ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Text |
|
69718
|
Mon Jan 8 17:30:42 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Re: Maximum number of attributes | Or what about the "ticket number"
feature? Every new entry thread
(sorry, confusing terminology on my part) would |
|
69717
|
Mon Jan 8 16:25:05 2024 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Re: Maximum number of attributes | Why don't you simply create a single
attribute "identifier", which then
gets a value D_001, ..., D_xxx. You can still |
|
69716
|
Mon Jan 8 16:18:45 2024 |
| Dr Marta Divall | marta.divall@epfl.ch | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Re: Maximum number of attributes | To explain the problem, we have silicon
chip designs, which we log with an indentifyier,
which is the attribute for easy search, as |
|
69715
|
Mon Jan 8 15:56:40 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Re: Maximum number of attributes | In my case, I had a number of attributes
which had a varied prefix. For example,
"progressed" , which could have |
|
69714
|
Mon Jan 8 11:42:08 2024 |
| Dr Marta Divall | marta.divall@epfl.ch | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Re: Maximum number of attributes | Dear Stefan,
Thansk for the super fast
response! To keep the stability of the system |
|
69713
|
Mon Jan 8 11:08:14 2024 |
| Stefan Ritt | Zou stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Re: Maximum number of attributes | You would have to change the elogd.c code
and recompile. At some point you wlll however
get crash of elogd with a stack overflow. |
|
69712
|
Mon Jan 8 11:06:49 2024 |
| Dr Marta Divall | marta.divall@epfl.ch | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Maximum number of attributes | The maximum number or attributes is 100.
Is it possible to increase this?
Thanks! |
|
69710
|
Thu Nov 30 14:28:12 2023 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: Restricting entries view by user | Keeping the global and individual logbooks
in sync is not possible. So indded my proposal
is a cumbersome solution in your case. We |
|