Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 94 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
IDdown Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  69094   Fri Jan 24 21:04:51 2020 Reply Johnsecondcomingtechnologies@fastmail.comQuestionLinux | Windows3.1.3Re: local usage on windows + Linux virtual machine
Elog does not access the outside world by default. With the VM I suppose just access it via the Linux local ip address (and port).
 
Sara Vanini wrote:

Hello again, 

I love to use elog, but I don't need any other accessing it for the moment. So, it is possible to run elog locally on my PC, and make it not accessible from outside? 

Moreover, I installed elog on a linux virtual machine running with Virtual Box on Windows 10. Is it possible to open/edit my elog both from the linux VM and from the Windows system? without any accessibility from outside my PC?

Many many thanks

Sara

 

  69093   Fri Jan 24 18:22:52 2020 Reply Laurent Jean-Rigaudlollspam@free.frQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-283534dRe: PAM authentication question

Hi,

Before le pam module link, yes.

After adding it, I wait some seconds before new login window popups with password error message.

 

Jan Christoph Terasa wrote:

Hi Laurent,

does the ELOG server show the window immediately before even showing the login mask?

 

Christoph

Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote:

Hi,

First, thanks to ELOG tool !

 

I'm trying to swicth a ELOG 3.1.2 server with local passwd DB to GIT version builded with SSL/PAM/LDAP options. I reuse the buildrpm script which generates correctly RPM files.

After installing on EL6 x86_64 server, i update the elogd.conf file according to GIT version doc :

  • Authentication = PAM
  • Password file = /usr/local/elog/elog_users.pam   (new file as i want to keep the old local DB)
  • Self register = 3

I add a link for pam module :

$ ll /etc/pam.d/elogd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jan 24 16:23 /etc/pam.d/elogd -> system-auth

elogd starts well

elogd 3.1.4 built Jan 24 2020, 07:34:02 revision 283534d
Config file  : /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Resource dir : /usr/local/elog/
Logbook dir  : /usr/local/elog/logbooks/
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
CKeditor detected
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "convert -version" > /tmp/elog_okY7qv 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_xBge3f 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_GfKWF0 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/opt/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_uZtajL 2>&1
ImageMagick NOT detected. Image scaling will not work.
Indexing logbook "logbook1" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook1/" ... ok
Indexing logbook "logbook2" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook2/" ... ok
Server listening on port 8080 ...

When i try to connect, ELOG login window shows "Invalid user name or password!" .

The logfile (level 9) shows :

24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] POST /logbook1/ HTTP/1.1
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} LOGIN user "toto" (attempt)
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Starting authentication for user toto
24-Jan-2020 16:36:29 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Authentication not successful for user toto

The problem appears for all Linux users as well.

Does i miss something ?

Thanks for help.

Laurent

 

 

David Wallis wrote:

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!

The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.

Jan Christoph Terasa wrote:
David Wallis wrote:

I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.

First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.

The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
    elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)

The questions:

  1. The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
  2. Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?

Thanks in advance!

 

David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:

0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).

1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.

 

regards,

Christoph

 

 

 

 

  69092   Fri Jan 24 18:13:03 2020 Reply Jan Christoph Terasaterasa@physik.uni-kiel.deQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-283534dRe: PAM authentication question

Hi Laurent,

does the ELOG server show the window immediately before even showing the login mask?

 

Christoph

Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote:

Hi,

First, thanks to ELOG tool !

 

I'm trying to swicth a ELOG 3.1.2 server with local passwd DB to GIT version builded with SSL/PAM/LDAP options. I reuse the buildrpm script which generates correctly RPM files.

After installing on EL6 x86_64 server, i update the elogd.conf file according to GIT version doc :

  • Authentication = PAM
  • Password file = /usr/local/elog/elog_users.pam   (new file as i want to keep the old local DB)
  • Self register = 3

I add a link for pam module :

$ ll /etc/pam.d/elogd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jan 24 16:23 /etc/pam.d/elogd -> system-auth

elogd starts well

elogd 3.1.4 built Jan 24 2020, 07:34:02 revision 283534d
Config file  : /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Resource dir : /usr/local/elog/
Logbook dir  : /usr/local/elog/logbooks/
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
CKeditor detected
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "convert -version" > /tmp/elog_okY7qv 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_xBge3f 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_GfKWF0 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/opt/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_uZtajL 2>&1
ImageMagick NOT detected. Image scaling will not work.
Indexing logbook "logbook1" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook1/" ... ok
Indexing logbook "logbook2" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook2/" ... ok
Server listening on port 8080 ...

When i try to connect, ELOG login window shows "Invalid user name or password!" .

