| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
2018
|
Wed Oct 25 18:00:24 2006 |
 | Alexandre Lindote | alex@lipc.fis.uc.pt | Question | Linux | | ELCode | Hi,
can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up?
I can use it here, on the forum, and on the DEMO logbook, but not on the ones I created...
Oh, and me inserting "Allowed encoding = " whatever in the config file doesn't seem to mater as well... I always get the 3 options!
Am I missing a flag somewhere?
The config file for this logbook is below...
Thanks a lot
Alex
Theme = default
Page Title = ZEPLIN-III Idiot's Guide
Comment = ZEPLIN-III Idiot's Guide - test phase
Subdir = idiots_guide
Time format = %A, %B %d, %Y, %H:%M
Date format = %A, %B %d, %Y
Menu commands = List, New, Edit, Delete, Download, Find, Last day, Config, Admin, Login, Logout, Help
Display mode = summary
Preset Author = $long_name
Attributes = Author, Type, Subject
Options Type = Software, Hardware
Required Attributes = Author, Type, Subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Type, Subject
List Display = Edit, Type, Subject, Author, Date
;define zeplin3 as a user who can enter and read entries, but not modify
;or create new entries
;Deny New = zeplin3
;Deny Edit = zeplin3
;Deny Reply = zeplin3
;Deny Delete = zeplin3
Deny Config = zeplin3
;Deny CSV Import = zeplin3
;define that only the administrator will see the Admin link
Allow Admin = alex
;Remove email notification for now. There's no SMTP server working...
Suppress default = 3
Suppress Email on edit = 3
;show or hide the mode menu
Mode commands = 0
;With this option, an entry being edited by another user becomes red
;Use Lock = 1
;allow only html and text entries for now
Allowed encoding = 3
Default encoding = 1 |
|
2019
|
Wed Oct 25 19:44:11 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: ELCode |
| Alexandre Lindote wrote: | | can you think of any obvious reason why the ELCode would not work in the logbooks I set up? |
There is a good reason why this forum contains a ELOG Version tag which you are supposed to fill out for new entries. Without knowing which version you are using I cannot help you. Probably you have an old version which does not support the Allowed encoding. |
|
2031
|
Thu Nov 2 10:14:11 2006 |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | | What about a threshold for the "All" display? If a logbook contains less than, let's say, 500 entries, the "All" link is displayed, and above 500 entries it's hidden. Would that make sense? |
Hi Stefan,
Sorry for the late response, I was away for a few days. Yes, I think that this would make perfect sense, especially if the maximum number of entries was configurable.
Cheers,
Dimitris |
|
2041
|
Mon Nov 6 17:13:19 2006 |
 | David Egolf | degolf@fujicolor.com | Question | | | Spell check | Sorry if this has been asked.
Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
Thanks,
David Egolf |
|
2042
|
Mon Nov 6 17:18:04 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Spell check |
| David Egolf wrote: | Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
|
I personally use Mozilla Firefox 2.0 which has already a built in spell checker. For MS IE, you can use IESpell (http://www.iespell.com). |
|
2043
|
Mon Nov 6 17:36:35 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | | | Re: Spell check |
| David Egolf wrote: | Sorry if this has been asked.
Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
Thanks,
David Egolf |
I find that the Google spell checker works very well in IE6. |
|
2058
|
Thu Nov 9 21:22:27 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Problem with large entry size |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | | What about a threshold for the "All" display? If a logbook contains less than, let's say, 500 entries, the "All" link is displayed, and above 500 entries it's hidden. Would that make sense? |
Hi Stefan,
Sorry for the late response, I was away for a few days. Yes, I think that this would make perfect sense, especially if the maximum number of entries was configurable.
Cheers,
Dimitris |
Agree. So I implemented the new config option All display limit. The default is 500. So you can see that at this forum, the All link is not shown any more, since the logbook contains more than 500 entries. The promised performance improvement of the page display will take me some more time, but I will not forget it. |
|
2082
|
Sat Nov 18 11:19:14 2006 |
 | ather khan | ather.khan@cpjeddah.com | Question | | | Attributes according to users | Hi,
Is it possible to have certain attributtes available to certain user in one log boolk.
We have log book where the supervisor assign jobs to employees and we want only supervisor to have assign to attributes available and others only to view it.
thanks,
Ather |
|