Large log file size, posted by Alan Grant on Mon Aug 30 03:08:15 2021
|
Can the size of the application log file affect performance? |
Log4j exploit, posted by Alan Grant on Tue Dec 14 19:16:57 2021
|
Is there any potential impact/concern with the Log4j exploit in Elog applications?
|
Slow performance, posted by Alan Grant on Tue Jun 28 18:53:50 2022
|
We're up to 30 logbooks, 3.2GB data total and Elog damen has now become slow. Performance stats show 100%CPU on startup then reduces. Searches and
general UI activity is slow. It runs on a VM with 4GB memory allocated. Up to 15 concurrent users.
Trimming and archiving some data files may help but I gather overall this is underpowered hardware in this instance so what is recommended |
Re: FCKeditor not active, posted by Alain Hugentobler on Wed Apr 2 01:27:20 2008
|
Kevin O'Sullivan wrote:
I'm using ELOG version 2.7.3-2058 and have been trying to get FCKeditor to work. This, to my understanding |
Trouble with Find and Conditional attributes, posted by Adam Fairbrother on Thu Apr 28 22:38:00 2016
|
I seem to be having some trouble with Find when using conditional attributes.
when I change the primary attribute in the find field, the corrispnding secondary attribute dosn't refresh properly with the list of values.
I am able to use the conditional options as expected when creating a new logbook. |
Re: Trouble with Find and Conditional attributes, posted by Adam Fairbrother on Thu Apr 28 22:54:08 2016
|
This may be due to how I have my config file setup
Example:
Attributes = A, B |
Re: Trouble with Find and Conditional attributes, posted by Adam Fairbrother on Fri Apr 29 20:37:04 2016
|
Uppon closer inspection, removing the option to preset the secondary attribute as a Option list dosn't do anything for the find page.
This:
Attributes = A, B |
Attribute substitution in email configuration, posted by Adam Blandford on Wed Jan 18 02:22:44 2006
|
In the logbook config file I am not able to use attribute substitution in the <string> tag for
[CODE]Use Email Heading = <string>[/CODE]
Attribute substitution does work however for
|