ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
69092
|
Fri Jan 24 18:13:03 2020 |
| Jan Christoph Terasa | terasa@physik.uni-kiel.de | Question | Linux | V3.1.4-283534d | Re: PAM authentication question | Hi Laurent,
does the ELOG server show the window immediately before even showing the login mask?
Christoph
Laurent Jean-Rigaud wrote: |
Hi,
First, thanks to ELOG tool !
I'm trying to swicth a ELOG 3.1.2 server with local passwd DB to GIT version builded with SSL/PAM/LDAP options. I reuse the buildrpm script which generates correctly RPM files.
After installing on EL6 x86_64 server, i update the elogd.conf file according to GIT version doc :
- Authentication = PAM
- Password file = /usr/local/elog/elog_users.pam (new file as i want to keep the old local DB)
- Self register = 3
I add a link for pam module :
$ ll /etc/pam.d/elogd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jan 24 16:23 /etc/pam.d/elogd -> system-auth
elogd starts well
elogd 3.1.4 built Jan 24 2020, 07:34:02 revision 283534d
Config file : /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Resource dir : /usr/local/elog/
Logbook dir : /usr/local/elog/logbooks/
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
CKeditor detected
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "convert -version" > /tmp/elog_okY7qv 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_xBge3f 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_GfKWF0 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/opt/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_uZtajL 2>&1
ImageMagick NOT detected. Image scaling will not work.
Indexing logbook "logbook1" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook1/" ... ok
Indexing logbook "logbook2" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook2/" ... ok
Server listening on port 8080 ...
When i try to connect, ELOG login window shows "Invalid user name or password!" .
The logfile (level 9) shows :
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] POST /logbook1/ HTTP/1.1
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} LOGIN user "toto" (attempt)
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Starting authentication for user toto
24-Jan-2020 16:36:29 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Authentication not successful for user toto
The problem appears for all Linux users as well.
Does i miss something ?
Thanks for help.
Laurent
David Wallis wrote: |
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!
The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.
Jan Christoph Terasa wrote: |
David Wallis wrote: |
I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.
First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.
The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)
The questions:
- The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
- Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?
Thanks in advance!
|
David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:
0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).
1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.
regards,
Christoph
|
|
|
|
69091
|
Fri Jan 24 17:33:14 2020 |
| Laurent Jean-Rigaud | lollspam@free.fr | Question | Linux | V3.1.4-283534d | Re: PAM authentication question | Hi,
First, thanks to ELOG tool !
I'm trying to swicth a ELOG 3.1.2 server with local passwd DB to GIT version builded with SSL/PAM/LDAP options. I reuse the buildrpm script which generates correctly RPM files.
After installing on EL6 x86_64 server, i update the elogd.conf file according to GIT version doc :
- Authentication = PAM
- Password file = /usr/local/elog/elog_users.pam (new file as i want to keep the old local DB)
- Self register = 3
I add a link for pam module :
$ ll /etc/pam.d/elogd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Jan 24 16:23 /etc/pam.d/elogd -> system-auth
elogd starts well
elogd 3.1.4 built Jan 24 2020, 07:34:02 revision 283534d
Config file : /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Resource dir : /usr/local/elog/
Logbook dir : /usr/local/elog/logbooks/
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
CKeditor detected
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "convert -version" > /tmp/elog_okY7qv 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_xBge3f 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/usr/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_GfKWF0 2>&1
Falling back to default group "elog"
Falling back to default user "elog"
Going to execute: /bin/sh -c "/opt/local/bin/convert -version" > /tmp/elog_uZtajL 2>&1
ImageMagick NOT detected. Image scaling will not work.
Indexing logbook "logbook1" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook1/" ... ok
Indexing logbook "logbook2" in "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/logbook2/" ... ok
Server listening on port 8080 ...
When i try to connect, ELOG login window shows "Invalid user name or password!" .
The logfile (level 9) shows :
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] POST /logbook1/ HTTP/1.1
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} LOGIN user "toto" (attempt)
24-Jan-2020 16:36:28 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Starting authentication for user toto
24-Jan-2020 16:36:29 [IP] {MCO} [PAM] Authentication not successful for user toto
The problem appears for all Linux users as well.
Does i miss something ?
Thanks for help.
Laurent
David Wallis wrote: |
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!
The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.
Jan Christoph Terasa wrote: |
David Wallis wrote: |
I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.
First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.
The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)
The questions:
- The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
- Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?
Thanks in advance!
|
David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:
0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).
1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.
regards,
Christoph
|
|
|
69090
|
Fri Jan 24 14:56:56 2020 |
| Sara Vanini | vanini.sara@gmail.com | Question | Linux | Windows | 3.1.3 | local usage on windows + Linux virtual machine | Hello again,
I love to use elog, but I don't need any other accessing it for the moment. So, it is possible to run elog locally on my PC, and make it not accessible from outside?
Moreover, I installed elog on a linux virtual machine running with Virtual Box on Windows 10. Is it possible to open/edit my elog both from the linux VM and from the Windows system? without any accessibility from outside my PC?
Many many thanks
Sara |
69089
|
Fri Jan 24 14:56:04 2020 |
| Sara Vanini | vanini.sara@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.3 | editor hangs intermittently | Hello,
I'm using ELOG with Ubuntu 19. When I create or edit an entry and I start writing, it hangs for few seconds, resumes, and all over again intermittently.
How can I fix it?
Best
Sara |
69086
|
Thu Jan 23 14:28:28 2020 |
| Ehab Fanous | efanous@lh.ca | Request | Windows | 3.1.4 | Re: HTML editor tools grayed out | Thank yoy for responding back to me ... I run the excutable that I downloaded from the website .. How can I do the full directory tree with the ELOG JavaScript files??
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
This typically happens if you update only the executabe and not the full directory tree with the ELOG JavaScript files.
/Stefan
Ehab Fanous wrote: |
After we upgarde to eLog 3.1.4 ... The HTML editor tools are grayed out and you can't paste any images in the body of the log like I did below.. Any help will be much appreciated..

