Stefan,

I cut the log in two parts w/o modifying the content and the search runs. It seems that the size of this entrie 426 is closed to a limit (as during testing, i met a message after clicking save to recompile elog to increase a size of something), so it could be the problem.

I reduced the entrie size by extracting the last part in a new entrie and it seems to be OK.

The old size was 250099 bytes. New size is 240084.

I hope this will be OK.

Regards

Thanks for the detailed investiations and report. Finally I could reproduce the problem by having messages with a text body size close to 250000 bytes (some internal limit). Never thought that someone really has the patience to write 250'000 chars in a single message, but I guess you did some copy/paste from a large file. Thought in such cases people use attachments. Nevertheless, I fixed an internal memory allocation problem, now it shoudl be fine to have such large messages. Change is committed.

Stefan

Thanks to you, Stefan !

You software is very usefull for us and it's nice to have support.

Have a nice day !

Hi,

I use some CSS for each elog to resize column correcly and it seems that current ELOG version 3.14 available from EPEL for EL7 has a problem (maybe others also).

The browser console displays an error when loading ELOG logbook page (french locale ):

La feuille de style https:/xxxxx.xxx.xx/elog/MCO/1130_171749_REUNION_20221130_Q01.jpgelog-mco.css n’a pas été chargée car son type MIME, « text/html », n’est pas « text/css ».

It seems ELOG server send the css link with enclosure path (https:/xxxxx.xxx.xx/elog/MCO/1130_171749_REUNION_20221130_Q01.jpg) + css file (elog-mco.css) ?!?

I tryed to rebuild the last source from git under EL7 but it fails with LDAP libs (C++ regression already reported in elog:forum/69478). :-(

Thanks for help.

Laurent

Update : i tryed with last git, w/o ldap support and it seems the problem is solved with CCS URL on same machine (just replace the elogd binary from EPEL by new one just build w/o LDAP support and fallback on File to login for testing).

So my problem is the error during build with LDAP auth (since using C++) :-(

...

+ cd elog-3-14
+ make USE_SSL=1 USE_LDAP=1 USE_KRB5=1 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml'
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_KRB5 -DHAVE_LDAP -c -o mxml.o mxml/mxml.cxx
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_KRB5 -DHAVE_LDAP -w -c -o crypt.o src/crypt.cxx
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_KRB5 -DHAVE_LDAP -c -o strlcpy.o mxml/strlcpy.cxx
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_KRB5 -DHAVE_LDAP -o elog src/elog.cxx mxml.o crypt.o strlcpy.o -lssl -lkrb5 -lldap -llber
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_KRB5 -DHAVE_LDAP -w -c -o auth.o src/auth.cxx
src/auth.cxx: In function 'int auth_verify_password_ldap(LOGBOOK*, const char*, const char*, char*, int)':
src/auth.cxx:283:60: error: 'ldap_simple_bind_s' was not declared in this scope
    bind = ldap_simple_bind_s(ldap_ld, ldap_bindDN, password);
                                                            ^
src/auth.cxx:290:26: error: 'ldap_unbind' was not declared in this scope
       ldap_unbind(ldap_ld);
                          ^
src/auth.cxx:295:23: error: 'ldap_unbind' was not declared in this scope
    ldap_unbind(ldap_ld);
                       ^
src/auth.cxx: In function 'int ldap_adduser_file(LOGBOOK*, const char*, const char*, char*, int)':
src/auth.cxx:323:60: error: 'ldap_simple_bind_s' was not declared in this scope
    bind = ldap_simple_bind_s(ldap_ld, ldap_bindDN, password);
                                                            ^
src/auth.cxx:330:26: error: 'ldap_unbind' was not declared in this scope
       ldap_unbind(ldap_ld);
                          ^
src/auth.cxx:358:26: error: 'ldap_unbind' was not declared in this scope
       ldap_unbind(ldap_ld);
                          ^
src/auth.cxx:369:62: error: 'ldap_get_values' was not declared in this scope
          if((values = ldap_get_values(ldap_ld,entry,attribute)) != NULL ) {
                                                              ^
src/auth.cxx:378:35: error: 'ldap_value_free' was not declared in this scope
             ldap_value_free(values);
                                   ^
src/auth.cxx:386:23: error: 'ldap_unbind' was not declared in this scope
    ldap_unbind(ldap_ld);
                       ^
src/auth.cxx: In function 'int auth_verify_password(LOGBOOK*, const char*, const char*, char*, int)':
src/auth.cxx:593:73: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' [-fpermissive]
          if (get_user_line(lbs, user, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) == 2) {
                                                                         ^
In file included from src/auth.cxx:30:0:
src/elogd.h:282:5: error:   initializing argument 2 of 'int get_user_line(LOGBOOK*, char*, char*, char*, char*, BOOL*, time_t*, int*)' [-fpermissive]
 int get_user_line(LOGBOOK * lbs, char *user, char *password, char *full_name, char *email,
     ^
make: *** [auth.o] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /home/il/jeanrigaudl/rpmbuild/tmp/rpm-tmp.cKJL45 (%build)

