"full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Mon Aug 1 11:58:43 2005
|
Hi,
I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only the color is different. The texts
don't appear.
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 2 08:56:21 2005
|
[quote="Kees Bol"]I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only the color is different.
The texts don't appear.
Any idea what can cause this behaviour?[/quote]
|
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Tue Aug 2 10:25:32 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only
the color is different. The texts don't appear.
Any idea what can cause this behaviour?[/quote]
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Aug 4 22:35:57 2005 
|
[quote="Kees Bol"]I thougt when choosing the full-view the text would appear along with the other attributes.[/quote]
That's how it is supposed to be. I tried your config file, added three entries, and got the behaviour documented in the attached images. To me everything |
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Fri Aug 5 10:00:00 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]I thougt when choosing the full-view the text would appear along with the other attributes.[/quote]
That's how it is supposed to be. I tried your config file, added three entries, and got the behaviour documented in the attached images. To me everything |
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Fri Aug 5 10:51:27 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]I thougt when choosing the full-view the text would appear along with the other attributes.[/quote]
That's how it is supposed to be. I tried your config file, added three entries, and got the behaviour documented in the attached images. To me everything |
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Aug 5 10:54:49 2005
|
[quote="Kees Bol"]Stefan, I installed V2.6.0-beta3 and there is a (unwanted) difference. The Text field now appears in the summary-view despite the config
specifies:
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Kees Bol on Fri Aug 5 14:30:52 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kees Bol"]Stefan, I installed V2.6.0-beta3 and there is a (unwanted) difference. The Text field now appears in the summary-view
despite the config specifies:
|
|
Re: "full" only changes color, posted by Martin Rongen on Mon Jun 3 15:49:33 2013
|
[quote="Kees Bol"]Hi,
I have the strange problem that when changing to "full"-diplaymode the output looks the same as with "summary", only the color is different. The texts
don't appear.
|
Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Norm on Sat May 18 17:41:51 2013
|
I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version. Around 2008 I believe. I then received
an application failed to initialize properly 0xc0150002 after installing the newest version. I then tried installing the Feb 2013 version and received
the same message. Panicked, I rolled back our server to its state yesterday. I would like to update our elog software, anyone know why I am |
|
Re: Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue May 21 14:33:09 2013
|
Norm wrote:
I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version. Around 2008 I believe. I then |
|
Re: Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Norm on Sat May 25 16:09:58 2013
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
|
Re: Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Norm on Sat Jun 1 20:20:03 2013
|
Andreas Luedeke wrote:
|
|
Re: Application failed to initialize properly, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Mon Jun 3 13:56:35 2013
|
Norm wrote:
|
|
hyperlink other elog posts, posted by Remington Tyler Thornton on Tue May 28 19:01:42 2013
|
I am on an experiment that used ELOG for all documentation and meeting notes. In our meeting notes we link to elog posts that had been discussed during
the meeting. We had done this by hyperlinking the URL to the entry. Recently we had to move our logbook to another machine and so none of our hyperlinks
work since the URLs have changed. I noticed that when one creates a new entry in the subject they can reference another post. Is there a way to link another |
|
Re: hyperlink other elog posts, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed May 29 14:57:23 2013
|
Remington Tyler Thornton wrote:
I am on an experiment that used ELOG for all documentation and meeting notes. In our meeting notes we |
|
Elog command line problem, posted by Razvan Gornea on Tue May 28 09:16:18 2013
|
I'm trying to use the command line to post automatically entries from a web based calendar. I run elogd behind SSL with user/pass configuration. I created
an account for the calendar and used the following command line.
[gornea@lheppc63 ~] |
|
Admin delete option, posted by Hal Proctor on Wed May 22 22:24:14 2013
|
How can I show the Delete option for Admins?
So I have a logbook with the following config:
|
|
some menu commands formed with broken links, posted by Ken Ludington on Tue May 7 22:15:37 2013
|
On many of my logbooks when I specify the menu commands to appear i will get one, usually 'List', which has a
link not back to the logbook itself but to the root of the elog web server i.e. http:/hostname.domain:8080
But nothing will respond without the logbook name after the port number. This also seems to be happening to the
|
|
Re: some menu commands formed with broken links, posted by Garret Delaronde on Fri May 10 17:24:55 2013
|
> On many of my logbooks when I specify the menu commands to appear i will get one, usually 'List', which has a
> link not back to the logbook itself but to the root of the elog web server i.e. http:/hostname.domain:8080
> But nothing will respond without the logbook name after the port number. This also seems to be happening to the
|
|
Re: some menu commands formed with broken links, posted by Ken Ludington on Fri May 10 19:26:50 2013
|
Here's the global section and the logbook section for one of the logbooks affected. Of note, the 'demo' logbook works
fine and does not have this issue.
|
|
Re: some menu commands formed with broken links, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri May 17 15:26:50 2013
|
> Top group 2012 = 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, WINTER
Your usage of "Top group" is strange. Top groups should only be used for independent groups of logbooks, more like you were running one dedicated sever |
|
Kerberos on Windows server, posted by Hal Proctor on Mon May 13 16:44:05 2013
|
| Does anyone have a success story with kerberos on windows? |
|
Re: Kerberos on Windows server, posted by Hal Proctor on Thu May 16 16:29:16 2013
|
Hal Proctor wrote:
|
|
Multi Language based on logged on user?, posted by Hal Proctor on Thu May 16 15:41:34 2013
|
| Can ELog support different languages based on the logged on user? |