| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
65856
|
Fri Apr 25 17:15:12 2008 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: how to set locale for date/time |
| svrmarty wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| svrmarty wrote: |
|
is there any new option i can use/configure ?
i still get the english datetime
Eingabezeit: Thu Mar 27 09:27:41 2008
|
As I told you, you have to upgrade to SVN revision 2098 or later.
|
i've updated to ELOG V2.7.3-2104
|
Well, then you should get German locale. I just tried with the same version and following elogd.cfg, so I don't know what you are doing wrong:
[global]
port = 8080
language = german
[demo]
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
|
|
65857
|
Fri Apr 25 17:19:27 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: configuration of rss feeds |
| W.Koster wrote: |
| Is it possible to change what is being shown in the rss-feed ? (like only name, date and subject in the list and text and other attributes in the text-pane below the rss-feed list (I hope you can figure out what I mean). Regards, W. |
Have you tried the "RSS Title" option? |
|
65859
|
Fri Apr 25 19:56:48 2008 |
| svrmarty | svrmarty@gmx.net | Question | | | Re: how to set locale for date/time |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| svrmarty wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| svrmarty wrote: |
|
is there any new option i can use/configure ?
i still get the english datetime
Eingabezeit: Thu Mar 27 09:27:41 2008
|
As I told you, you have to upgrade to SVN revision 2098 or later.
|
i've updated to ELOG V2.7.3-2104
|
Well, then you should get German locale. I just tried with the same version and following elogd.cfg, so I don't know what you are doing wrong:
[global]
port = 8080
language = german
[demo]
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
|
great, works now
thx a lot
i had to create de_DE locales, we only use de_AT, this is for austria, where we live
|
|
65862
|
Mon Apr 28 13:37:01 2008 |
| W.Koster | W.Koster@rug.nl | Question | | | Re: configuration of rss feeds | > Have you tried the RSS Title option?
doh ... thanks, works perfectly (well apart from the lost end-of-lines in the text portion) |
|
65863
|
Tue Apr 29 02:00:03 2008 |
| Dennis Seitz | dseitz@cosmology.berkeley.edu | Question | | 2.7.0 | Re: Possible to sort attribute chronologically? | > > The only caveat is that
> > when you edit an entry, the "Last Edit" is displayed really in seconds since 1970, but I will
> > fix this in the next release.
>
> I just fixed this in SVN revision #2010. If you would have filled out which operating system you use
> with elog, I could tell you how to upgrade.
Thank you for pointing out the method to identify Last Edit as a datetime type so that it will sort properly. I now have created Last Edit in several
preexisting logbooks.
I want to use
Start page = ?rsort=Last Edit
to set the default sorting of each logbook to be by Last Edit.
However, all of the entries made before I added Last Edit have no value for that field, so they are all grouped together at the end of the sort. So I
decided to go through the older entries and set Last Edit equal to the original entry date, as a starting value.
I tried to use the command
Subst on edit Last Edit = $entry time
but it gives a "-" for the Last Edit value when I edit an entry.
I think this is because $entry time is not a variable supported by Subst. Can you add that support, or else tell me if you know a better way to go about
doing what I'm attempting? Is there perhaps a way to globally process a group of entries in a logbook and set one attribute's value to be equal to
another's?
Thanks |
|
65878
|
Mon May 12 10:16:21 2008 |
 | Grant Jeffcote | grant@jeffcote.org | Question | | 2.7.3-1024 | Access Control | Hi Stefan,
We have a configuration where different sites have their own logbooks all under the same server, these are accessed by relevant parties as you might expect by selecting the appropriate tab at the top of the page.
Everyone has visibility of everyone elses logbook as a guest but we have purposely limited the 'Guest' users view (hiding the text portion etc) for various reasons.
We would now like to allow certain parties to view certain logbooks in their entirety but with a 'Read Only' view, I see this can be done but only using a common password. (Read password = <encoded password>)
At present we can give others a full view by adding them to the 'Users' list for each individual logbook, this unfortunately also gives them 'write' access. Also if they click on the tab for a logbook that they are not a 'User' for they are logged out of their existing logbook forcing them to have to log back on. If they are designated in a 'Read Only' viewers list for that logbook then their existing password would presumably be read from the global password file and they wouldn't be logged out?
I would like to be able to implement a 'Read' access view for some parties but not have a common password (use the password file?) and not force the other party to re-logon to view the other logbook.
Something like the ability to add a "Read user = <user list>" in each logbook as can be done with 'Login User' and 'Admin User' at present would be great.
Could you let me know if this is feasible please?
Many thanks in advance. |
|
65879
|
Tue May 13 16:58:40 2008 |
| Yoshio Imai | | Question | | 2.7.3-1024 | Re: Access Control |
| Grant Jeffcote wrote: | | At present we can give others a full view by adding them to the 'Users' list for each individual logbook, this unfortunately also gives them 'write' access. |
I think the solution to your problem would be to use Deny statements in the configuration sections for the logbooks.
Assume user1, user2 and user3 are in the "owners'" group of logbook1, and user4 and user5 only have "privileged read" access. Then a configuration as follows might help:
Login user = user1, user2, user3, user4, user5
Deny New = user4, user5
Deny Reply = user4, user5
Deny Duplicate = user4, user5
Deny Edit = user4, user5
Deny Delete = user4, user5
Deny Select = user4, user5
Deny CSV Import = user4, user5
This should give them the same read permissions as the logbook owners but should deny any writing operations. I recognize that this is a little bit of admin work if the lists of such "privileged readers" gets long, but each user would have his/her individual password (even the same as for access to his/her "own" logbook).
Perhaps you can give it a try. |
|
65880
|
Tue May 13 21:56:30 2008 |
| Grant Jeffcote | grant@jeffcote.org | Question | | 2.7.3-1024 | Re: Access Control |
| Yoshio Imai wrote: |
| Grant Jeffcote wrote: | | At present we can give others a full view by adding them to the 'Users' list for each individual logbook, this unfortunately also gives them 'write' access. |
I think the solution to your problem would be to use Deny statements in the configuration sections for the logbooks.
Assume user1, user2 and user3 are in the "owners'" group of logbook1, and user4 and user5 only have "privileged read" access. Then a configuration as follows might help:
Login user = user1, user2, user3, user4, user5
Deny New = user4, user5
Deny Reply = user4, user5
Deny Duplicate = user4, user5
Deny Edit = user4, user5
Deny Delete = user4, user5
Deny Select = user4, user5
Deny CSV Import = user4, user5
This should give them the same read permissions as the logbook owners but should deny any writing operations. I recognize that this is a little bit of admin work if the lists of such "privileged readers" gets long, but each user would have his/her individual password (even the same as for access to his/her "own" logbook).
Perhaps you can give it a try. |
What a great solution, thanks Yoshio, it works a treat. |
|