Re: How many topgroups can be defined?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 17 12:55:07 2007
|
| Exaos Lee wrote: | I defined 6 top groups in my cfg file as the attachment.
But ... It doesn't work as I wanted.
The 4th and 5th groups need login. But when I clicked the 4th or 5th group, the login isn't needed.
And the 4th and 5th password files are not generated automatically. |
When changing groups and to groups, one can sometimes get fooled by old cookies. Delete all your cookies and try again. You can also install the "Tamper Data" extension for Firefox (https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/966/) which shows you which cookies are sent to your ELOG server. This should reveal the problem. |
Hiding attributes in Detail view?, posted by Justin Ellison on Fri Mar 2 16:39:22 2007
|
First off, thanks so much for this product. It works excellent for us as a server activity log. I have a question, which depending on the answer, might be a feature request 
As I mentioned, we use elog as a serverlog. Sometimes, but not always, we will have a Bugzilla bug # that is associated with the log entry. We then take that bug #, and build a link to our bugzilla server displaying the bug. Here's the relevant config entries:
Attributes = Author, Classification, Subject, Bug Number, Environment, Server, Bugzilla
...
#Make the list table narrow enough to fit in the browser
List display = ID, Date, Author, Subject, Server, Bugzilla
...
#We take in a Bug Number from the user, then calculate a Bugzilla link from that
Change Bugzilla = <a href="http://bugz:4545/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=$Bug Number">$Bug Number</a>
List Change Bugzilla = <a href="http://bugz:4545/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=$Bug Number">$Bug Number</a>
Hidden Attributes = Bugzilla
So, on new entry, the user has the option to enter a Bug Number. Bugzilla is not displayed because it is derived. In list view, Bug Number is not displayed, but Bugzilla is, providing a handy link to the bug on a different server.
The only thing that isn't working as I'd like is when someone views a log entry. Both Bug Number and Bugzilla show up in the attributes. This isn't a huge deal, it's just showing redundant data.
Is there a way to hide Bug Number on the view page? |
|
Re: Hiding attributes in Detail view?, posted by Justin Ellison on Fri Mar 9 22:14:57 2007
|
| Any takers? |
|
Re: Hiding attributes in Detail view?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Mar 12 20:35:17 2007
|
| Justin Ellison wrote: | The only thing that isn't working as I'd like is when someone views a log entry. Both Bug Number and Bugzilla show up in the attributes. This isn't a huge deal, it's just showing redundant data.
Is there a way to hide Bug Number on the view page? |
In revision 1809 I implemented the options
Show attributes = ...
Show attributed edit = ...
The first one is for the log entry page, the second for the entry form. This way you can distinguish between the bug number and the link. The old option Hidden attributes has been dropped, since it has the same effect now as Show attributes edit. |
Addition of a "Restrict edit attribute" option?, posted by Justin Ellison on Tue Mar 13 17:27:49 2007
|
It would be a nice addition to have a config file option named "Restrict edit attribute".
Basically, I would like to have an attribute that was either:
a) An Option Attribute named Status with options of "Open" or "Closed"
b) An Option Attribute named Closed that was boolean.
Then, we could leave the item as editable until either choice "a" above was set to closed or choice "b" was true, at which point only admins could edit the item.
Sound plausible?
Justin |
|
Re: Addition of a "Restrict edit attribute" option?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 13 20:58:07 2007
|
| Justin Ellison wrote: | It would be a nice addition to have a config file option named "Restrict edit attribute".
Basically, I would like to have an attribute that was either:
a) An Option Attribute named Status with options of "Open" or "Closed"
b) An Option Attribute named Closed that was boolean.
Then, we could leave the item as editable until either choice "a" above was set to closed or choice "b" was true, at which point only admins could edit the item.
|
Conditional attributes? Like:
Attributes = ..., Status
Options Status = Open{1}, Closed{2}
{2}Locked attributes = Status
Unfortunately once it's locked, the admin has to change the config file to unlock it. |
|
Re: Addition of a "Restrict edit attribute" option?, posted by Justin Ellison on Wed Mar 14 15:03:41 2007
|
Sorry, I didn't explain it enough.
This feature is like "Restrict edit time", but instead of setting an entire entry as read only after n hours, we set it read only if attribute y is true. Admin would be able to go in and reset that attribute to false to unlock the entry for editing, but no one else would be able to.
That make more sense?
Justin |
|
Re: Addition of a "Restrict edit attribute" option?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 14 15:06:27 2007
|
| Justin Ellison wrote: | Sorry, I didn't explain it enough.
This feature is like "Restrict edit time", but instead of setting an entire entry as read only after n hours, we set it read only if attribute y is true. Admin would be able to go in and reset that attribute to false to unlock the entry for editing, but no one else would be able to. |
I understand what you want. The conditional attributes I showed you give you that functionality, except that unlocking is a bit painful for the admin (has to edit the config file each time). Sorry, but that's all I can give you. |
|