Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 790 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OSdown ELOG Version Subject
  1620   Mon Jan 23 17:32:20 2006 Reply mark jamesmark@majames.comQuestion 2.6.0b5Re: Quicklink does not work for one field

Stefan Ritt wrote:

mark james wrote:
I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.


Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release.


Thanks for that. I am now using ver V2.6.1-1622. So I guess that doesn't qualify as a "next release". I wonder if there is anything I could do to work around the issue?

Mark
  1621   Mon Jan 23 18:35:52 2006 Reply mark jamesmark@majames.comQuestion 2.6.0b5Re: Quicklink does not work for one field

mark james wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

mark james wrote:
I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.


Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release.


Thanks for that. I am now using ver V2.6.1-1622. So I guess that doesn't qualify as a "next release". I wonder if there is anything I could do to work around the issue?

Mark

In fact now the dropdown seems to be working but when I 'tick' an entry, it is not being written to the ascii file.
  1622   Tue Jan 24 08:11:13 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestion 2.6.0b5Re: Quicklink does not work for one field

mark james wrote:

mark james wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

mark james wrote:
I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.


Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release.


Thanks for that. I am now using ver V2.6.1-1622. So I guess that doesn't qualify as a "next release". I wonder if there is anything I could do to work around the issue?

Mark

In fact now the dropdown seems to be working but when I 'tick' an entry, it is not being written to the ascii file.


Can you try V2.6.1-1634? I fixed several issues with ticking entries coming from "MOptions" lists.
  1626   Wed Jan 25 01:08:06 2006 Reply Giorgio Croci Candianig.crocic@libero.itBug report 2.6.1Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1
> > I just installed v.2.6.1 coming from the previous 2.6.0 (on Win2000)
> > When I access the "configuration" function from a logbook, in the cfg page I only see two buttons in the header
> > (save or cancel); in the previous version I saw more buttons there ("global config", "create new logbook" and so
> > on), so here I'm unable to access global configuration or logbook management (except for current logbook options).
> 
> I tried to reproduce your problem, but could not. In my windows installation it looks fine. You only see the
> (save and cancel) buttons only if you go to "Change [global]", otherwise you see the "Change [global]", "Delete
> this logbook" etc. buttons. Have you tried with the default elogd.cfg which comes from the distribution?

Here I am again... I built and installed v2.6.1 also on a different system, this time on linux; i tried both with the
existing cfg file and with the new cfg.
Choosing "configuration", I still only see the current logbook configuration file section with "Save" and "cancel"
buttons, no access to global config whatsoever; the same as I saw on windows version. I tried version 2.6.1-1622.
Regards
Giorgio
  1627   Wed Jan 25 08:24:28 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug report 2.6.1Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1
> Here I am again... I built and installed v2.6.1 also on a different system, this time on linux; i tried both
with the
> existing cfg file and with the new cfg.
> Choosing "configuration", I still only see the current logbook configuration file section with "Save" and "cancel"
> buttons, no access to global config whatsoever; the same as I saw on windows version. I tried version 2.6.1-1622.

I tried again, using the configuration file from the distribution (elog:1627/1). Hitting "config", I see the picture
attached (elog:1627/2). So it's a mystery why it is different in your case...
Attachment 1: elogd.cfg
[global]
port = 8080

[demo]
Theme = default
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Options Type = Routine, Software Installation, Problem Fixed, Configuration, Other
Options Category = General, Hardware, Software, Network, Other
Extendable Options = Category
Required Attributes = Author, Type
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date, Type

Attachment 2: Capture.gif
Capture.gif
  1628   Wed Jan 25 12:08:13 2006 Reply Giorgio Croci Candianig.crocic@libero.itBug report 2.6.1Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1
> I tried again, using the configuration file from the distribution (elog:1627/1). Hitting "config", I see the picture
> attached (elog:1627/2). So it's a mystery why it is different in your case...

Indeed... I peeked into the code, and I got the feeling it could be a matter of incorrect user setup (though I have no
users/authorizations defined at all) or maybe browser cookies. A thin trail, but I'll try some debug directly on the
code and, should I come up with something, I'll surely notice you.
Thanks for your support!
  1629   Wed Jan 25 12:10:46 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug report 2.6.1Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1
> or maybe browser cookies. 

That rings a bell. If you change user permissions (like password file/no password file/rename logbooks) you might be
fooled by old cookies. Just delete all cookies in your browser and try again.
  1634   Fri Jan 27 13:50:10 2006 Reply mark jamesmark@majames.comQuestion 2.6.0b5Re: Quicklink does not work for one field

Stefan Ritt wrote:

mark james wrote:

mark james wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

mark james wrote:
I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.


Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release.


Thanks for that. I am now using ver V2.6.1-1622. So I guess that doesn't qualify as a "next release". I wonder if there is anything I could do to work around the issue?

Mark

In fact now the dropdown seems to be working but when I 'tick' an entry, it is not being written to the ascii file.


Can you try V2.6.1-1634? I fixed several issues with ticking entries coming from "MOptions" lists.


OK. But where do I get this from? The "latest version of 19 Jan is still 1622.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6