ELOG Forum

Demo Discussion

Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities

Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 793 of 801

Not logged in

Find | Login | Help

Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments

6404 Entries

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 792, 793, 794 ... 799, 800, 801 Next

Tue Oct 9 11:48:17 2007

Fergus Lynch

flynch@alternativenetworks.com

Request

ELOG V2.6.

Re: Add date and time stamp to file upload

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Fergus Lynch wrote:

I would like to request a new feature - add date and time stamp to file upload. We use ELOG (amongst other things!) as a change log and this would really allow allow more accurate records to be kept. For instance we upload router config files (to record changes)and having the exact upload date would be a big enhancement, especially when there are a lot of attachments.

There is already a time and a date stamp. If you look in the logbook directory, you see attachments preceded with the date and time when they were submitted. You can see this date/time when you click on the attachment, such as in

http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Config+Examples/040519_000348/elogd.cfg

where you will see it even in the URL (May 19th, 2004, 0:03:48) in the above case. I agree that this is not so obvious. If you make a proposal where this date/time should be displayed, I can easily add it.

Hi, I think this would be great new functionality, so I would propose the date/time stamp for an uploaded file was placed just after the file size text that appears at the far right hand side of all attachments.

Many Thanks
Fergus

65621

Fri Oct 19 21:44:00 2007

Re: Add date and time stamp to file upload

Fergus Lynch wrote:

I implemented this as you can see at elog:Linux+Demo/14 . The new feature will be contained in the next release, and will also work for entries made before this feature was implemented.

65660

Wed Nov 28 23:35:36 2007

> > > Greetings,
> > > 
> > > Last night we updated to 2.6.5 and now the <ENTER>-key on the "quick filter" searches won't work anymore in 
> > > internet exporer (@windows). I have to use the <TAB>-key now to get the results.
> > > 
> > > The ENTER-key still works under firefox (Windows & linux) and opera (at least under linux, because 
> > > opera@windows refuses to log me on .. whatever) and I would like to see it come back to internet explorer as 
> > > well.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Willem Koster
> > 
> > ehm... funny enough the quick-filter entry used in this elog does work with IE.  
> > 
> > (we're using ELOG V2.6.5-1844 btw)
> > 
> > update: when we try just one quick-filter it works ok, when we add our second quick-filter it stops working.
> > 
> > Both quick-filters are tekst-searches (just like this forum only has one tekst-search quick-filter).
> > 
> > We suspect that this is an explorer issue and probably not something that can be solved with elog, but ... 
> > maybe .. who knows...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > update2:
> > 
> > In the source we see:
> > 
> >     <noscript><input type="Submit" value="Search"></noscript> 
> > 
> > If we remove the <noscript> </noscript> tags we get a submit-button, but our problem seems to be solved. 
> > (obviously hacking the source-code is not our primary choice :-)
> 
> The code above is for cases where JavaScript is not enabled. The quick filter text box contains code like:
> 
>   onChange="document.form1.submit()"
> 
> which is some javacode which causes the browser to submit the form after the contents of the text box has changed.
> Now if javascript is turned off, this does not work obviously. So I added the <noscript> section which shows the
> Submit button, so people can click on it. But you are telling me that IE accepts the hit on return (not the click
> on the Submit button) even when JavaScript is off, right? Can you temporarily remove the onChange section and see
> what happens?


Hello,

I installed the latest version (2.7) of ELOG and having the problem that the quick filter only works when hitting the 
enter-key when there is only one free text field (subtext). Whene having two or more free text field you have to use 
the tab-key or click onto the elog icon. We are using Internet Explorer, not tested on Mozilla right now.

Thanks!

Uwe

65661

Thu Nov 29 12:22:44 2007

> I installed the latest version (2.7) of ELOG and having the problem that the quick filter only works when hitting the 
> enter-key when there is only one free text field (subtext). Whene having two or more free text field you have to use 
> the tab-key or click onto the elog icon. We are using Internet Explorer, not tested on Mozilla right now.

I found that this is indeed an Internet Explorer bug, since it works with all other browsers I tested. There is however a
workaround: I added some code to the current version of elog which shows a "Search" button whenever the page is accessed
through the Internet Explorer. Then the behavior of hitting <return> works again. The change is in revision #1970 and will
be contained in the next release.

65664

Thu Nov 29 18:59:59 2007

> > I installed the latest version (2.7) of ELOG and having the problem that the quick filter only works when hitting the 
> > enter-key when there is only one free text field (subtext). Whene having two or more free text field you have to use 
> > the tab-key or click onto the elog icon. We are using Internet Explorer, not tested on Mozilla right now.
> 
> I found that this is indeed an Internet Explorer bug, since it works with all other browsers I tested. There is however a
> workaround: I added some code to the current version of elog which shows a "Search" button whenever the page is accessed
> through the Internet Explorer. Then the behavior of hitting <return> works again. The change is in revision #1970 and will
> be contained in the next release.

Thanks again for your help!

65668

Thu Nov 29 21:40:29 2007

Hello,

one idea for improvement. When using the option 'Icon comment' this comment is shown when creating a new entry and moving with he mouse over the icon but it is not displayed in full or summary view. In full or summary view the filename is shown. Not really important, but perhaps an improvement.

Thanks!

Uwe

65672

Mon Dec 3 09:05:16 2007

Uwe wrote:

I implemented this request in SVN revision #1974.

65673