Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 801 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Emaildown Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  69670   Wed May 17 17:43:46 2023 Reply Illam PakkirisamyHi illam@senseeker.comInfoWindows3.1.4Re: TEXTSIZE too big message

Hi Xuan,

Sorry for the delayed response.  I just got back from my travel.  I tried your solution, but in my system I don't see elogd.h in the src folder.  Here is what I see and also I don't see any "make" binary in the folders.  I'm running the Windows version.

Thanks.
Illam

Xuan Wu wrote:

Hi Illam,

You can find it in src/elogd.h, #define TEXT_SIZE  250000, the original value 250000, you can change it to a larger one like #define TEXT_SIZE    1000000. Then recompile it again, just need typing "make". Elog Version is 3.1.3 in my site. HTH.

Cheers,

Xuan Wu

Illam Pakkirisamy wrote:

Hi,  any help will be appreciated on this.  I have not still figured this out.

Thanks.
Illam

Illam Pakkirisamy wrote:

Hi,

I'm getting the TEXTSIZE TOO BIG message every time I have more text in my entry.  I understand there is a way to increase the TEXTSIZE and re-compile.  Where can I find the TEXTSIZE parameter that I can increase and also how do I re-compile.

Appreciate your help.

Thanks.
Illam

 

 

 

  69663   Tue Apr 11 12:51:12 2023 Reply Finn JunkerHi fj@tvis.netInfoLinux | Mac OSX3.1.5Re: New elog version 3.1.5

Hi Stefan

Is there anything the community or forum can help you with or supply for creating a windows version?

Kind Regards Finn

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A new version 3.1.5 of elog has been released with all accumulated fixes over the past actually few years. I made a tar file, a RPM, but I could not compile yet a windows version.

https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download.html

Best,
Stefan

 

  69801   Mon Jul 15 09:45:56 2024 Reply Enrico GamberiniHi Laureenrico.gamberini@cern.chBug reportLinux3.1.5-20240226Re: broken http response when deployed on OpenShift

Hi Laurent,

Thanks, good point! I'm building a vanilla version (no extra options enabled as I'm using Webserver authentication).

3.15 RPM:

-rwxr-xr-x. 1 elog elog 1574768 Feb 26 17:29 elogd

bash-5.1$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/elogd 
    linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff215f7000)
    libssl.so.3 => /lib64/libssl.so.3 (0x00007feff74c6000)
    libkrb5.so.3 => /lib64/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00007feff73eb000)
    libldap.so.2 => /lib64/libldap.so.2 (0x00007feff7384000)
    liblber.so.2 => /lib64/liblber.so.2 (0x00007feff7372000)
    libpam.so.0 => /lib64/libpam.so.0 (0x00007feff7360000)
    libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007feff7139000)
    libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007feff705c000)
    libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007feff7041000)
    libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007feff6e38000)
    libcrypto.so.3 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.3 (0x00007feff6a07000)
    libk5crypto.so.3 => /lib64/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00007feff69ee000)
    libcom_err.so.2 => /lib64/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00007feff69e7000)
    libkrb5support.so.0 => /lib64/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x00007feff69d4000)
    libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib64/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x00007feff69cd000)
    libresolv.so.2 => /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x00007feff69b9000)
    libevent-2.1.so.7 => /lib64/libevent-2.1.so.7 (0x00007feff6960000)
    libsasl2.so.3 => /lib64/libsasl2.so.3 (0x00007feff6940000)
    libaudit.so.1 => /lib64/libaudit.so.1 (0x00007feff6912000)
    libeconf.so.0 => /lib64/libeconf.so.0 (0x00007feff6905000)
    /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007feff7572000)
    libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007feff68eb000)
    libselinux.so.1 => /lib64/libselinux.so.1 (0x00007feff68be000)
    libcrypt.so.2 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.2 (0x00007feff6884000)
    libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00007feff682d000)
    libcap-ng.so.0 => /lib64/libcap-ng.so.0 (0x00007feff6822000)
    libpcre2-8.so.0 => /lib64/libpcre2-8.so.0 (0x00007feff6786000)

    
3.15 source vanilla build:

-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1503896 Jul 15 09:31 elogd

bash-5.1$ ldd elogd
    linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff60bbf000)
    libssl.so.3 => /lib64/libssl.so.3 (0x00007f8f83e44000)
    libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f8f83c1b000)
    libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f8f83b40000)
    libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f8f83b25000)
    libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f8f8391c000)
    libcrypto.so.3 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.3 (0x00007f8f834e9000)
    /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f8f83ef0000)
    libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f8f834cd000)

Best,
Enrico

Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote:

Hey Enrico,

Do you activate also all options with your build ? (pam/ldap/kb5/ssl)

Can you compare ldd command results on elogd binaries builded by yourself and the one from RPM ?

