| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
534
|
Wed May 5 17:38:12 2004 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | Linux | 2.5.2 | Re: safari browser issue |
> we've experienced a problem when using the safari browser to do a search in
> our elog. whenever you do a search, the logbook returns an error and the
> elog deamon crashes. when we first experienced this problem we were running
> version 2.3.9. however, an upgrade to version 2.5.2 doesn't seem to fix the
> problem. searches with other browsers (mozilla, internet explorer, ...) go
> off without a hitch.
> has anyone else observed a similar problem or have any ideas on how to
> resolve this issue.
> thanks for the help.
I finally found some time to address this problem. It was related to the way I
do the page redirection. The "Location:" in the HTTP header used a relative
path, although the standard requires an absolute (full) path, which I just
discovered. Although most browsers accept a relative path, the safari browser
obviously does not.
I changed the redirection to absolute paths, the new version can be obtained
via CVS. |
|
543
|
Thu May 20 00:55:51 2004 |
 | Ralph Kuehn | r.e.kuehn@larc.nasa.gov | | Windows | 2.5.2 | User/Admin privlege question |
Hello,
For some reason if I define a "login user" that is allowed the configure
option he is also allowed to change the configuration file. According to the
documentation it seems like this should NOT be the case. Any ideas as to
what the problem might be?
Thanks in advance for any help/advice.
Ralph |
| Attachment 1: elogd.cfg_cpy
|
[global]
logbook tabs = 0
port = 8080
Password file = C:\Program Files\Elog\passwd
Admin user = skuehn
Self Register = 3
Logout to main = 1
Logfile = C:\Program Files\Elog\logfile
Logging level = 3
[thelog]
Comment = The Logbook for Daily Entries
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Login expiration = 1000
Login user = skuehn,kuehn
; Look and Feel
CSS = compact.css
Display mode = summary
Theme = default
; Attributes
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Required Attributes = Author, Type
ROptions Type = Routine, Supplemental, Special, Other
ROptions Category = General, Other
Thread display = $subject, posted by $author on $entry time
; Preset author and email
Preset Author = $long_name
Preset Author Email = $user_email
Preset Type = Routine
Preset Category = General
; These Attributes Cannot be changed
Locked Attributes = Author
; Flags
Reverse sort = 1
Back to main = 0
Quick filter = Date, Type
; Options for Reply
Subst on reply subject = Re: $subject
Remove on reply = Author, Author Email
; Email settings
Use Email Subject = $subject
Use Email From = $user_email
; Email notification, 0=send
Suppress Email to users = 0
|
|
544
|
Fri May 21 14:43:09 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: User/Admin privlege question |
> For some reason if I define a "login user" that is allowed the configure
> option he is also allowed to change the configuration file. According to the
> documentation it seems like this should NOT be the case. Any ideas as to
> what the problem might be?
Unfortunately I cannot reproduce your problem. This leaves few possibilites:
- any login user CAN change his/her full name, email address etc. but only admin
users can change ALL OTHERS as well. Admin users should see a "change elogd.cfg"
button on the config page, whil normal users will not
- are you sure you logged out as admin user and loggin in again as non-admin
user? Under some circumstances, the browser keeps old cookies which can confuse
things. Best is if you delete all browser cookies and try again (Tools/Internet
Options/Delete Cookies in IE).
- Stefan |
|
557
|
Fri Jun 4 22:40:44 2004 |
 | Robin Peterson | robin.h.peterson@state.or.us | | | 2.52 | Using select menu option to move multiple logbook entries to another logbook |
I'm trying to configure this thing to be able to filter on a set of
criteria, choose select, choose toggle all, and then choose "Move to
Complete Work Requests".
I've been able to select a specific logbook entry and move it, and I've
been able to filter and select and toggle, but I can't figure out how to
get the Move To option to show up on the main logbook menu....
what am I missing?
robin |
|
558
|
Mon Jun 7 15:58:10 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | | 2.52 | Re: Using select menu option to move multiple logbook entries to another logbook |
> I've been able to select a specific logbook entry and move it, and I've
> been able to filter and select and toggle, but I can't figure out how to
> get the Move To option to show up on the main logbook menu....
To be able to move entries between logbooks, you have to enable the "move to"
command with the option "Menu commands" like:
Menu commands = Back, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Find, Config, Move to, Help
Having done this, the menu "Move to xxx" should show up when you select an
individual entry, where xxx is the name of the other logbook(s). If you so a
"Select" on several entries, a new button should show up which lets you move
all selected entries to the other logbook(s). See elog:/1 for an example. If
you do not observer this behaviour, please let me know. |
| Attachment 1: move_to.gif
|
|
|
612
|
Fri Jul 16 06:20:40 2004 |
 | Geo Geo | gorilla_geo@yahoo.com | | Windows | 2.53. | Fixed Attribute Reply |
Hi Stefan
YOu have been a great help on the Elog problem solving .
I have another sort of bug , when i have a attribute type as date.
And i have fixed the attribute on reply , i actually get a string of
number when i reply , and the date becomes not the orginal date in the
first message.
So the way i work ard is that i did not place the date field in the fixed
attribute reply which i will run the risk of pple modifying that entry .
Can this be fix?
Thanks |
|
625
|
Wed Jul 28 21:25:52 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | | Windows | 2.53. | Re: Fixed Attribute Reply |
> Hi Stefan
> YOu have been a great help on the Elog problem solving .
> I have another sort of bug , when i have a attribute type as date.
> And i have fixed the attribute on reply , i actually get a string of
> number when i reply , and the date becomes not the orginal date in the
> first message.
>
> So the way i work ard is that i did not place the date field in the fixed
> attribute reply which i will run the risk of pple modifying that entry .
> Can this be fix?
Yes, I fixed this. Revision 1.412 under CVS, new snapshot for Windows at the
download page. |
|
637
|
Fri Jul 30 02:03:59 2004 |
 | Guenter Nowak | Guenter.Nowqak@t-systems.at | | | | ?cmd=New&pType=PC does not work |
according to the users guide,
http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Database/?cmd=New&pType=PC
should create an entry with the type value set to PC, but this doesn't work |