Updated :

1. from google (https://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201104/msg00030.html), it seems it's necessary to add before "#include ldap.h" in src/auth.cxx

#define LDAP_DEPRECATED 1

2. A cast must be added to src/auth.cxx:593 as already done somewhere with C++ commit :

         if (get_user_line(lbs, (char *) user, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) == 2) {
 

-> elogd builds now with ldap :-) .

I installed elogd binary and i could login and the css url problem is gone.

Thanks to update auth.cxx (2 mods) and buildrpm (2 mods) in git (sorry, no pull request).

NB : PAM can not be activated under EL7 with same type of error. I disabled the feature as i do not use it.

+ cd elog-3-14
+ make USE_SSL=1 USE_PAM=1 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml'
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_PAM -c -o mxml.o mxml/mxml.cxx
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_PAM -w -c -o crypt.o src/crypt.cxx
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_PAM -c -o strlcpy.o mxml/strlcpy.cxx
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_PAM -o elog src/elog.cxx mxml.o crypt.o strlcpy.o -lssl -lpam -llber
c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-unused-result -Imxml -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_PAM -w -c -o auth.o src/auth.cxx
src/auth.cxx: In function 'int elog_conv(int, const pam_message**, pam_response**, void*)':
src/auth.cxx:452:59: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'pam_response*' [-fpermissive]
    if((*resp = calloc(num_msg, sizeof(struct pam_response))) == NULL)
                                                           ^
src/auth.cxx:457:33: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'const char*' [-fpermissive]
    if(!(resptok = strdup(my_data))) {
                                 ^
In file included from src/elogd.h:46:0,
                 from src/auth.cxx:30:
/usr/include/string.h:172:14: error:   initializing argument 1 of 'char* strdup(const char*)' [-fpermissive]
 extern char *strdup (const char *__s)
              ^
make: *** [auth.o] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /home/il/jeanrigaudl/rpmbuild/tmp/rpm-tmp.V2LE4L (%build)
 

> elogd binary from EPEL

thank you for bringing this up to our attention. we recently went through this with debian and ubuntu. the elog package was severely out of date and 
did not include the security patches that went it right before covid started in the Winter of 2020.

the elogd package in EPEL7 is insecure and should not be used. (I see it is removed from EPEL8, EPEL9 and current Fedora).

I will have to contact EPEL maintainers to have it removed from EPEL7 (or at least to have it marked as "insecure, do not use").

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/Packages/e/elog-3.1.4-1.20190113git283534d97d5a.el7.src.rpm

https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/elog/elog/
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/elog/elog/fedora-35.html
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/elog/elog/epel-7.html

note in the changelog "Update to post-release snapshot of 3.1.4. - Fix several security issues."

K.O.

> > elogd binary from EPEL
> 
> thank you for bringing this up to our attention. we recently went through this with debian and ubuntu. the elog package was severely out of date and 
> did not include the security patches that went it right before covid started in the Winter of 2020.
> 
> the elogd package in EPEL7 is insecure and should not be used. (I see it is removed from EPEL8, EPEL9 and current Fedora).
> 
> I will have to contact EPEL maintainers to have it removed from EPEL7 (or at least to have it marked as "insecure, do not use").
> 
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/Packages/e/elog-3.1.4-1.20190113git283534d97d5a.el7.src.rpm
> 
> https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/elog/elog/
> https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/elog/elog/fedora-35.html
> https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/elog/elog/epel-7.html
> 
> note in the changelog "Update to post-release snapshot of 3.1.4. - Fix several security issues."
> 
> K.O.


Good day, elog has never been retired in EPEL 7. It is still there
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elog/tree/epel7

I am pretty sure because I am a Fedora/RHEL package maintainer and a retired package should contain in its Git branch only a file named "dead.package"

I'm having a minor issue that were getting double entries due to the user is using the "submit" button more than once.

I seems like when there is a lag either on the machine or on the network it is possible to tap the "submit" button more than once resulting i a double or triple entry containing the same text and a almost identical timestamp.

Is there a way to aviod this?, my "solution" so far has been to select the entries and manually delete them. I'm using Elog version 3.14

Kind Regards Finn