Re: Format Form, posted by Tim Schelfhout on Mon Oct 2 15:20:04 2017
|
Thankx 4 the quick reply Stefan. The link you provided does not work .... could you point me again in the
right direction? Where can I find more info on this ability?
Thankx
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
The way and entry form can be customized is kind of limited in elog. You can use "format <attribute> = ..." to request a certain width, number of allowed characters and special CSS class (which of course you have to define). If you want a complete custom entry form, have a look here: elog:66909 . This requires however writing your own HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
Stefan
| Tim Schelfhout wrote: |
|
Hello there,
I am trying to format my entry form a little bit more practical and readable. I am struggling with the following:
- Numbers should be standard fields of 3 characters and can only be 3 characters wide (doing this by Format Leeftijd=1, css, 3, 3)
- Text Entry fields should be max. width of 15 characters ?
Also struggling with mutliple fields on one line:
- Can Spacing between fields be controlled? Even vertical spacing?
- When omitting the css in the Format syntax, the fieldname and field gets colored dark blue
.. found via css inspection a part solution using this (Format Leeftijd=1, attribname, 3, 3), but then the value still gets colored dark blue
Also I see that when one formats the entry field in edit mode it shows differently in list mode. (for example set width is not enforced in list mode)
Anyone ?
|
|
|
Date must be between 1970 and 2037??, posted by Tim Schelfhout on Wed Oct 11 15:55:02 2017
|
Hey there,
Trying to record birthdates in ELOG ... field type being date results in error:
| Date must be between 1970 and 2037 |
Can this be avoided? I like the fact that one can use the date picker to enter birthdate |
|
Config: conditional coloring of items when 2 conditions are met (and|or), posted by Tim Schelfhout on Fri Nov 24 08:54:38 2017
|
Hello,
Trying to color an entry log when 2 conditions are met. Tried
Style Result Hired and Administration NOK = background-color:red
where Result and Administration are Attributes. Anyone?
|
Unsafe browsing, posted by Tim Schelfhout on Mon Jan 15 15:56:07 2018
|
Hello there,
Can anyone point out to me how I can avoid the unsafe browsing when accessing our local ELOG?
Browsing with chrome and always getting the unsafe browsing page. One has to go through the advanced
button to continue ...
I once had my setup with SSL certificate (local signed, not through the CA) but I somehow cannot get it
to work anymore. Just create a local certificate and copy the certificates to all browsers that access the ELOG site, no?
Anyway, a small guide would be great. |
test, posted by Tim Schel on Wed Mar 25 10:36:15 2015
|
zezerze |
Strange browser behaviour with chrome?, posted by Tim Schel on Mon Mar 30 14:46:28 2015 
|
Hello there,
I have been using ELOG for 4 years now and all of a sudden I see a strange behaviour.
As you can see in the screenshots below I have configured 6 logbooks (tabs) ... only 2
display (colors in CSS?) correctly as configured.
There haven't been any changes recently configuration wise .. but I suspect my chrome
has been upgraded silently.
Any ideas why one logbook (see screenshot 2) called Kandidaten would display
correctly and the other called DSP doesn't?
The first screenshot displays all rows in blue and purple letters ....
The Logbook Stagiairs even has multiple behaviours .... some of it sub books display correctly
and some don't.
I have a new colleague since a few days who uses the ELOG as well but using Internet Explorer
and she doesn't have this strange behaviour. I can rule out configuration error since
I stripped configuration and added verbosity logging level up and nothing was detected.
Is this possible solely due to chrome update (of which I am not even sure).
I looked at the CSS source of both screenshots and I notice that in the first case (wrong!)
there is no CSS class attributed to the TD elements.
Anyway I can understand that the browser displays everything wrong ... but this behaviour
I cannot explain. |
Link To command..., posted by Tim Iskander on Mon Apr 18 17:57:38 2005
|
Is it possible to create a Link To command (ala Copy To, Move To) that
would allow you to reference an entry in another log book without copying it?
This would be handy as the info would be kept current in both log books.
My thought is that it would create a psuedo entry in the other log
book that pointed back at the originating log book entry (similar to a
UNIX soft link)
/Tim |
|
Request: can the comment for a log book be put in the status bar on hover, posted by Tim Iskander on Wed Jul 6 16:02:30 2005
|
We have several logbooks running here with somewhat cryptic names. The comment field for the
logbook describes its intent well enough, so the thought was that the comment could show up in the
status bar (or tooltip) when you hover over the logbook name in the tabs at the top of the page.
___ yea 
___ nea 
/Tim |