Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 9 16:46:48 2015
|
Any better now?
| David Pilgram wrote: |
|
Hi Stefan,
I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue. But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."
|
|
|
Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 9 16:51:55 2015
|
Hi Stefan,
The email sent from here had he expected (correct) message "A new ELOG entry..."
Thanks, David.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Any better now?
| David Pilgram wrote: |
|
Hi Stefan,
I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue. But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."
|
|
|
|
Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by Jacky Li on Tue Jun 9 22:31:59 2015
|
Hi,
I compiled the 3.1.0-2 source rpm from the download area. Unless there is a minor release, I think the problem is still there. Thank you.
Jacky
| David Pilgram wrote: |
|
Hi Stefan,
The email sent from here had he expected (correct) message "A new ELOG entry..."
Thanks, David.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Any better now?
| David Pilgram wrote: |
|
Hi Stefan,
I see that you've updated the elog running this forum today, 5 versions after you reported fixing the "A new elog entry has been entered" and "An old elog entry has been updated" issue. But the emails coming out are still all of the "An old elog entry...", rather than "A new..."
|
|
|
|
Re: subject line bug on resumit elog entries as new?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 10 08:13:50 2015 
|
Making a new release takes me about an hour (compile under Windows, Linux, Mac OSX), so I don't do it for each little change. If you want to follow the development closely, I recommend that you learn to compile elog from the GIT repository. It's pretty easy: a git pull, followed by a make and make install.
If you want to see which changes are already in the version you are running, look at the 7 digit GIT hash at the bottom of each elog page and compare it with the bitbucket repository:
| Jacky Li wrote: |
|
Hi,
I compiled the 3.1.0-2 source rpm from the download area. Unless there is a minor release, I think the problem is still there. Thank you.
Jack
|
|
|
Re: stunnel problems with new version, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 15 21:25:34 2004
|
> i am trying to implement ssl features on our logbooks. however, it seems
> that stunnel has drastically changed their program and the usual startup
> procedures listed on the elog page don't work.
> so, what is the new method for getting elog set up with stunnel?
stunnel is kind of a deprecated feature. Better use the SSL proxy of Apache,
as written in the elog admin guide. If someone else figures out how to use the
more revent stunnel, I'm willing to update the documentation. |
|
Re: stunnel problems with new version, posted by damon nettles on Mon Nov 15 21:59:56 2004
|
> > i am trying to implement ssl features on our logbooks. however, it seems
> > that stunnel has drastically changed their program and the usual startup
> > procedures listed on the elog page don't work.
> > so, what is the new method for getting elog set up with stunnel?
>
> stunnel is kind of a deprecated feature. Better use the SSL proxy of Apache,
> as written in the elog admin guide. If someone else figures out how to use the
> more revent stunnel, I'm willing to update the documentation.
okay. that's good to know. i'll try using the apache method instead. but, there is
something wrong with the "secure" link to an example on the elog administrator's
guide. |
|
Re: string length limit in url tag, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Thu Jul 21 06:15:44 2016
|
Several strings in ELOG are limited to 256 chars. It is likely the limit for URLs, too.
The magic number "256" appears 285 times in the elogd.c file.
It is probaly easier if you compress long URLs with goo.gl
Cheers, Andreas
| Don wrote: |
|
What is the string length limit in url tag and how to increase it?
For example,
[url=http://example.com?<text_string>]click here[/url]
When I provide very long <text_string>, it was truncated and showed partial link only.
|
|
|
Re: strage colors when only 'cmd=Search' is given as command, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jul 1 10:31:31 2002
|
> Try this URL
>
> http://midas.psi.ch/elogdemo/Forum/?cmd=Search
Ok, has been fixed. Will be included in the next version. |