| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
66482
|
Wed Jul 29 13:23:41 2009 |
 | T. Ribbrock | emgaron+elog@ribbrock.org | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.6r2233 | Re: Odd problem (bug?) with certain attribute |
| T. Ribbrock wrote: |
|
Very nice, thank you! Given that I also still have to test the fix you made for the crash problem with "shared" logbooks (I assume it's also present in 2244), I'll upgrade and report back (probably tomorrow).
|
2244 is now running, and indeed, the "Size" attribute works now. Thank you!  |
|
66483
|
Wed Jul 29 14:48:34 2009 |
| T. Ribbrock | emgaron+elog@ribbrock.org | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.6r2233 | Re: Crashes when editing entries |
By now, I've installed 2244 and ran some rudimentary tests. So far, I was not able to reproduce the crash anymore. Looking good! |
|
66523
|
Wed Sep 2 09:39:20 2009 |
| james Goedsir | james.goedsir@stratosglobal.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.7 | Re: Time Display Format |
| james Goedsir wrote: |
|
My Time field is displayed i a 12 Hour format I would like to change it to 24 Hours, can someone advised how it can be done
|
Sorted no problem |
|
66543
|
Mon Sep 14 13:04:57 2009 |
| Gillian Sabberton | elog@gks.thamespower.com | Other | Other | ? | Re: Elog stopped working |
| Gillian Sabberton wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Gillian Sabberton wrote: |
|
We have been running elog for a couple of years now and this morning it stopped working.
We have tried to rstart it and it says successful start but still does not run, when doing a restart it says stop failed start success.
Does anyone have any ideas.
thanks
|
You shoudl start elogd interactively in a DOS box to see if there is any error. Maybe disk full or a network problem...
|
It is running on a linux box, we have started in it in a telnet session, and no errors appear, as I am new to e-log is there an error log anywhere.
|
Have fixed this by removing the last added user from the Passwd file. |
|
66544
|
Mon Sep 14 13:05:35 2009 |
| Gillian Sabberton | elog@gks.thamespower.com | Other | Other | ? | Re: Elog stopped working |
| Gillian Sabberton wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Gillian Sabberton wrote: |
|
We have been running elog for a couple of years now and this morning it stopped working.
We have tried to rstart it and it says successful start but still does not run, when doing a restart it says stop failed start success.
Does anyone have any ideas.
thanks
|
You shoudl start elogd interactively in a DOS box to see if there is any error. Maybe disk full or a network problem...
|
It is running on a linux box, we have started in it in a telnet session, and no errors appear, as I am new to e-log is there an error log anywhere.
|
Have fixed this by removing the last added user from the Passwd file. |
|
66627
|
Mon Nov 23 13:17:53 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | 2.7.7-2266 | Re: Attachments and images of attachments |
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > I attached a 12 page (22kB) pdf file - no images - to an entry, but elog only converted the first 8 pages to
> > images (.png). This is reproducable, i.e. a different small multipage pdf file produced the same number of images.
> >
> > The size of the pdf file does not seem to be a problem, a single page pdf file with a lot of images in it
> > attached as expected.
> >
> > Is this correct, or a defined limitation?
>
> This is a defined limitation. Sometimes people attach whole books in PDF form to an entry, and you don't want to end up
> with hundreds of images cluttering your browser. If you want to see the full document, just load it into your PDF viewer.
Thanks, Stefan (why is this answer down under my name!?)
I couldn't find reference to this in the documentation. In the case I referred to, I'll have to play with the pdf so that
the six pages I actually want displayed are. |
|
66632
|
Thu Nov 26 20:37:02 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.7- | Re: "Reply to" Author in this forum |
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > This has happened twice on this forum now, starting from Mon 23rd November.
> >
> > Someone submits an entry (Me, 66625, Bertram Metz 66628)
> > I assume you post a reply (66626, 66629), but it shows up as if I or Bertram are the author of the reply, not
> > yourself. My reply to you (66627) was really authored by me, and I expressed puzzlement then at this point.
> >
> > Is this a bug, or some wierd affect of us forgetting to log out?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > David.
>
> Thanks for pointing out this issue. This bug was introduced recently, when I tried to avoid the
>
> Re: Re: Re: ...
>
> in the subject line. I changed this now completely so that we can have
>
> Preset on reply Author = $full_name
> Preset on first reply Subject = Re: $Subject
>
> which fixes both things. The modification is in revision 2271.
Thanks Stefan! |
|
66729
|
Sat Mar 6 19:13:55 2010 |
| Paul Paquette | ppaquette@town.hampton.nh.us | Question | Windows | 2.7.8.2282 | Limit elog e-mail to only people involved with an entry |
Howdy and Thank you in advance.
Can I limit an elog entry mails to only go to my e-mail, my supervisor and the person who is entering the elog entry. I have the Elog server on Windows XP Pro running version 2.7.8.2282.
Thank you
Paul
|