ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1144
|
Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.9 | Re: Version of GCC to use? | > Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9). Is there a reason why these includes are not
> placed in the src dir like the regex.h/.c include?
Yes. I use these files in several other projects as well, and want to maintain only a
single copy. So I have
elogd-x.x.x/
elogd-x.x.x/src/
....
mxml/
mxml/strlcpy.h
mxml/strlcpy.c
mxml/mxml.c
mxml/mxml.c
...
other-project-x.x.x/
other-project-x.x.x/
So both elogd and "other-project" can use strlcpy.c and mxml.c. If I would copy it to
elogd-x.x.x/src and fix a bug there, "other-project" would use a separate copy and not
profit from the bug fix. So I would have to mainain verious copies of the same file, which
make things complicated. I compile everything also under windows, so I cannot use soft
links. If there is a better way of how to do it, please let me know. |
1146
|
Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.9 | Re: Version of GCC to use? | > [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/adminguide.html
> ...
> mxml/
> mxml/mxml.c
> mxml/strlcpy.c
> mxml/mxml.h
> mxml/strlcpy.h
> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ cd elog-2.5.9
> [ritt@pc5082 elog-2.5.9]$ make
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -o elog src/elog.c
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o regex.o src/regex.c
> ... skipping warnings ...
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o mxml.o ../mxml/mxml.c
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o strlcpy.o ../mxml/strlcpy.c
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -I../mxml -o elogd src/elogd.c regex.o
> mxml.o strlcpy.o
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -o elconv src/elconv.c
> [ritt@pc5082 elog-2.5.9]$
>
> --------------
> No undefined functions here. I guess you have an old Makefile? Just use the complete tar
> package from the last version.
Ok, now I have it. Old Makefile because I had to perform some deletions to make "make" work
right under Solaris. Basically, I took out the ifdef structures - "make" was blowing up on
these. Everything now compiles perfectly -- don't change anything. Thanks for that last pointer.
Steve |
1164
|
Tue May 31 09:07:37 2005 |
| Alex H | alex@synergie-inf.com | Request | Windows | 2.5.8-6 | Re: password encryption | Thanks Stefan 8) |
1220
|
Mon Jun 27 15:37:25 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug fix | Linux | 2.6.0beta2 | Re: [BUG] quick filter |
Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Fixed in current CVS.
|
uhm... now the drop down menu is composed of only blancs ..
|
the following patch should solve the problem 
--- src/elogd.c 24 Jun 2005 20:22:33 -0000 1.685
+++ src/elogd.c 27 Jun 2005 13:34:05 -0000
@@ -15853,7 +15853,7 @@
if (comment[0] == 0)
strcpy(comment, attr_options[i][j]);
- for (i1=i2=0 ; i1<=(int)comment ; i1++) {
+ for (i1=i2=0 ; i1<=(int)strlen(comment) ; i1++) {
if (comment[i1] == '(') {
option[i2++] = '\\';
option[i2++] = '(';
|
1233
|
Thu Jul 7 04:49:19 2005 |
| Gary Clayson | imppster@gmail.com | Info | Windows | latest | Re: A comprehensive listing of all commands elog performs |
Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: |
Gary Clayson wrote: | Can someone please enter a comprehensive list of the commands eLog will honor. I'm trying to build a 'decent' start page and am not totally familiar with eLog just yet. Thanks Stefan for an awesome application. The documentation is really decent, too. I just have been unable to locate a list of all commands available.
Thanks in advance.
Gary ;-> |
there's a link in the main elog web page.. it's under the Admin guide and it is the elog.cfg syntax guide |
thanks for the advice. DuH on me, I just needed to read the syntax page a little more closely. |
1246
|
Fri Jul 8 22:20:19 2005 |
| Gary Clayson | imppster@gmail.com | Request | Windows | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Suppress Email notification checkbox |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Gary Clayson wrote: | Hello All. Stefan, would it be possible to add one more option to the Suppress Default flag? I'd appreciate a setting that would suppress emails being sent and remove the option from the page. Or, has this been accomplished? And, if so, what is that setting. Thanks in advance!! Keep up the great work. |
I added
Suppress default = 3
which always suppresses email notifications. The addition is under CVS and will be included in the next release.
- Stefan |
Thanks Stefan. |
1361
|
Mon Aug 1 06:14:41 2005 |
| Dinesh Bapat | dinesh.bapat@gmail.com | Question | | | Re: Summary page |
Thank you very much.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dinesh Bapat wrote: | But "Summary" page of my e-log continues to display additional column "Text". Kindly advise how to hide this last column. |
Summary lines = 0
Dinesh Bapat wrote: | Also, is it possible to assign % width for each of these columns (ID, Author, Type, When, Subject) |
Yes, via the Cascading Style Sheets, but only for the single display page. First put a
Format Author = 0, author_name, author_value
then put into your default.css following sections:
.author_name {
width:10%;
text-align:right;
font-size:14pt;
background-color:#AAAAFF;
border:1px solid #0000FF;
border-top:1px solid white;
border-left:1px solid white;
padding:3px;
}
.author_value {
width:10%;
font-size:14pt;
border:1px solid #308000;
border-top:1px solid white;
border-left:1px solid white;
background-color:#BBCCBB;
padding:3px;
}
Here you can then play with the width, font-size etc. I use this for example for the large subject dispaly in this forum.
On the list display however, the column width is determined by the browser, which tries to optimally arrange the colums for best readability. |
|
1387
|
Fri Aug 5 14:30:52 2005 |
| Kees Bol | kees.bol@wur.nl | Info | Linux | 2.6.0 | Re: "full" only changes color |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Kees Bol wrote: | Stefan, I installed V2.6.0-beta3 and there is a (unwanted) difference. The Text field now appears in the summary-view despite the config specifies:
List Display = ID, Logdate, Author, Book, Chapter, Type, Subject
so in my opinion the text-field should not show up here. |
If you do not want text display in the summary view, add
Summary lines = 0
into your config file.
Kees Bol wrote: | Another point: there was some discussion about v2.6.0-beta3 being slow.
I have v2.6.0-beta and v2.6.0-beta3 running side by side on the same server and notice also a big difference in speed, beta3 being much slower. |
This is still a mystery to me, since on all machines I try the speed is fine. I'm still waiting for some debugging analysis from users which have this problem. If I cannot reproduce it, I cannot fix it. |
After upgrading to v2.6.0-beta4 everything works fine now.
Thanks for your help |
|