, posted by on Tue Mar 1 19:41:29 2005
|
For some reason it looses the "m" so line 5 instead of having
"hh:mm" has "hh: m"
Please ideas ;)
Cheers,
GL. |
, posted by on Tue Mar 1 19:41:29 2005
|
| |
|
, posted by on Sat Oct 6 14:05:01 2007
|
I ended with 125384 entries like the one above.
Everything works fine but ......... [U]tteerrrriibbllee[/U] [B]slow[/B]. CPU usage is constant at 99%.
I tried to split the one file produced by the import into 2 chunks but that did not improve the situation.
My question is : Is there a rule of thumb for the size of the "database" in which elog keeps it's performance, or better : is there a solution for this for elog.
|
|
, posted by on Wed Mar 24 15:07:14 106
|
| |
|
, posted by on Wed Mar 24 15:07:14 106
|
| |