Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 124 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  68863   Wed Nov 28 09:26:11 2018 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindows3.1.2Re: French Language

I just tried myself with the current version 3.1.4 and it worked for me flawlessly. Maybe you want to upgrade.

Stefan

Yanick Vachon wrote:

Hi,

When i set Language = French in global config it works in french until i logout, after i can't login anymore, even if i enter my user and password i always stay at the login window, the only way to login again is to edit the Elogd.cfg file in Elog directory, remove the Language = french and save then i can login in and work normally in english version.

 

Thanks.

 

  68862   Tue Nov 27 20:06:17 2018 Warning Yanick Vachonyvachon@materiauxblanchet.caBug reportWindows3.1.2French Language

Hi,

When i set Language = French in global config it works in french until i logout, after i can't login anymore, even if i enter my user and password i always stay at the login window, the only way to login again is to edit the Elogd.cfg file in Elog directory, remove the Language = french and save then i can login in and work normally in english version.

 

Thanks.

  68861   Tue Nov 27 15:21:31 2018 Reply Yanick Vachonyvachon@materiauxblanchet.caRequestWindows3.1.2Re: Need to change port 25

I Stefan, it works with the 587 port.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

I believe Yanick means the SMTP port, not the port under which elogd is listening. The SMPT port is hard wired to 25, because port 587 was not yet defiend when I wrote that code. I can make this a variable, but only if it works. So Yanick can you test if port 587 accepts normal SMTP commands? We don't have such a new server at our lab and I cannot test it. Under Windows you can open a command prompt and telnet to the mail server:

telnet <server> 587
HELO test
MAIL FROM: test

your server should then reply with "220 ..." and "250 ..." messages. Once this works, I will implement the variable SMTP port.

Stefan

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

This is nicely explained in the documentation: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/config.html#global

The following options are specific to the [global] section:
Port = <port>
Specifies the TCP port under which the server is listening. Default is 80. Can be superseeded via the '-p' command line flag.
Yanick Vachon wrote:

Hi,

We've made changes in our network and now we have to use port 587 instead of port 25, how can i edit that parameter?

Thanks

 

 

 

  68860   Tue Nov 27 08:59:45 2018 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestWindows3.1.2Re: Need to change port 25

I believe Yanick means the SMTP port, not the port under which elogd is listening. The SMPT port is hard wired to 25, because port 587 was not yet defiend when I wrote that code. I can make this a variable, but only if it works. So Yanick can you test if port 587 accepts normal SMTP commands? We don't have such a new server at our lab and I cannot test it. Under Windows you can open a command prompt and telnet to the mail server:

telnet <server> 587
HELO test
MAIL FROM: test

your server should then reply with "220 ..." and "250 ..." messages. Once this works, I will implement the variable SMTP port.

Stefan

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

This is nicely explained in the documentation: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/config.html#global

The following options are specific to the [global] section:
Port = <port>
Specifies the TCP port under which the server is listening. Default is 80. Can be superseeded via the '-p' command line flag.
Yanick Vachon wrote:

Hi,

We've made changes in our network and now we have to use port 587 instead of port 25, how can i edit that parameter?

Thanks

 

 

  68859   Tue Nov 27 08:19:11 2018 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chRequestWindows3.1.2Re: Need to change port 25

This is nicely explained in the documentation: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/config.html#global

The following options are specific to the [global] section:
Port = <port>
Specifies the TCP port under which the server is listening. Default is 80. Can be superseeded via the '-p' command line flag.
Yanick Vachon wrote:

Hi,

We've made changes in our network and now we have to use port 587 instead of port 25, how can i edit that parameter?

Thanks

 

  68858   Mon Nov 26 17:32:31 2018 Warning Yanick Vachonyvachon@materiauxblanchet.caRequestWindows3.1.2Need to change port 25

Hi,

We've made changes in our network and now we have to use port 587 instead of port 25, how can i edit that parameter?

Thanks

  68857   Mon Oct 29 14:26:28 2018 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionWindows3.1.3Re: Logfile not registering entry numbers?

As a regular elog (ab)user, I have seen this behaviour from time to time.  So far as I recall, the cause actually is that a normal entry is looking for the entry in the "Reply to" field of the normal entry in the yymmdda.log file.  When that entry does not exist, then I see a duplicate line of an entry with entry "#0", in emboldened black type.  I did have a screenshot, but cannot find it for now. 

A quick (relative term, that) search usually finds the entry which references the missing "Reply to" line, and editing that, all is well.  I'm not sure how this can happen, but it does.  NB, I'm still on elog 2.9.2 so I don't know how the draft facility works and possibly enhances the possibility of this issue.

 

Note that this is different to the case (rather more frequent) where the entry in  the "In reply to" field is missing.  This causes elog to go into a continuous loop and only the strongest measures  ("kill -9 xxxx in linux) will break this out.  This can happen more frequently as if you delete a thread with a large number (>40?) of entries, elog crashes, but more importantly, hasn't finished the job.  Clicking on the remenents of the thread (which are usually the later entries) causes the endless loop.

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

It looks like you've found a bug in ELOG. I've checked my elog.log and see that all NEW entry lines show "#0".

I've looked into the code: the message is written before the new entry is submitted, and only then the entry ID is defined.
For new entries one would need to make the logging print line later - but that would blow up the code.
The message IDs are correct for saving drafts and editing entries. I'll discuss with Stefan if that should be fixed.
 
Andreas
 
Sergio Navarrete wrote:

I have configured a logbook with the logfile on, but when a user replies to an entry the line logged goes

Date Time [User@IP] {Logbook} NEW entry #0

How can I make the #0 be the real entry number for the reply?

 

 

 

  68856   Sat Oct 27 10:51:12 2018 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinuxELOG V3.1.2-bd7Re: messy code for chinese charactor
Can you post a screenshot?


Wenhao Huang wrote:
The Chinese character appears messy code. The encoding way is the default utf-8. How can I solve this problem?
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6