The logfile (level 9) shows :

24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] POST /logbook1/ HTTP/1.1
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} LOGIN user "toto" (attempt)
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Starting authentication for user toto
24-Jan-2020 16:36:29 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Authentication not successful for user toto

The problem appears for all Linux users as well.

Does i miss something ?

Thanks for help.

Laurent

 

 

David Wallis wrote:

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!

The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.

Jan Christoph Terasa wrote:
David Wallis wrote:

I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.

First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.

The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
    elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)

The questions:

  1. The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
  2. Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?

Thanks in advance!

 

David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:

0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).

1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.

 

regards,

Christoph

 

 

 

  69091   Fri Jan 24 17:33:14 2020 Reply Laurent Jean-Rigaudlollspam@free.frQuestionLinuxV3.1.4-283534dRe: PAM authentication question

Hi,

First, thanks to ELOG tool !

 

I'm trying to swicth a ELOG 3.1.2 server with local passwd DB to GIT version builded with SSL/PAM/LDAP options. I reuse the buildrpm script which generates correctly RPM files.

After installing on EL6 x86_64 server, i update the elogd.conf file according to GIT version doc :

  • Authentication = PAM
  • Password file = /usr/local/elog/elog_users.pam   (new file as i want to keep the old local DB)
  • Self register = 3

I add a link for pam module :

$ ll /etc/pam.d/elogd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jan 24 16:23 /etc/pam.d/elogd -> system-auth

elogd starts well

elogd 3.1.4 built Jan 24 2020, 07:34:02 revision 283534d
Config file  : /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Resource dir : /usr/local/elog/
Logbook dir  : /usr/local/elog/logbooks/
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
CKeditor detected
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "convert -version" > /tmp/elog_okY7qv 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_xBge3f 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_GfKWF0 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/opt/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_uZtajL 2>&1
ImageMagick NOT detected. Image scaling will not work.
Indexing logbook "logbook1" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook1/" ... ok
Indexing logbook "logbook2" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook2/" ... ok
Server listening on port 8080 ...

When i try to connect, ELOG login window shows "Invalid user name or password!" .

The logfile (level 9) shows :

24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] POST /logbook1/ HTTP/1.1
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} LOGIN user "toto" (attempt)
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Starting authentication for user toto
24-Jan-2020 16:36:29 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Authentication not successful for user toto

The problem appears for all Linux users as well.

Does i miss something ?

Thanks for help.

Laurent

 

 

David Wallis wrote:

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!

The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.

Jan Christoph Terasa wrote:
David Wallis wrote:

I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.

First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.

The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
    elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)

The questions:

  1. The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
  2. Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?

Thanks in advance!

 

David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:

0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).

1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.

 

regards,

Christoph

 

 

  69090   Fri Jan 24 14:56:56 2020 Question Sara Vaninivanini.sara@gmail.comQuestionLinux | Windows3.1.3local usage on windows + Linux virtual machine

Hello again, 

I love to use elog, but I don't need any other accessing it for the moment. So, it is possible to run elog locally on my PC, and make it not accessible from outside? 

Moreover, I installed elog on a linux virtual machine running with Virtual Box on Windows 10. Is it possible to open/edit my elog both from the linux VM and from the Windows system? without any accessibility from outside my PC?

Many many thanks

Sara

  69089   Fri Jan 24 14:56:04 2020 Warning Sara Vaninivanini.sara@gmail.comBug reportLinux3.1.3editor hangs intermittently

Hello,

I'm using ELOG with Ubuntu 19. When I create or edit an entry and I start writing, it hangs for few seconds, resumes, and all over again intermittently.

How can I fix it?

Best

Sara

  69086   Thu Jan 23 14:28:28 2020 Reply Ehab Fanousefanous@lh.caRequestWindows3.1.4Re: HTML editor tools grayed out

Thank yoy for responding back to me ... I run the excutable that I downloaded from the website .. How can I do the full directory tree with the ELOG JavaScript files??

Stefan Ritt wrote:

This typically happens if you update only the executabe and not the full directory tree with the ELOG JavaScript files.

/Stefan

Ehab Fanous wrote:

After we upgarde to eLog 3.1.4 ... The HTML editor tools are grayed out and you can't paste any images in the body of the log like I did below.. Any help will be much appreciated..

 

 

  69085   Wed Jan 22 20:02:09 2020 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestWindows3.1.4Re: HTML editor tools grayed out

This typically happens if you update only the executabe and not the full directory tree with the ELOG JavaScript files.

/Stefan

Ehab Fanous wrote:

After we upgarde to eLog 3.1.4 ... The HTML editor tools are grayed out and you can't paste any images in the body of the log like I did below.. Any help will be much appreciated..

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6