when the status of these entries are made. For example, in the message thread, I can see that reply #4 changed the "Status" field to "Approved". However, I can not seem to find a way for this to work with quick filtering. The quick filter always filters on the first entry on a thread, and not the last.

The other option would be to change the status of the first entry, but that seems silly as I am using replys instead of edits.

Any ideas on how to implement this "Status" field into my workflow? I am even open to losing the historical "status" and beeing able to change all entries on the thread on reply. (i.e. Reply #4 changes "Status" to "Approved", and the system changed all entries in the thread to "Approved")

  2082   Sat Nov 18 11:19:14 2006 Entry ather khanather.khan@cpjeddah.comQuestion  Attributes according to users
Hi,
Is it possible to have certain attributtes available to certain user in one log boolk.
We have log book where the supervisor assign jobs to employees and we want only supervisor to have assign to attributes available and others only to view it.

thanks,
Ather
  66106   Thu Dec 11 03:13:31 2008 Warning Dennis Seitzdseitz@berkeley.eduBug reportMac OSX2.7.5Attribute value lost when adding to another extendable attribute

Here is an excerpt from my config file:

Type Last Edit = datetime
Preset Last Edit =$entry time
Locked Attributes = Last Edit
Subst on edit Last Edit = $date
Preset on Duplicate Last Edit = $date

I have another attribute called Part that I've made extendable.

When I duplicate an entry, Last Edit is updated with the current date correctly. However, as soon as I click the Add Part button next to my extendable Part attribute, and the page reloads to show the entry box for the Part field, the Last Entry field is replaced with a "-".

I have to submit and then re-edit the entry to get Last Edit to have a valid value again.

 

 *EDIT*:

I noticed that any time the page reloads while in the entry screen this happens, e.g. by selecting plain instead of html format.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1599   Wed Jan 18 02:22:44 2006 Question Adam BlandfordAdam.Blandford@dsto.defence.gov.auBug report 2.6.0Attribute substitution in email configuration
In the logbook config file I am not able to use attribute substitution in the <string> tag for
Use Email Heading = <string>
Attribute substitution does work however for
Use Email Subject = <string>
e.g.
Use Email Subject = ELOG $logbook entry; $Category: $Subject
will result in an email subject of: "ELOG Forum entry; Bug Report; Attribute substitution in email configuration"
Use Email Heading = A new entry has been submitted by $long_name on $remote_host on $date
will result in an email heading of: "A new entry has been submitted by $long_name on $remote_host on $date"

Not sure if this functionality is intended or is a bug. An comment/feedback/suggestion would be appreciated.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6