Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Mon Mar 7 22:07:54 2022 
|
> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Wed Mar 9 17:55:31 2022
|
I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables |
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Florian Heigl on Mon Apr 18 19:16:36 2022
|
> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Daniel Pfuhl on Tue Apr 19 15:47:59 2022
|
> I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Tue Apr 19 17:02:57 2022
|
> > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Daniel Pfuhl on Tue Apr 19 20:13:04 2022
|
> > > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Tue Apr 19 21:15:19 2022
|
> it would be good if the current state was listed in https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Vulnerabilities/
> It seems there's now updated builds for at least windows
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Apr 22 12:55:21 2022
|
> it would be good if the current state was listed in https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Vulnerabilities/
> It seems there's now updated builds for at least windows, and the debian package still outdated?
|