|
|
|
69085
|
Wed Jan 22 20:02:09 2020 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Windows | 3.1.4 | Re: HTML editor tools grayed out | This typically happens if you update only the executabe and not the full directory tree with the ELOG JavaScript files.
/Stefan
Ehab Fanous wrote: |
After we upgarde to eLog 3.1.4 ... The HTML editor tools are grayed out and you can't paste any images in the body of the log like I did below.. Any help will be much appreciated..

|
|
69084
|
Wed Jan 22 19:35:36 2020 |
| Ehab Fanous | efanous@lh.ca | Request | Windows | 3.1.4 | HTML editor tools grayed out | After we upgarde to eLog 3.1.4 ... The HTML editor tools are grayed out and you can't paste any images in the body of the log like I did below.. Any help will be much appreciated..

|
69083
|
Wed Jan 22 19:30:41 2020 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Linux | Windows | Mac OSX | All | Other | 3.1.4 | Re: CSS for HTML Mails | a04faf9f is pretty old: https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog/commits/a04faf9fa9ca74657240cdc827bd2d0ae48a9df1
It's from September 2018, where the change with the CSS has been made on Decemb er 2018. You have to pull the current version from the git repository and recompile the program yourself.
/Stefan
Daniel Pfuhl wrote: |
Hmm, I'm pretty sure that we are on the latest version already.
We use ELOG V3.1.4-a04faf9f
I downloaded a fresh install binary for Windows and compared the checksums:
SHA256: 0A98485134E0D43959CB6734F977B02DC9FA884D6994CE3BA141664451FDA5E5
SHA256: 0A98485134E0D43959CB6734F977B02DC9FA884D6994CE3BA141664451FDA5E5
same same.
Or do I have to change to config in order to include the CSS in the HTML?
regards,
daniel
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
The CSS has been embedded in the email end of 2018, so just upgrade your server.
https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog/commits/5165daf35cc1fb066071827719079fe0c9aa5ffb
/Stefan
Daniel Pfuhl wrote: |
Hi there,
we extensively use Logbuch as a change documentation platform.
E-Mail notifications for new entries are very important for us.
Since we store sensible data in our logbooks the server is protected by a firewall.
After the firewall was activated the HTML mails are not rendered by the Outlook Mail clients we use - when they are located in an "external" net behind the firewall. I assume that's because of the css stylesheet which is linked in the source code of the HTML mail.
Is there any chance to include the CSS information in the HTML code? Otherwise we would need to make the CSS accessable from anywhere which requires in turn that the path of the CSS file can be customized.
Any idea how to solved this issue?
Best regards,
daniel
|
|
|
|
|