Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 118 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show only new entries    6460 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 117, 118, 119 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  67979   Tue Jun 9 16:46:48 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Any better now?

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue.  But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."
  67980   Tue Jun 9 16:51:55 2015 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Hi Stefan,

The email sent from here had he expected (correct) message "A new ELOG entry..."

Thanks, David.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Any better now?

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue.  But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."

 

  67990   Tue Jun 9 22:31:59 2015 Reply Jacky Lizli@hawaii.eduQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Hi,

I compiled the 3.1.0-2 source rpm from the download area.  Unless there is a minor release, I think the problem is still there.  Thank you.

Jacky

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

The email sent from here had he expected (correct) message "A new ELOG entry..."

Thanks, David.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Any better now?

David Pilgram wrote:

Hi Stefan,

I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue.  But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."

 

 

  67991   Wed Jun 10 08:13:50 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinuxV3.1.1-2c4f838Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?

Making a new release takes me about an hour (compile under Windows, Linux, Mac OSX), so I don't do it for each little change. If you want to follow the development closely, I recommend that you learn to compile elog from the GIT repository. It's pretty easy: a git pull, followed by a make and make install.

If you want to see which changes are already in the version you are running, look at the 7 digit GIT hash at the bottom of each elog page and compare it with the bitbucket repository:

 

Jacky Li wrote:

Hi,

I compiled the 3.1.0-2 source rpm from the download area.  Unless there is a minor release, I think the problem is still there.  Thank you.

Jack
  789   Mon Nov 15 21:25:34 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfoAll2.5.5Re: stunnel problems with new version
> i am trying to implement ssl features on our logbooks. however, it seems
> that stunnel has drastically changed their program and the usual startup
> procedures listed on the elog page don't work.
> so, what is the new method for getting elog set up with stunnel?

stunnel is kind of a deprecated feature. Better use the SSL proxy of Apache,
as written in the elog admin guide. If someone else figures out how to use the
more revent stunnel, I'm willing to update the documentation.
  792   Mon Nov 15 21:59:56 2004 Reply damon nettlesnettles@phgrav.phys.lsu.edu   Re: stunnel problems with new version
> > i am trying to implement ssl features on our logbooks. however, it seems
> > that stunnel has drastically changed their program and the usual startup
> > procedures listed on the elog page don't work.
> > so, what is the new method for getting elog set up with stunnel?
> 
> stunnel is kind of a deprecated feature. Better use the SSL proxy of Apache,
> as written in the elog admin guide. If someone else figures out how to use the
> more revent stunnel, I'm willing to update the documentation.


okay. that's good to know. i'll try using the apache method instead. but, there is
something wrong with the "secure" link to an example on the elog administrator's
guide.
  68363   Thu Jul 21 06:15:44 2016 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chInfoLinuxELOG V3.1.0-241Re: string length limit in url tag
Several strings in ELOG are limited to 256 chars. It is likely the limit for URLs, too.
The magic number "256" appears 285 times in the elogd.c file.
It is probaly easier if you compress long URLs with goo.gl
Cheers, Andreas
Don wrote:

What is the string length limit in url tag and how to increase it?

For example,

[url=http://example.com?<text_string>]click here[/url]

When I provide very long <text_string>, it was truncated and showed partial link only.

 

  42   Mon Jul 1 10:31:31 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug fix  Re: strage colors when only 'cmd=Search' is given as command
> Try this URL
> 
> http://midas.psi.ch/elogdemo/Forum/?cmd=Search

Ok, has been fixed. Will be included in the next version.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 117, 118, 119 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6