| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
69786
|
Tue Apr 16 13:31:02 2024 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Mac OSX | 3.1.5 | Re: Suggestion to update Mac OS X instructions in ELOG Administrator's Guide | Thanks, fixed.
Stefan
|
|
|
69785
|
Tue Apr 16 13:20:01 2024 |
| Andreas Warburton | andreas.warburton@mcgill.ca | Request | Mac OSX | 3.1.5 | Re: Suggestion to update Mac OS X instructions in ELOG Administrator's Guide | Hi Stefan, Thanks a lot for implementing
the updated commands. I noted that there
are a few typos that could cause people confusion |
|
|
69784
|
Mon Apr 15 18:05:27 2024 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Mac OSX | 3.1.5 | Re: Suggestion to update Mac OS X instructions in ELOG Administrator's Guide | Thanks for the info, I updated the adminguide.
Stefan
|
|
|
69783
|
Mon Apr 15 17:53:23 2024 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | ELOG V3.1.3-793 | Re: Draft saved after ~15 minutes, then anything entered a few hours later is ignored | That's strange. If you edit a message,
indeed a draft is saved every ten seconds
or so when you keep typing. In our installations |
|
|
69782
|
Mon Apr 15 17:50:20 2024 |
| Stefan Ritt | Hastefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-793 | Re: Record date isn't set to current date when replying to elogs | Have you tried the config option "Preset
on reply <attribute> = $date".
On a reply, the <attribute> will be |
|
|
69781
|
Tue Apr 9 13:49:51 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | ELOG V3.1.4-395 | Re: today date in template | This was given to me by Andreas Luedeke of
this parish.
|
|
|
Draft
|
Tue Apr 9 13:40:44 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | ELOG V3.1.4-395 | Re: today date in template | This was given to me by Andreas L,
In my elog.cfg file, I have the following:
|
|
|
69779
|
Tue Apr 9 09:25:01 2024 |
| Nick Sauerwein | nick.sauerwein@luxtelligence.ai | Info | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: Extendable list of numeric items | Hey,
thanks for your answer. I completely get |
|