$ ldd /path/to/elogd

Also, size of both elogd files.

Regards

 

Enrico Gamberini wrote:

Sorry for posting again but something else came up.

Actually, building from source (elog-3.1.5-1.tar.gz) works just fine on OpenShift too.

The problem described below only happens when installing the packaged binary elog-3.1.5-20240226.el9.x86_64.rpm.

Best,
Enrico

Enrico Gamberini wrote:

Hello!

We're setting up ELOG on OpenShift. ELOG is installed on a Alma Linux 9 image. The container and the elog demo works fine executing the docker image locally.

When deployed on OpenShift, we get a weird response, that results in a 502 Bad Gateway. The broken response looks like:
 

# curl -v -H 'X-Forwarded-User: enrico.gamberini@cern.ch' https://psi-elog-container2-elisa-epdtdi.app.cern.ch/demo/

<html>redir</html>
HTTP/1.1 200 Document follows
HTTP/1.1 200 Document follows
Server: ELOG HTTP 3.1.5-23df00d
Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1
Set-Cookie: elmode=Summary; path=/demo; expires=Friday, 07-Dec-35 06:30:26 GMT;
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-control: private, max-age=0, no-cache, no-store

 

Notice the HTML tag before the HTTP header, as well the duplicate HTTP header.

I understand that it might be difficult to reproduce, but any input would be very welcome!

Thanks!

Best,
Enrico

 

 

 

  69660   Tue Mar 21 14:25:25 2023 Reply Daniel SajdykHello,daniel.sajdyk@gmail.comQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-dc4af9b8Re: HTML Editor not working after enabling SSL

Hello,

I found that someone else had the same issue - https://dev.ckeditor.com/ticket/10874#no1

In Firefox I do not have problems, but in Chrome and Edge i have. 

His solution was:

My problem is solved. The .htaccess file sents any request to the login page. Therefore CKEditor could not reach the CSS file. Thanks for helping!

Sinse I don't use apache webserver, I don't know what should I do. 

It looks that also in my case problem is with file progressjs.min.css (please look at attached screenshot)

Anyone have solution for this?

Best Regards

Daniel

Daniel Sajdyk wrote:

Hello,

After enabling SSL=1 in /usr/loca/elog/elogd.cfg file, HTML editor loading very long. 

After changing SSL to 0, everything work flawlessly.

Does anyone know what can cause this behaviour?

Best Regards
Daniel

 

  Draft   Tue Mar 21 14:25:25 2023 Reply Daniel SajdykHello,daniel.sajdyk@gmail.comQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-dc4af9b8Re: HTML Editor not working after enabling SSL

Hello,

I found that someon

Daniel Sajdyk wrote:

Hello,

After enabling SSL=1 in /usr/loca/elog/elogd.cfg file, HTML editor loading very long. 

After changing SSL to 0, everything work flawlessly.

Does anyone know what can cause this behaviour?

Best Regards
Daniel

 

  Draft   Tue Mar 21 14:25:26 2023 Reply Daniel SajdykHello,daniel.sajdyk@gmail.comQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-dc4af9b8Re: HTML Editor not working after enabling SSL

Hello,

I found that someone else had the same issue - https://dev.ckeditor.com/ticket/10874#no1

But I don't know why

Daniel Sajdyk wrote:

Hello,

After enabling SSL=1 in /usr/loca/elog/elogd.cfg file, HTML editor loading very long. 

After changing SSL to 0, everything work flawlessly.

Does anyone know what can cause this behaviour?

Best Regards
Daniel

 

  69782   Mon Apr 15 17:50:20 2024 Reply Stefan RittHastefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindowsELOG V3.1.3-793Re: Record date isn't set to current date when replying to elogs

Have you tried the config option "Preset on reply <attribute> = $date". On a reply, the <attribute> will be preset with the current date.

Stefan

Celeste Torkzaban wrote:

Hello,

I started using the record date feature in one logbook, since we plan to copy over old entries Joplin/Onenote. When starting a new entry, I see that the record date is automatically set to the current date, but when I reply to an elog, the record date is automatically set to the record date of the elog I'm replying to. Is there a way to fix this?

 

 

  69653   Tue Feb 28 19:22:50 2023 Reply Stefan RittFind stefan.ritt@psi.chInfoWindows3.1.4Re: Exporting the entries from ELOG

Find -> Export to...

Illam Pakkirisamy wrote:

Hi,

Is there a way to export the ELOG entries into a file like an Excel sheet or something.  I see import but not export.

Appreciate your help.

Thanks.

Illam

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6