Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 172 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Authordown Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  831   Mon Dec 6 21:22:20 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionAll2.5.5-2Re: external authentication possible?
> In order to avoid having to remember multiple usernames/passwords for
> different systems, is it possible for ELOG to use external authentication
> via Active Directory, etc?

Not yet.
  832   Mon Dec 6 21:48:19 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportAll2.5.5-2Re: back button does not work
> hi
> the back button/liunk does not work
> if i click on an entry and then back, it does not work properly, i see the 
> same entry
> if i click on the new button or the find button,  and then back, it does 
> not work properly
> mfg guenter

Thanks for reporting that bug, it has been fixed in the curreny CVS version.
  836   Tue Dec 7 16:15:28 2004 Entry Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportOther2.5.5-2Re: dropdown-lists display only the first 100 entries
Right. Number of options is limited to 100.
  839   Thu Dec 9 11:40:05 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportOther2.5.5-2Re: dropdown-lists display only the first 100 entries
> > Right. Number of options is limited to 100.
> hi, i found the MAX_N_LIST macro and increased it

Please note that if you make it too big, you will get a stack overflow and
elogd will crash.
  842   Sun Dec 12 12:40:53 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux Re: form posting
> however, I am not sure what elog checks for when doing the post through
> form. and the auto-submit script always failed and returns "200 EOF". i can
> get to the login part and grab form entry. its only the submittion failed.

What you can do is run the elog submit utility with the "-v" flag (verbose) and
grap the output. It's HTML code, but you should see any error message there.
  843   Sun Dec 12 12:43:55 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux Re: Anyone try doing majordomo->Elog?
> We currently have Elog postings mirrored on to a majordomo email list. 
> Invariably, people on this list reply to the listserv and not to the Elog. 
> Has anyone tried getting emails to a listserv to autoformat and register as
> proper elog entries.  Didn't see any mention of this in the docs or forums.

I personally use Elog *instead* a majordomo email list. You can either specify
a email list in the elogd.cfg file, or you can keep a list of users in the
password file with automatic email notifications, that's how this forum works
for example. But I don't know if you can give up your majordomo list.
  844   Sun Dec 12 12:49:06 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfoAll2.5.5-2Re: external authentication possible?
> The only common denominator that could possibly cover all contingencies would
> be LDAP authentication.  One way of doing this in a more-or-less universal
> fashion is to offload the auth task from eLog itself and place the burden on
> Apache.  This means figuring out how to get Apache to pass auth info to eLog
> when eLog operates behind Apache.  In the end, anything that can use LDAP as an
> authentication mechanism (like AD) can host eLog - as long as eLog can glom off
> of Apache's ability to do the actual authenticating.  

That sounds to me like a great idea. If anybody gets this working, people would be
grateful if this could be submitted to the "Contributions" section of this forum.
  850   Wed Dec 15 18:19:31 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chCommentAll2.5.5-2Re: external authentication possible?
> Ah, you test me!  Perhaps I will attempt to dig into this but I may have to leave the
> integration up to you, Stefan.  Seems that there would be two roads to go:
> 1> Move away from standalone and start to rely on Apache
> 2> Continue with the standalone theme and build in LDAP authentication (which could
> also give you groups functions as well). 
> 
> I think I would opt for <2>

<1> would only make sense if the functionality could be completely implemented inside
Apache, without (much) modification of elog. Otherwise I agree that <2> would be more
following the general lines of elog. I was considering to implement PAM (pluggable
authorization module) support into elog, which is quite easy to implement and gives you
to power of having LDAP, Kerberos, Unix username, Windows NT Domain and much more. But
that would them be restricted to elog running under Linux (and Solaris I guess), since
I'm not aware of a PAM implementation under Windows.

Implementing LDAP directly into elog gives me the problem that we don't use LDAP
authentication at our institute (it's Kerberos in fact). So I would have to set up my own
LDAP server for testing, plus we at our institute don't have a direct benefit from that,
which would make it hard for me to justify to spend time on.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6