Re: Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 22 13:46:57 2005
|
> I have defined a new field called "Record Date" to accept the dates from a
> previous logging system. I am not too concerned with the timestamp
> associated with these old imported entries. But for new entries...
> There is no way I am able enter/edit the time into my new field. They all
> show as having a time of 12:00. What am I doing wrong? Here is a portion of
> my config
Date is "date", and not "date-time" unfortunately. There is no way right now to
enter a time. I plan however to add a new format "datetime", which allows that
option. So stay tuned.
- Stefan |
|
Re: Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by mark james on Tue Mar 22 23:27:21 2005
|
Stefan,
Oh. OK. I will keep tuned. It would be quite useful to have.
Mark
> > I have defined a new field called "Record Date" to accept the dates from a
> > previous logging system. I am not too concerned with the timestamp
> > associated with these old imported entries. But for new entries...
> > There is no way I am able enter/edit the time into my new field. They all
> > show as having a time of 12:00. What am I doing wrong? Here is a portion of
> > my config
>
> Date is "date", and not "date-time" unfortunately. There is no way right now to
> enter a time. I plan however to add a new format "datetime", which allows that
> option. So stay tuned.
>
> - Stefan |
Re: Expand all at elog home, posted by Alex H on Fri Mar 25 12:49:13 2005 
|
> Hi,
>
> Is there a command line in the configuration files to show all of sub
logs
> on the main page of elog instead of clicking on "Expand All" on the top
of
> ELOG ?
>
> Thanks
Up ! :o)
So I have posted a picture to explain better my question.
So could it be possible to have the index page always expanded ?
thanks for answers.
Alex. |
|
Re: Expand all at elog home, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 29 09:57:29 2005
|
> So I have posted a picture to explain better my question.
> So could it be possible to have the index page always expanded ?
> thanks for answers.
I added a new configuration option "Expand selection page" which defaults to
one. So if nothing is changed in the configuration file, the logbook selection
page is expanded by default. Only if one has very many logbooks and wants back
the old behaviour, one has to add "Expand selection page = 0" in the config
file. The new version is under CVS. |
|
Re: Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 30 11:07:08 2005
|
I implemented a "datetime" option which does exactly what you want. All you
need is a
Type Record Date = datetime
in your config file. The new option is present in version 2.5.8-2 and ready to
download. |
Re: Expand all at elog home, posted by Alex H on Wed Mar 30 15:12:54 2005
|
> > So I have posted a picture to explain better my question.
> > So could it be possible to have the index page always expanded ?
> > thanks for answers.
>
> I added a new configuration option "Expand selection page" which defaults to
> one. So if nothing is changed in the configuration file, the logbook selection
> page is expanded by default. Only if one has very many logbooks and wants back
> the old behaviour, one has to add "Expand selection page = 0" in the config
> file. The new version is under CVS.
Many many Thanks for all Stefan ! :o) |
|
HTML-File as attachement, posted by Becher on Tue Apr 5 22:39:20 2005
|
When I upload a HTML-File as attachement the file is shown as the
HTML-source and not as the formatted text. Is there a possibility to see the
HTML-attachements as formatted text like images are shown as images? |
|
Re: HTML-File as attachement, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 5 22:45:22 2005
|
> When I upload a HTML-File as attachement the file is shown as the
> HTML-source and not as the formatted text. Is there a possibility to see the
> HTML-attachements as formatted text like images are shown as images?
I could turn the ASCII display off, but the result is not always what you want.
If you have a HTML file without the <html>, <header> and <body> tags, it's ok.
But if you have these tags in your HTML (and this is the normal case), the
resulting page has these tags twice, once from the ELOG page and once from the
attachment. This confuses some browsers, so the resulting page might look
strange. A solution would be to strip these tags from the attachment, but for
that I would have to interprete the HTML attachment completely, which is too
much work.
So I will turn the ASCII display off in the next release, but be prepared to see
some nonexpected results. |