Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:08:56 2005
|
> > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:14:53 2005
|
> > > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
|
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005
|
> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9). Is there a reason why these includes are not
> placed in the src dir like the regex.h/.c include?
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:22:46 2005
|
[ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
elog-2.5.9/
elog-2.5.9/doc/
|
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005
|
> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
|
|
Re: post box question, posted by damon nettles on Thu May 12 18:32:18 2005
|
> > is there any way to get a larger text box to type in when making a new post?
> > the default box is rather small and you have to scroll up and down when
> > making a new post or editing an existing one.
|
Omitting some fields in e-mail, posted by Michael Husbyn on Tue Jun 7 10:59:20 2005
|
Hello,
Is there a way to include some attribute fields in the e-mail from eLog, but not all?
|
|
Unable to send mails through elog, posted by Kumar on Wed Jun 8 10:45:18 2005
|
Hi All
I need to send mail through Elog. With Version 2.5.7 it seems to work only when less content is in the elog entry. But when I fill in a lot of content |