Re: elog reaction is very slow, posted by Willem Koster on Tue Nov 19 14:11:11 2002
|
We had the same problem here. What worked in our case was:
Traffic to port 113 (identd) was blocked. Because the server didn't give any
|
Input text gets lost, posted by egli on Sat Nov 23 09:20:57 2002
|
Typing in a text for a new entry results in an error message, whenever
one forgets to fill in mandatory attributes (as it should happen !). However
after using the back button in this case (Using netscape 4.79) I made the
|
Re: Show all common attributes, posted by Stephan Egli on Tue Nov 26 18:04:43 2002
|
> > In the "find" command, when searching over all logbooks, it
> > would be nice to see ALL attributes, which are common for all
> > logbooks (e.g. typically the author name), not just
|
Re: Show all common attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 28 10:01:47 2002
|
> > > In the "find" command, when searching over all logbooks, it
> > > would be nice to see ALL attributes, which are common for all
> > > logbooks (e.g. typically the author name), not just
|
email notification to a specific adress, posted by Etienne Van Caillie on Sun Dec 22 16:49:20 2002
|
I have some problem with email notification
for some logbooks I would like to notify only to specific adress
I try
|
logbook db size causing very slow response, posted by eric wooten on Tue Dec 31 17:56:34 2002
|
Was wondering if there were any tweaks/suggestions for improving the
logbooks responsiviness. Our logbook was started 31 July 01. Since that
time we have went from 1 logbook to 4 logbooks. Logbook 1 having 2651
|
Re: email notification to a specific adress, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Jan 4 20:16:32 2003
|
> I have some problem with email notification
> for some logbooks I would like to notify only to specific adress
> I try
|
Re: logbook db size causing very slow response, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 9 10:25:10 2003
|
> Was wondering if there were any tweaks/suggestions for improving the
> logbooks responsiviness. Our logbook was started 31 July 01. Since that
> time we have went from 1 logbook to 4 logbooks. Logbook 1 having 2651
|